medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2988 (Impreso)

2022, Número 3

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Cubana Farm 2022; 55 (3)


Caracterización del proceso extractivo por maceración mediante un diseño factorial fraccionado en Nephelium lappaceum L.

Valdez LLL, Gutiérrez GYI, García MV, Nieto AOM

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 39
Paginas: 1-17
Archivo PDF: 855.87 Kb.


RESUMEN

Introduction: The extraction processes play a fundamental role in the initial studies of medicinal plants and are closely related to the quality and performance of active ingredients. The variety of phytochemicals that N. lappaceum L. has, arouses interest in carrying out studies focused on the development of extractive processes from the peel of the fruit, depending on the sweet and bitter varieties. In addition, the Ecuadorian species has not been studied.
Objective: To assess the effect and interactions of some variables that influence the extraction process by maceration applied to the shell of the fruits of the species N. lappaceum L.
Methods: A fractional factorial design 25-2, of resolution III, was developed with 3 replicas and 24 experimental runs. Five factors (particle size, extraction time, extraction conditions, species variety and extraction solvent) were evaluated on the variables pH responses and total solids, in the maceration extraction process. Statistical software DX-11.0 (State-easy Inc. Minneapolis) was used.
Results: In the experimental design, a desirability level of 97.10% was obtained, very close to 100%. This suggested that the best conditions for extraction by maceration from N. lappaceum L. are to work with a particle size of 0.5 mm, bitter variety, with stirring and the use of 80% hydroalcoholic mixture. The extraction time did not exert a significant effect on the extractive process. Significant differences were perceived in most of the physicochemical parameters evaluated to the estimated extracts of the design.
Conclusions: The results provide novel data on the extraction by maceration applied to the shell of the fruits of two varieties of N. lappaceum L. present in Ecuador, aspects that contribute to the scientific knowledge of this species.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Abubakar AR, Haque M. Preparation of medicinal plants: Basic extraction andfractionation procedures for experimental purposes. J Pharm Bioall Sci. 2020;12:1-10. DOI:10.4103/jpbs.JPBS-175-19

  2. Thorat HV, Harinath NM, Tamboli AF and Jadhav. A. novel extraction process use inmedicinal plants: a review. International Journal of Pharmacognosy (IJP). 2021;8(4):138-45. DOI: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.IJP.8(4).138-45

  3. Abu BFI, Abu BMF, Abdullah N, Endrini S and Fatmawati S. Optimization of extractionconditions of phytochemical compounds and anti-gout activity of Euphorbia hirta L. (AraTanah) using response surface methodology and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry(LC-MS) analysis. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2020;2020.DOI: 10.1155/2020/4501261

  4. Lezoul NEH, Belkadi M, Habibi F and Guillén F. Extraction processes with severalsolvents on total bioactive compounds in different organs of three medicinal plants.Molecules. 2020;25. DOI: 10.3390/molecules25204672

  5. Arias CME, Velazques RHA, Mateus CD, Chaparro ZHN, Orduz RJO. El rambután(Nephelium lappaceum), frutal asiático con potencial para Colombia: avances de lainvestigación en el piedemonte del Meta. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas.2016;10(2):262-272. DOI: 10.17584/rcch.2016v10i2.5761

  6. Mahmood K, Fazilah A, Yang TA, Sulaiman S, Kamilah H. Valorization of rambutan(Nephelium lappaceum) by-products: Food and non-food perspectives. International FoodResearch Journal (IFRJ). 2018 [acceso 03/01/2022];25(3):890-902. Disponible en:http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/25%20(03)%202018/(2)pdf

  7. Hernández C, Ascacio VJ, De la Garza H, Wong PJ, Aguilar CN, Martínez AGC, et al.Polyphenolic content, in vitro antioxidant activity and chemical composition of extract fromNephelium lappaceum L. (Mexican rambutan) husk. Asian Pacific journal of tropicalmedicine. 2017;10(12):1201-05. DOI: 10.1016/j.apjtm.2017.10.030

