medigraphic.com
Colegio de Medicina Interna de México.

2024, Número 04

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Med Int Mex 2024; 40 (04)


Relaciones jerárquicas de poder en la educación médica

Lugo MJA, Escobar MAL, Medina VE, García RPE

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 37
Paginas: 264-270
Archivo PDF: 344.89 Kb.


RESUMEN

Antecedentes: Las jerarquías son una forma de organización que estratifica a los individuos o grupos en función de la posesión jerárquica en un entorno determinado. La educación médica es un contexto social sumamente organizado, en el que el trabajo y el aprendizaje dependen de la interacción y, por tanto, están muy influidos por el poder social y la jerarquía.
Objetivo: Otorgar un acercamiento cualitativo del concepto, la historia y los aspectos implicados en las relaciones de poder de la educación en las residencias médicas.
Metodología: Estudio retrospectivo efectuado mediante una búsqueda no sistemática de la bibliografía en las bases de datos de PubMed, Elsevier y Google Académico sin restricción de tiempo, en español e inglés. Se seleccionaron los materiales gratuitos y, a criterio de los autores para cumplir el objetivo, la combinación de términos fue: “Hierarchical relations of power and medical education” “Relaciones jerárquicas de poder y educación médica”.
Resultados: Se encontraron 23,000 escritos, de los que se eligieron sin criterios de elección 19 que los autores consideraron pertinentes para su análisis.
Conclusiones: Es indispensable transitar de manera reflexiva a un concepto diferente al que señalan como jerarquía y que esta “jerarquía” esté impregnada de valores humanísticos, éticos y de buena habilidad de interacción social, posiblemente mejor denominado “liderazgo”.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Crowe S, Clarke N, Brugha R. ‘You do not cross them’:Hierarchy and emotion in doctors’ narratives of powerrelations in specialist training. Soc Sci Med 2017; 186: 70-7.doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.048

  2. Morales C. Real Academia Española, Diccionario de lalengua española, 21a ed. Versión en CD-ROM, Madrid,Espasa-Calpe, 1995. Rev Lexicogr 2019; 2: 157-61.

  3. Liberatore MJ, Nydick RL. The analytic hierarchy processin medical and health care decision making: A literaturereview. Eur J Oper Res 2008; 189 (1): 194-207.

  4. Starr P. The social origins of professional sovereignty. SocTransform Am Med 1982; 13-29.

  5. Cassell EJ. Historical perspective of medical residencytraining: 50 years of changes. JAMA 1999; 281 (13): 1231.doi:10.1001/jama.281.13.1231-JMS0407-6-1

  6. Sinclair S. Making Doctors. An Institutional Apprenticeship.New York: Routledge, 1997.

  7. Feinstein AR. System, supervision, standards, and the“epidemic” of negligent medical errors. Arch Int Med1997; 157: 1285-9.

  8. Walton MM. Hierarchies: The Berlin wall of patient safety.Quality Safety Health Care 2006; 15: 229-30.

  9. Garrison J, Boler M. Feeling power: Emotions and education.Educational Res 1999; 28: 33.

  10. Blackman L, Cromby J. Affect and feeling. Int J Crit Psychol2007; 21: 5-22.

  11. Ahmed S. The cultural politics of emotion. EdinburghUniversity Press 2013.

  12. Hemmings C. Invoking affect: Cultural theory and theontological turn. Cult Stud 2005; 19 (5): 548-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380500365473

  13. Finemam S, Sturdy A. The emotions of control: Aqualitative exploration of environmental regulation.Hum Relations 1999; 52 (5): 631-63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016982129781

  14. Babaria P, Abedin S, Berg D, Nunez-Smith M. “I’m too usedto it”: A longitudinal qualitative study of third year femalemedical students’ experiences of gendered encounters inmedical education. Soc Sci Med 2012; 74 (7): 1013-1020.doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.043

  15. Smith AC, Kleinman S. Managing emotions in medicalschool: Students’ contacts with the living and the dead.Soc Psychol Q 1989; 52 (1): 56-69. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/2786904

  16. Lempp H, Seale C. The hidden curriculum in undergraduatemedical education: Qualitative study of medical students’perceptions of teaching. Br Med J 2004; 329 (7469): 770-3.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7469.770

  17. Waring JJ. Beyond blame: Cultural barriers to medicalincident reporting. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60 (9): 1927-35. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.055

  18. Salas E, Dickinson T, Converse S, Tannenbaum S. Towardan understanding of team performance and training.Teams: Their training and performance. Am Psychol 1992;45 (2): 120-33.

