medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3325 (Impreso)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz

2024, Número 6

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Salud Mental 2024; 47 (6)


Validity and Reliability of Turkish Language Version of Baby Preparation and Worry Scale

Erbil N, Alpaslan AM, Yildirim F

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 31
Paginas: 279-286
Archivo PDF: 654.07 Kb.


RESUMEN

Introducción. La Escala de Ansiedad y Preparación para el Bebé (Baby-PAWS) es la única escala que se centra en las preocupaciones prácticas de las futuras madres sobre la transición a la paternidad (poder cuidar al bebé, asegurar el cuidado infantil, el bienestar personal y la participación de la pareja), midiendo estos parámetros. Objetivo. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la validez y fiabilidad del Baby-PAWS, adaptándolo a la cultura turca. Método. En nuestro estudio metodológico se incluyeron 220 mujeres embarazadas mayores de 18 años que se encontraban en el tercer trimestre del embarazo. Se ha realizado la validez del contenido y del idioma del Baby-PAWS. Posteriormente los datos se obtuvieron mediante análisis factorial confirmatorio y explicativo, análisis de correlación y prueba del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Resultados. Se determinó que la forma turca Baby-PAWS no tenía tres subdimensiones como en el original y que la forma unidimensional Baby-PAWS era una herramienta de escala válida y confiable adecuada para la cultura turca. El coeficiente alfa de Cronbach de la escala revisada se determinó como .85. Discusión y conclusión. La versión turca del Baby-PAWS es una herramienta de medición adecuada en términos de lenguaje y validez de contenido y su estructura de un solo factor se puede aplicar a la cultura turca y puede identificar correctamente las preocupaciones de las futuras madres sobre el autocuidado y los problemas de pareja/relaciones, el cuidado personal y la dependencia de otros para cuidar al bebé después de nacer.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Abdi, F., Navidpour, F., & Dolatian, M. (2018). A Literature Review of PregnancyWorries and Stress Scales. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and BehavioralSciences, 12(3), e14581. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.14581

  2. Altıparmak, D., & Taş Arslan, F. (2016). Adaptation of family centred care scale toTurkish a validity and realiability study. Journal of Pediatric Research, 3(2),97-103. https://doi.org/10.4274/jpr.60566

  3. Arifin, S. R.M., Ismail, A. S., Samsudin, S., Hassan, N. A., & Mamat W.H., W.(2021). Prevalence and Factors Associated with the Depressive and AnxietySymptoms Amongst Antenatal Women. IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia, 20(1).https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v20i1.1772

  4. Bruinhof, N., Sehic, E., Hancock, G. R., Gartstein, M. A., & de Weerth, C. (2024).Prenatal anticipatory stress: Baby preparation and worry scale-revised inthe Dutch context. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 128, 152437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152437

  5. Çapık, C. (2014). Use of confirmatory factor analysis in validity and reliabilitystudies. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 17(3), 196-205.

  6. Çapık, C., Gözüm, S., & Aksayan, S. (2018). Intercultural scale adaptation stages,language and culture adaptation: Updated guide. Florence Nightingale Journalof Nursing, 26(3), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.26650/fnjn397481

  7. Centre of Perinatal Excellence. (2017). A guide for health professionals. Retrievedfrom https://cope.org.au.

  8. De Asis-Cruz, J., Krishnamurthy, D., Zhao, L., Kapse, K., Vezina, G., Andescavage,N., Quistorff, J., Lopez, C., & Limperopoulos, C. (2020). Association of PrenatalMaternal Anxiety With Fetal Regional Brain Connectivity. JAMA NetworkOpen, 3(12), e2022349. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22349

  9. Doty, M. S., Chen, H. Y., Ajishegiri, O., Sibai, B.M., Blackwell, S.C., & Chauhan,S. P. (2022). Daily meditation program for anxiety in individuals admitted tothe antepartum unit: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (MEDITATE).American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 4(3), 100562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100562

  10. Erdoğan, S., Nahcıvan, N., & Esin, N.M. (2014). Research process application andcritical in nursing. Nobel Medicine Bookstores.