  8. Perumal A, AlSalhi MS, Kanakarajan S, Devanesan S. Phytochemical evaluation andanticancer activity of rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum) fruit endocarp extracts againsthuman hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG-2) cells. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences.2021;28:1816-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.12.027

  9. Sekar SN, Kumar DG, Jusof WHW, Hanafi M. A Review on Nephelium lappaceum L.Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017;10(8):1-9. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26227005

  10. Rakariyathama K, Zhoua D, Rakariyatham N, Shahidie F. Sapindaceae (Dimocarpuslongan and Nephelium lappaceum) seed and peel byproducts: Potential sources for phenoliccompounds and use as functional ingredients in food and health applications. Journal ofFunctional Foods. 2020;67:103846. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.103846

  11. Sukatta U, Rugthaworn P, Khanoonkon N, Anongjanya P, Kongsin K, Sukyai Prakit, etal. Rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum) peel extract: Antimicrobial and antioxidant activitiesand its application as a bioactive compound in whey protein isolate film Songklanakarin. J.Sci. Technol. 2021;43(1):37-44. DOI: 10.14456/sjst-psu.2021.6

  12. Hesam SM, Sun W, Khoshkharam M, Cheng Q. Rambutan, a tropical plant withethnopharmaceutical properties. Agrociencia. 2020 [acceso 03/01/2022];54(1):121-8.Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338914007

  13. Watkins ER and Newbold A. Factorial designs help to understand how psychologicaltherapy works. Front. Psychiatry. 2020;11:429. DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00429

  14. Miranda MM, Cuéllar AC. Manual de prácticas de laboratorio. Farmacognosia yproductos naturales. Ciudad Habana: Editorial Félix Varela; 2000. p. 25-49,74-79.

  15. Kuehl RO. Diseño de experimentos principios estadísticos de diseño y análisis deinvestigación. Thomson Editores, S.A; 2001.

  16. Gutiérrez H, de la Vara R. Análisis y diseño de experimentos. 3ra edición. México: MacGraw Hill Ed; 2012.

  17. NRSP 312. Norma Ramal. Medicamentos de origen vegetal. Extractos fluidos y tinturas.Métodos de ensayo. La Habana: Minsap; 1992. p. 15-19.

  18. Chlopicka J, Pasko P, Gorinstein S, Jedryas A, Zagrodzki P. Total phenolic and totalflavonoid content, antioxidant activity and sensory evaluation of pseudocereal breads. LWTFoodScience and Technology. 2012;46:548-55.

  19. Pourmorad F, Hosseinimerhr SJ, Shahabimajd N. Antioxidant activity, phenol andflavonoid contents of some selected Iranian medicinal plants. African Journal ofBiotechnology. 2006;5(11):1142-45.

  20. Benítez BR, Sarria VRA, Gallo CJA, Pérez PNO, Álvarez SJH & Giraldo ACI.Obtención y rendimiento del extracto etanólico de dos plantas medicinales. Revista FacultadDe Ciencias Básicas. 2020;15(1):31-8. DOI: 10.18359/rfcb.3597

  21. Golam RM. Conventional extraction methods use in medicinal plants, their advantagesand disadvantages. International Journal of Basic Sciences and Applied Computing(IJBSAC). 2018;2(6):10-4.

  22. Paridhee J, Shabnam Z, TamalKanti P, Abhijit S, Shibendu B and Shyamal B. Methodsfor preparing medicinal plant extracts: A review. International Journal of Current Research.2019;11(01):241-5. DOI: 10.24941/ijcr.33803.01.2019

  23. Monrroy M, Araúz O and García JR. Active compound identification in extracts of N.lappaceum peel and evaluation of antioxidant capacity. Hindawi. Journal of Chemistry.2020;2020. DOI: 10.1155/2020/4301891

  24. Nguyen K-NH, Nguyen N-VT, Kim KH. Determination of phenolic acids and flavonoidsin leaves, calyces, and fruits of Physalis angulata L. in Viet Nam. Pharmacia2021;68(2):501-9. DOI: 10.3897/pharmacia.68.e66044

  25. Bakar FIA, Bakar MFA, Abdullah N, Endrini S and Fatmawati S. Optimization ofextraction conditions of phytochemical compounds and anti-gout activity of Euphorbia hirtaL. (Ara Tanah) using response surface methodology and liquid chromatography-massspectrometry (LC-MS) analysis. Hindawi. Evidence-Based Complementary and AlternativeMedicine. 2020;2020. DOI: 10.1155/2020/4501261

  26. Handa SS. An Overview of extraction techniques for medicinal and aromatic plants.Chapter 1. En: Extraction technologies for medicinal and aromatic plants. Trieste, Italy:International Centre for Science and High Technology, ICS-UNIDO; 2008. p. 29.

