medigraphic.com
ISSN 2307-2113 (Digital)
Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED)

2020, Número 4

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED) 2020; 31 (4)


Participación del Caribe en la ciencia regional: una mirada general y un análisis comparado de Cuba, Jamaica y Trinidad y Tobago

Santin DM, Caregnato SE

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 40
Paginas: 1-25
Archivo PDF: 815.96 Kb.


RESUMEN

El Caribe es una subregión del continente americano formada por 13 países y 14 territorios dependientes, los cuales se caracterizan por una gran diversidad. A pesar de su relevancia, está poco explorado en los estudios de la ciencia regional. Este artículo se propone analizar la ciencia caribeña a principios del siglo XXI, basada en insumos y resultados, así como en el enfoque de los indicadores cienciométricos de la actividad, el impacto y la especialización. Se compararon los perfiles de los países más productivos y se discutieron las contribuciones de la subregión a la ciencia de América Latina y el Caribe. Los resultados revelan una producción relevante, aunque modesta, y una amplia diversidad, tanto en la distribución geográfica y en la temática, como en los perfiles y en la especialización científica de los países según los modelos de publicación. Se concluye que la producción del Caribe es relevante para su desarrollo y contribuye a la diversificación de la ciencia regional, no solo en términos de temas y modelos de publicación, sino también en la relación con la distribución geográfica y la reducción de las desigualdades científicas regionales.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. United Nations. Statistics Division. Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistics Use; 2014 [access: 2016/March/20]. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49

  2. Frame JD. Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia. 1977;2(3):143-7.

  3. Krauskopf M, Vera MI, Krauskopf V, Welljams-Dorof A. A citationist perspective on science in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1981-1993. Scientometrics. 1995 [access: 2016/March/14];34(1):3-25. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02019169

  4. Garfield E. Quantitative analysis of the scientific literature and its implications for science policymaking in Latin America and the Caribbean. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1995;29(1):87-95.

  5. Velho L. Science and technology in Latin America and the Caribbean: an overview. UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series. Maastricht: United Nations University; 2004.

  6. Velez-Cuartas G, Lucio-Arias D, Leydesdorff L. Regional and global science: Latin American and Caribbean publications in the SciELO Citation Index and the Web of Science. El Prof Inf. 2016 [access: 2020/October/15];25(1):35-46. Available from: http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2016/ene/05.pdf

  7. Santin DM. Ciência mainstream e periférica da América Latina e Caribe: configurações e padrões de especialização. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2019 [access: 2020/October/20]. Available from: https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/193701

  8. Araujo Ruiz JA, Arencibia Jorge R, Gutiérrez Calzado C. Ensayos clínicos cubanos publicados en revistas de impacto internacional: estudio bibliométrico del período 1991-2001. Rev Española Doc Científica. 2002;25(3):254-66.

  9. Araujo Ruiz JA, van Hooydonk G, Torricella Morales RG, Arencibia Jorge R. Cuban scientific articles in ISI Citation Indexes and CubaCiencias databases (1988-2003). Scientometrics. 2005 access: 2020/October/20;65(2):161-71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0265-4

  10. Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Zacca-Gonzalez G, Vargas-Quesada B, Moya-Anegon F. Latin American scientific output in public health: combined analysis using bibliometric, socioeconomic and health indicators. Scientometrics. 2015 Jan;102(1):609-28.

  11. Galbán-Rodríguez E, Torres-Ponjuán D, Martí-Lahera Y, Arencibia-Jorge R. Measuring the Cuban scientific output in scholarly journals through a comprehensive coverage approach. Scientometrics. 2019 access: 2020/October/16;121(2):1019-43. Available from: Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03233-6

  12. Saavedra-Fernández O, Sotolongo Aguilar G, Guzmán Sánchez M. Medición de la producción científica en América Latina y el Caribe en el campo agrícola: un estudio bibliométrico. Rev Esp Doc Cient. 2002;25(2):151-61.

