medigraphic.com
ENGLISH

Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología

ISSN 3061-8142 (Digital)
ISSN 0484-7903 (Impreso)
  • Mostrar índice
  • Números disponibles
  • Información
    • Información general        
    • Directorio
  • Publicar
    • Instrucciones para autores        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Inicio
    • Índice de revistas            
    • Registro / Acceso
  • Mi perfil

2007, Número S1

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Mex Anest 2007; 30 (S1)


¿Qué es lo nuevo en técnicas de sedación para procesos ambulatorios?

White PF
Texto completo Cómo citar este artículo

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 26
Paginas: 33-36
Archivo PDF: 54.23 Kb.


PALABRAS CLAVE

Sin palabras Clave

FRAGMENTO

Sin resumen


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Bhananker SM, Posner KL, Cheney FW, et al. Injury and liability associated with monitored anesthesia care: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2006;104:228-34.

  2. Patel S, Vargo JJ, Khandwala F, et al. Deep sedation occurs frequently during elective endoscopy with meperidine and midazolam. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:2689-95.

  3. Rex DK, Heuss LT, Walker JA, Qi R. Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2005;129:1384-91.

  4. Vargo JJ, Zuccaro G, Dumot JA, et al. Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2002;123:8-16.

  5. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists: Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1004-17.

  6. Sá Rêgo MM, Watcha MF, White PF. The changing role of monitored anesthesia care in the ambulatory setting. Anesth Analg 1997;85:1020-1036.

  7. Meyers CJ, Eisig SB, Kraut RA. Comparison of propofol and methohexital for deep sedation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:448-452.

  8. Sá Rêgo MM, Inagaki Y, White PF. Cost-effectiveness of methohexital versus propofol for sedation during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg 1999;88:723-728.

  9. White PF, Vasconez LO, Mathes, et al. Comparison of midazolam and diazepam for sedation during plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:703-712.

  10. van Vlymen JM, Sá Rêgo MM, White PF. Benzodiazepine premedication: can it improve outcome in patients undergoing breast biopsy procedures: Anesthesiology 1999;90:740-7.

  11. White PF, Negus JB. Sedative infusions during local and regional anesthesia: a comparison of midazolam and propofol. J Clin Anesth 1991;3:32-39.

  12. Taylor E, Ghouri AF, White PF. Midazolam in combination with propofol for sedation during local anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 1992;4:213-216.

  13. Shao X, Li H, White PF, et al. Bisulfite-containing propofol: is it a cost-effective alternative to DiprivanTM for induction of anesthesia? Anesth Analg 2000;91:871-5.

  14. Song D, Hamza MA, White PF, et al. Comparison of a lower-lipid propofol emulsion with the standard emulsion for sedation during monitored anesthesia care. Anesthesiology 2004;100:1972-5.

  15. Egan TD, Kern SE, Johnson KB, et al. Propofol in a modified cyclodextrin formulation: first in man pharmacodynamics. Anesth Analg 2006;102:S297.

  16. Gibiansky E, Struys MM, et al. AQUAVAN injection, a water-soluble prodrug of propofol, as a bolus injection: A phase I dose-escalation comparison with DIPRIVAN (part 1): Pharmacokinetics. Anesthesiology 2005;103:718-29.

  17. Struys MM, Vanluchene AL, Gibiansky L, et al. AQUAVAN injection, a water-soluble prodrug of propofol, as a bolus injection: a phase I dose-escalation comparison with DIPRIVAN (part 2): Pharmacodynamics and safety. Anesthesiology 2005;103:730-43.

  18. White PF. Use of ketamine for sedation and analgesia during injection of local anesthetics. Ann Plast Surg 1985;15:53-56.

  19. Badrinath S, Avramov MN, Shadrick M, et al. The use of a ketamine-propofol combination during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg 2000;90:858-62.

  20. Frey K, Sukhani R, Pawlowski J, et al. Propofol versus propofol-ketamine for retrobulbar nerve block: comparison of sedation quality, intraocular pressure changes, and recovery profiles. Anesth Analg 1999;89:317-21.

  21. Greilich PE, Virella CD, Rich JM, et al. Remifentanyl versus meperidine for monitored anesthesia care: a comparison study in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy. Anesth Analg 2001;92:80-4.

  22. Smith I, Avramov MN, White PF. A comparison of propofol and remifentanyl during monitored anesthesia care. J Clin Anesth 1997;9:148-154.

  23. Avramov MN, Smith I, White PF. Interactions between midazolam and remifentanyl during monitored anesthesia care. Anesthesiology 1996;85:1283-1289.

  24. Arain SR, Ebert TJ. The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation. Anesth Analg 2002;95:461-6.

  25. Jalowiecki P, Rudner R, Gonciarz M, et al. Sole use of dexmedetomidine has limited utility for conscious sedation during outpatient colonoscopy. Anesthesiology 2005;103:269-73.

  26. Tang J, Wang B, White PF, et al. Comparison of the sedation and recovery profiles of Ro 48-6791, anew benzodiazepine, and midazolam in combination with meperidine for outpatient endoscopic procedures. Anesth Analg 1999;89:893-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Anest. 2007;30

ARTíCULOS SIMILARES

CARGANDO ...