  19. Salas E, Stagl KC, Burke CS, Goodwin GF. Fostering teameffectiveness in organizations: Toward an integrative theoreticalframework. En: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation,

  20. 2007: 185-243.20. Salas E, Sims DE, Shawn Burke C. Is there A “big five” in teamwork?Small Group Research 2005; 36: 555-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405277134

  21. Salamonson Y, Heere B van, Everett B, Davidson P. Voicesfrom the floor: Nurses’ perceptions of the medical emergencyteam. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2006; 22 (3): 138-43.doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2005.10.002

  22. Walker S, McGeer A, Simor AE, Armstrong-Evans M, LoebM. Why are antibiotics prescribed for asymptomaticbacteriuria institutionalized elderly people? CMAJ 2000;163 (3): 273-7.

  23. Dechurch LA, Hiller NJ, Murase T, Doty D, Salas E. Leadershipacross levels: Levels of leaders and their levels ofimpact. Leadership Quarterly 2010; 21: 1069-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009

  24. Morgeson FP, DeRue DS, Karam EP. Leadership in teams:A functional approach to understanding leadership structuresand processes. J Manage 2010; 36 (1): 5-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347376

  25. Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, Fraker DL, CzernieckiBJ, Rosato EF, et al. The impact of a multidisciplinarybreast cancer center on recommendationsfor patient management: The university of Pennsylvaniaexperience. Cancer 2001; 91 (7): 1231-7.doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010401)91:7<1231::aidcncr1123>3.0.co;2-k

  26. Reeves S, Rice K, Conn LG, Miller KL, Kenaszchuk C,Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional interaction, negotiationand non-negotiation on general internal medicinewards. J Interprof Care 2009; 23 (6): 633-45. doi:10.3109/13561820902886295

  27. Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, Nicholson D, Howse WR.Markers for enhancing team cognition in complex environments:The power of team performance diagnosis. AviatSpace Environ Med 2007; 78.

  28. Fiore SM, Schooler JW. Process mapping and shared cognition:Teamwork and the development of shared problemmodels. En: Team cognition: Understanding the factors thatdrive process and performance. 2005: 133-52.

  29. Gum L, Greenhill J, Dix K. Clinical simulation in maternity(CSiM): Interprofessional learning through simulationteam training. Qual Saf Heal Care 2010; 19 (5). https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2008.030767

  30. Hughes AM, Salas E. Hierarchical medical teams and thescience of teamwork. Virtual Mentor 2013; 15 (6): 829-33.doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2013.15.6.msoc1-1306

  31. Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E. Team performance and trainingin complex environments: Recent findings from appliedresearch. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1998; 7 (3): 83-7.

  32. Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse SA. Cognitive psychologyand team training: Training shared mental models andcomplex systems. Hum Factors Soc Bull 1990; 33 (12): 1-4.

  33. Rico R, Sánchez-Manzanares M, Gil F, Gibson C. Teamimplicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-basedapproach. Acad Manag Rev 2008; 33 (1): 163-84.

  34. Offner PJ, Heit J, Roberts R. Implementation of a rapidresponse team decreases cardiac arrest outside of theintensive care unit. J Trauma 2007; 62 (5): 1223-7. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31804d4968

  35. Tannenbaum SI, Cerasoli CP. Do team and individual debriefsenhance performance? A meta-analysis. Hum Factors2013; 55 (1): 231-45. doi: 10.1177/0018720812448394

  36. Morrison JE, Meliza LL. Foundations of the after actionreview process (special report 42). United States Army ResInst Behav Soc Sci 1999; 5.

  37. Darling MJ, Parry CS. After-action reviews: Linking reflectionand planning in a learning practice. Reflections SoL J 2001; 3(2): 64-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/15241730152695252




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com