  27. Liu W, Yin D, Li N, Hou X, Wang D, Li D, et al. Influence of environmental factors onthe active substance production and antioxidant activity in Potentilla fruticosa L. and itsquality assessment. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:28591. DOI: 10.1038/srep28591

  28. Zargoosh Z, Ghavam M, Bacchetta G & Tavili A. Effects of ecological factors on theantioxidant potential and total phenol content of Scrophularia striata Boiss ScientificReports. 2019;9:16021. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52605-8

  29. Yuliani SH, Sandrapitaloka AS, Restiana FR, Aji PDT, Gani MR, Riswanto FDO.Effects of particle size, extraction time, and solvent on daidzein yield extracted from tempeh.Jurnal Farmasi Sains Dan Komunitas. 2019;16(1):44-9. DOI: 10.24071/jpsc.001794

  30. Yeop A, Sandanasamy J, Fun PS, Abdullah S, Yusoff MM, Gimbun J. The effect ofparticle size and solvent type on the gallic acid yield obtained from Labisia pumila by ultrasonic extraction. MATEC Web of Conferences 111, 02008 (2017). Malaysia: Publisherby EDP Sciences, Malaysia FluidsChE; 2017. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20171110

  31. Duarte-Tujillo AS, Pineda-Insuasti JA. Influencia del tamaño de partícula, la agitación yel tiempo en la extracción de sustancias bioactivas de la seta ostra (Pleurotus ostreatus).Revista Biorrefinería. 2018 [acceso 26/01/2022];1(3):26-36. Disponible en:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331305855

  32. Ahmed M, Ramachandraiah K, Jiang GH and Bang EJ. Effects of ultra-sonication andagitation on bioactive compounds and structure of amaranth extract. Foods. 2020;9,1116.DOI: 10.3390/foods9081116

  33. Alara OR, Abdurahman NH, Ukaegbu CI. Extraction of phenolic compounds: A review.Current Research in Food Science. 2021;4:200-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.03.011

  34. Rin LY, Moon CH, Jin PE, Zhang M, Phuong DT, Wool LB, et al. Metabolite profilingof rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum L.) seeds using UPLC-qTOF-MS/MS and senomorphiceffects in aged human dermal fibroblasts. Nutrients. 2020;12:1430. DOI:10.3390/nu12051430

  35. Majid N, Nissar S, Younus RW, Nawchoo IA, Ali BZ. Pharmacognostic standardizationof Aralia cachemirica: a comparative study. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2021;7:33.DOI: 10.1186/s43094-021-00181-y

  36. Shin HJ, Choi SW, Ok G. Qualitative identification of food materials by complexrefractive index mapping in the terahertz range. Food Chemistry. 2018;245:282-8. DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.056

  37. Sepahpour S, Selamat J, Abdul MYM, Khatib A, Abdull AFR. Comparative analysis ofchemical composition, antioxidant activity and quantitative characterization of somephenolic compounds in selected herbs and spices in different solvent extraction systems.Molecules. 2018;23(402). DOI: 10.3390/molecules2302040

  38. Yunusa AK, Abdullahi N, Rilwan A, Abdulkadir AR, Dandago MA. DPPH radicalscavenging activitiy and total phenolic content of rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum) peeland seed. Annals. Food Science and Technology. 2018;19(4):774-9.

  39. Gusman JA, Tsai PJ. Extraction of antioxidant compounds from rambutan (Nepheliumlappaceum L.) peel as agricultural waste in Taiwan. Journal of Tropical Crop Science.2015;2(2):10-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com