  13. Wang J. Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics. 2013 access: 2016/March/14;94(3):851-72. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9

  14. Schulz PA, Manganote EJT. Revisiting country research profiles: learning about the scientific cultures. Scientometrics. 2012 access: 2020/October/20;93(2):517-31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0696-7

  15. Glänzel W. Bibliometric as a research field. Course Handouts; 2003 [access: 2020/October/15]. Available from: http://nsdl.niscair.res.in/jspui/bitstream/123456789/968/1/Bib_Module_KUL.pdf

  16. Tuzi F. The scientific specialisation of the Italian regions. Scientometrics. 2005 access: 2020/October/15;62(1):87-111. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0005-9

  17. Schubert A, Braun T. Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics. 1986 access: 2020/October/12;9(5-6):281-91. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF02017249

  18. Abramo G, D'Angelo CA, Di Costa F. A new approach to measure the scientific strengths of territories. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015 [access: 2020/October/12];66(6):1167-77. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23257

  19. Abramo G, D'Angelo CA, Di Costa F. A new bibliometric approach to assess the scientific specialization of regions. Res Eval. 2014 [access: 2020/October/12];23(2):183-94. Available from: http://rev.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1093/reseval/rvu005

  20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - OECD. Revised Field of Science and Technology (FOS) classification in the Frascati Manual. Paris: OECD; 2007 [access: 2020/October/12]. Available from: Available from: http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/38235147.pdf

  21. European Comission. REIST-2 - The European Report on Science and Technology Indicators. Brussels: European Commission; 1997 [access: 2020/October/12]. Available from: Available from: https://cordis.europa.eu/indicators/publications.htm

  22. Glänzel W, Leta J, Thijs B. Science in Brazil. Part 1: a macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics. 2006 [access: 2020/October/12];67(1):67-86. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0055-7

  23. Frame JD, Narin F, Carpenter MP. The distribution of world science. Soc Stud Sci. 1977;7(4):501-16.

  24. Gibbs W. The lost science in the Third World. Sci Am. 1995;273(2):92-9.

  25. May RM. The Scientific Wealth of Nations. Science. 1997 [access: 2020/October/12];275(5301):793-6. Available from: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/275/5301/793

  26. King DA. The scientific impact of nations. Nature. 2004 [access: 2020/October/12];430:311. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a

  27. Santin DM, Caregnato SE. The binomial center-periphery and the evaluation of science based on indicators. Investig Bibl Arch Bibl e Inf. 2019 [access: 2020/October/16];33(79):13. Available from: http://rev-ib.unam.mx/ib/index.php/ib/article/view/57930

  28. Royal Society. Knowledge, networks and nations: global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. 2011 [access: 2020/October/16]. Available from: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/45410/

  29. Adams J. Collaborations: the fourth age of research. Nature. 2013 access: 2020/October/12;497(7451):557-60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/497557a

  30. Packer AL. The SciELO model for electronic publishing and measuring of usage and impact of Latin American and Caribbean scientific journals. In: Proceedings of the Second ICSU/UNESCO Paris: International Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science; 2001. p. 53-6.

  31. Unesco. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Unesco Science Report 2015: towards 2030. Paris: Unesco; 2015.

  32. Beigel F. El nuevo carácter de la dependencia intelectual. Cuest Sociol. 2016;(14):e004.

  33. Chavarro DA. Universalism and particularism: explaining the emergence and growth of regional journal indexing systems. Brighton: University of Sussex; 2016.

  34. Lemarchand GA. National Science, Technology and Innovation Systems in Latin America and the Caribbean. Montevideo: UNESCO; 2010.

  35. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente. Quiénes somos? La Habana: CITMA; 2019 [access: 2020/October/13]. Available from: Available from: http://www.citma.gob.cu/pagina-ejemplo

  36. MSET. About us. Jamaica: MSET; 2019 [access: 2020/October/13]. Available from: Available from: htpp://www.mset.gov.jm/about-us

  37. NIHERST. About us. Trinidad and Tobago. NIHERST; 2019 access: 2020/October/13. Available from: htpp://www.niherst.gov.tt/about/about.html

  38. Macías-Chapula CA. Influence of local and regional publications in the production of public health research papers in Latin America. Scientometrics. 2010 access: 2020/October/13;84(3):703-16. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-009-0153-4

  39. Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Benavent-Pérez M, de Moya-Anegón F, Miguel S. International collaboration in Medical Research in Latin America and the Caribbean (2003-2007). J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2012;63(11):2223-38. DOI: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/asi.22669

  40. Unesco - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Unesco Science Report 2010: the current status of science around the world. Paris: Unesco; 2010.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com