Manrique P, Agurto A, Guerrero ME

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 36
Paginas: 144-154
Archivo PDF: 390.95 Kb.

RESUMEN

El propósito de este estudio fue comparar las distancias promedio desde los ápices radiculares de primeros molares, segundos molares y segundos premolares al canal mandibular según sexo en la población peruana mediante tomografía computarizada de haz cónico (TCHC). Se examinaron 80 tomografías CBCT de pacientes peruanos con edades comprendidas entre los 15 y 80 años. Luego de ubicar el canal mandibular, se realizaron mediciones de las distancias verticales desde el canal mandibular hasta el ápice de los segundos premolares mandibulares, así como de los primeros molares y segundos molares. Para el análisis estadístico se utilizó la prueba t de Student para muestras pareadas y no pareadas con un nivel de significación de p‹0,05. En el lado derecho, el segundo molar presentó una distancia media de 3,99mm para hombres y 2,87mm para mujeres; exhibiendo una diferencia significativa (p‹0.05). Al comparar bilateralmente, no se encontraron diferencias significativas (p›0.05) entre las distancias desde los ápices de los segundos premolares mandibulares y los primeros y segundos molares al canal mandibular. Sin embargo, para los segundos premolares y segundos molares en el lado izquierdo, los valores fueron más altos con un promedio de 5,52mm y 3,75mm, respectivamente. Las raíces mesiales de los segundos molares estaban más cerca del canal mandibular. Además, las mujeres mostraron distancias más cortas que los hombres.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Singh V. Textbook of Anatomy Head, Neckand Brain Volume III Second Edition. 2nd ed.India: Elsevier; 2014.

2. Kabak S.L., Zhuravleva N.V., MelnichenkoY.M. Topography of the mandibular nerve inhuman embryos and fetuses. an histomorphologicalstudy. J Oral Res. 2017; 6 (11): 291-8.

3. Wolf K.T., Brokaw E.J., Bell A., Joy A. Variantmandibular nerves and implications for localanesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2016; 63 (2): 84-90.

4. Puciło M., Lipski M., Sroczyk-JaszczyńskaM., Puciło A., Nowicka A. The anatomicalrelationship between the roots of eruptedpermanent teeth and the mandibular canal: asystematic review. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42 (5): 529-42.

5. Kabak S.L., Zhuravleva N.V., MelnichenkoY.M., Savrasova N.A. Сross-Sectional Anatomic Study of Direct Positional RelationshipsBetween Mandibular Canal and Roots ofPosterior Teeth Using Cone Beam ComputedTomography. J Oral Res. 2018; 7 (8): 292-8.

6. Libersa P., Savignat M. Neurosensory Disturbancesof the Mandibular nerve : A RetrospectiveStudy of Complaints in a 10-YearPeriod. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 1486-9.

7. Byun S., Kim S., Chung H., Lim H., HeiW., Woo J., et al. Surgical managementof damaged mandibular nerve caused byendodontic overfilling of calcium hydroxidepaste. Int Endod J. 2015; 1-10.

8. Yates J., Ali A.B.J. Risk of mandibular nerveinjury with coronectomy vs surgical extractionof mandibular third molars- A comparisonof two techniques and review of theliterature. J Oral Rehabil. 2018; 45: 250-7.

9. Castro R., Guivarc’h M., Foletti J.M., CatherineJ.H., Chossegros C., Guyot L. Endodontic-related mandibular nerve injuries: A reviewand a therapeutic flow chart. J Stomatol OralMaxillofac Surg. 2018; 119 (5): 412-8.

10. Doh R., Shin S., You T.M. Delayed paresthesiaof mandibular nerve after dental surgery :case report and related pathophysiology. JDent Anesth Pain Med. 2018; 18 (3): 177-82.

11. Tay A., J Z. Clinical characteristics of trigeminalnerve injury referrals to a universitycentre. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36:922-7.

12. Ahmad M. The Anatomical Nature of DentalParesthesia: A Quick Review. Open Dent J.2018; 12 (1): 155-9.

13. Pogrel M.A. Damage to the mandibular nerveas the result of root canal therapy. J Am DentAssoc. 2007; 138 (1): 65-9.

14. MacDonald D. Cone-beam computedtomography and the dentist. J Investig ClinDent. 2017; 8 (1): 1-6.

15. Nasseh I., Al-Rawi W. Cone Beam ComputedTomography. Dent Clin North Am. 2018;62 (3): 361-91.

16. García-Sanz V., Bellot-Arcís C., HernándezV., Serrano-Sánchez P., Guarinos J., Paredes-Gallardo V. Accuracy and Reliability ofCone-Beam Computed Tomography forLinear and Volumetric Mandibular CondyleMeasurements. A Human Cadaver Study. SciRep. 2017; 7 (1): 1-8.