  11. Erickson, N. L., Neumann, A. A., Hancock, G. R., & Gartstein M. A. (2020). Babypreparation and worry scale (Baby-PAWS): Instrument development andpsychometric evaluation. Early Human Development, 147, 105080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105080

  12. Frigerio A., & Nazzari, S. (2021). Antenatal maternal anxiety, maternal sensitivity andtoddlers' behavioral problems: An investigation of possible pathways. Early HumanDevelopment, 157, 105364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2021.105364

  13. Grigoriadis, S., Graves, L., Peer, M., Mamisashavili, L., Tomlinson, G., Vigod S. N.,Dennis, C.-L., Steiner, M., Brown, C., Cheung, A., Dawson, H., Rector, N. A.,Guenette, M., & Richter, M. (2018). Maternal anxiety during pregnancy andthe association with adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and metaanalysis.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 79(5):2-22. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.17r12011

  14. Jesus, L. M., & Valente, A. R. (2016). Cross-cultural adaptation of health assessmentinstruments. Portugal, University of Aveiro, 8, 1-5.

  15. Kartal, M., & Bardakçı, S. (2018). Reliability and validity analysis with SPSS andamos applied examples. Academician Bookstore.

  16. Kurt, G., & Arslan, H. (2021). Turkish version of the Pregnancy‐related AnxietyScale: A psychometric study. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 57(1), 157-166.https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12537

  17. Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states:Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the BeckDepression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3),335-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U

  18. Örücü, M. Ç., & Demir, A. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of perceived stress scale forTurkish university students. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Societyfor the Investigation of Stress, 25(1), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1218

  19. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2009). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidencefor nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

  20. Potur, D. C., Merih, Y. D., Külek, H., & Gürkan, Ö. C. (2015). Turkish validity andreliability study of the birth comfort scale. Anatolian Journal of Nursing andHealth Sciences, 18(4), 252-258.

  21. Rees, S., Channon, S., & Waters C. S. (2019). The impact of maternal prenataland postnatal anxiety on children’s emotional problems: a systematic review.European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(2), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1173-5

  22. Sariçam, H. (2018). The psychometric properties of Turkish version of DepressionAnxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in health control and clinical samples.Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, 7(1), 19-30.

  23. Uguz, F., Yakut, E., Aydogan S., Bayman M. G., & Gezginc K. (2019). The impactof maternal major depression, anxiety disorders and their comorbidities ongestational age, birth weight, preterm birth and low birth weight in newborns.Journal of Affective Disorders, 259, 382-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.076

  24. Versele, V., Stok, F. M., Dieberger, A., Deliens, T., Aerenhouts, D., Deforche, B.,Bogaerts, A., Devlieger, R., & Clarys, P. (2022). Determinants of Changesin Women’s and Men’s Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior acrossthe Transition to Parenthood: A Focus Group Study. International Journalof Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042421

  25. Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: applications usingmplus: methods and applications. West Susex: John Wiley & Sons.

  26. Weis, K. L., Walker, K. C., Chan, W., Yuan, T. T., & Lederman, R. P. (2020). Risk ofpreterm birth and newborn low birthweight in military women with increasedpregnancy-specific anxiety. Military Medicine, 185(5-6), e678-e685. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz399

  27. World Health Organisation [WHO]. (2020). International classification of diseases 11threvision (Diagnostic manual ICD-11). Retrieved from https://icd.who.int/en/

  28. Wu, Y., Lu, Y. C., Jacobs, M., Pradhan, S., Kapse, K., Zhao, L., Niforatos-Andescavage, N., Vezina, G., du Plessis, A. J., & Limperopoulos, C. (2020).Association of prenatal maternal psychological distress with fetal braingrowth, metabolism, and cortical maturation. JAMA Network Open, 3(1),e1919940-e1919940. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19940

  29. Yazıcı, E., Mutu Pek, T, Uslu Yuvacı, H., Köse, E, Cevrioglu, S., Yazıcı, A. B., Çilli,A. S., Erol, A., & Aydın, N. (2019). Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale validiyand reliability study in Turkish (PASS-TR validity and reliability). Psychiatryand Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(4), 609-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750573.2018.1506247

  30. Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Factor analysis and validity in social sciences: Usingexploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Istanbul UniversityFaculty of Business Administration, 46,74-85.

  31. Yöyen, E. G. (2016). A Turkish adaptation of short version of International PersonalityInventory-IPI: Reliability and validity analysis. International Journal of SocialSciences and Education Research, 2(4), 1058-1069. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.278983




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com