17. Pagare S., Roy C., Vahanwala S., Gavand K.,Waghmare M., Goyal S. Estimation of mandibularnerve proximitytothe root api-ces : ACBVI analysis. Int J Dent Res. 2018; 6 (1): 13.

18. Srnivasan K., Mohammadi M., ShepherdJ. Applications of linac-mounted kilovoltageCone-beam Computed Tomography inmodern radiation therapy: A review. Polish JRadiol. 2014; 79: 181-93.

19. Hiremath H., Agarwal R., Hiremath V.,Phulambrikar T. Evaluation of proximityof mandibular molars and second premolarto mandibular nerve canal among centralIndians: A cone-beam computed tomographicretrospective study. Indian J Dent Res.

20. 2016; 27 (3): 312-6.20. Lvovsky A., Bachrach S., Kim H.C.,Pawar A., Levinzon O., Ben Itzhak J., et al.Relationship between Root Apices and theMandibular Canal: A Cone-beam ComputedTomographic Comparison of 3 Populations. JEndod. 2018; 44 (4): 555-8.

21. Choon O.W., Rahman S.A., Shaari R., AlamM.K. The validation of radiography imagesof romexis software. Int Med J. 2013; 20 (3):349-51.

22. Pääsky E., Suomalainen A., Ventä I. Arewomen more susceptible than men to iatrogenicmandibular nerve injury in dental implantsurgery? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 51(2): 251-6.

23. Marinescu Gava M., Suomalainen A., VehmasT., Ventä I. Did malpractice claims for faileddental implants decrease after introduction ofCBCT in Finland? Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23 (1): 399-404.

24. Sedaghatfar M., August M.A., Dodson T.B.Panoramic radiographic findings as predictorsof mandibular nerve exposure followingthird molar extraction. J Oral MaxillofacSurg. 2005; 63 (1): 3-7.

25. Tilotta-Yasukawa F., Millot S., El HaddiouiA., Bravetti P., Gaudy J.F. Labiomandibularparesthesia caused by endodontic treatment:an anatomic and clinical study. Oral Surgery,Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology.2006;102 (4).

26. Razumova S., Brago A., Howijieh A., BarakatH., Kozlova Y.R.N. Evaluation the Relationshipbetween Mandibular Molar Root Apicesand Mandibular Canal among Residents ofthe Moscow Population using Cone-BeamComputed Tomography Technique. ContempClin Dent. 2022; 13 (1): 3-8.

27. Oliveira A.C.S., Candeiro G.T.M., Pachecoda Costa F.F.N., Gazzaneo I.D., Alves F.R.F.,Marques F.V. Distance and Bone Densitybetween the Root Apex and the MandibularCanal: A Cone-beam Study of 9202 Rootsfrom a Brazilian Population. J Endod. 2019;45 (5): 538-542.e2.

28. Pearson A. The early innervation of thedeveloping deciduous teeth. J Anat. 1977;123(3): 563-77.

29. Krarup S., Darvann T.A., Larsen P., MarshJ.L., Kreiborg S. Three-dimensional analysisof mandibular growth and tooth eruption. JAnat. 2005; 207 (5): 669-82.

30. Björnerk A., Skieller V. Normal and abnormalgrowth of the mandible. A synthesis oflongitudinal cephalometric implant studiesover a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod. 1983;5 (1): 1-46.

31. Ahmed A.A., Ahmed R.M., Jamleh A.,Spagnuolo G. Morphometric analysis of themandibular canal, anterior loop, and mentalforamen: A cone-beam computed tomographyevaluation. Int J Environ Res PublicHealth. 2021; 18 (7): 1-11.

32. Simonton J.D., Azevedo B., Schindler W.G.,Hargreaves K.M. Age-and Gender-relatedDifferences in the Position of the Mandibularnerve by Using Cone Beam ComputedTomography. J Endod. 2009; 35 (7): 944-9.

33. Schierz O., Dommel S., Hirsch C., ReissmannD.R. Occlusal tooth wear in the generalpopulation of Germany: Effects of age,sex, and location of teeth. J Prosthet Dent.2014;112 (3): 465-71.

34. Bicaj T., Pustina T., Ahmedi E., Dula L., LilaZ., Tmava-Dragusha A., et al. The Relationbetween the Preferred Chewing Side andOcclusal Force Measured by T-Scan IIISystem. Open J Stomatol. 2015; 05 (04):95-101.

35. Gershenson A., Nathan H., Luchansky E. Mentalforamen and mental nerve: Changes with age.Acta Anat (Basel). 1986; 126 (1): 21-8.

36. Angel J.S., Mincer H.H., Chaudhry J.,Scarbecz M. Cone-beam Computed Tomographyfor Analyzing Variations in Inferior AlveolarCanal Location in Adults in Relation toAge and Sex. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56 (1):216-9.