medigraphic.com
ENGLISH

Medicina Crítica

  • Mostrar índice
  • Números disponibles
  • Información
    • Información general        
    • Directorio
  • Publicar
    • Instrucciones para autores        
  • Políticas
  • Lineamientos
  • medigraphic.com
    • Inicio
    • Índice de revistas            
    • Registro / Acceso
  • Mi perfil

2026, Número 3

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Med Crit 2026; 40 (3)


Evaluación de la congestión venosa sistémica mediante ecocardiografía transesofágica (T-VExUS): descripción de la técnica desde la presentación de un caso

Calderón GJA
Texto completo Cómo citar este artículo 10.35366/123725

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/123725
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/123725
Artículos similares

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 37
Paginas: 238-246
Archivo PDF: 3300.07 Kb.


PALABRAS CLAVE

congestión venosa sistémica, ultrasonido, VExUS, ultrasonido en el punto de atención, T-VExUS, ecocardiografía crítica.

RESUMEN

La congestión venosa sistémica es un factor de morbilidad y mortalidad en la insuficiencia cardiaca y otras condiciones críticas que pueden identificarse mediante ultrasonografía transtorácica y abdominal a través del protocolo VExUS con el objetivo de predecir el desarrollo de insuficiencia renal aguda después de cirugía cardiaca, entre otras utilidades, en el paciente de la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos a través del Doppler de las venas hepáticas, porta e intrarrenales. Los entornos en los que se utiliza varían, pero hay poca información a nivel mundial sobre este examen con ecocardiografía transesofágica (T-VExUS) como complemento al enfoque crítico del paciente en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Este artículo tiene el objetivo de mostrar, a través de un caso clínico, la técnica para su realización y sus posibles beneficios sobre el método tradicional.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Koratala A, Romero-González G, Soliman-Aboumarie H,Kazory A. Unlocking the potential of VExUS in assessingvenous congestion: the art of doing it right. Cardiorenal Med. 2024;14(1):350-374. doi: 10.1159/000539469.

  2. Mullens W, Abrahams Z, Francis GS, Sokos G, Taylor DO,Starling RC, et al. Importance of venous congestion forworsening of renal function in advanced decompensated heartfailure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(7):589-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.068.

  3. Lucas C, Johnson W, Hamilton MA, Fonarow GC, Woo MA,Flavell CM, et al. Freedom from congestion predicts good survival despite previous class IV symptoms of heart failure. AmHeart J. 2000;140(6):840-847. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.110933.

  4. Ambrosy AP, Pang PS, Khan S, Konstam MA, Fonarow GC,Traver B, et al. Clinical course and predictive value of congestionduring hospitalization in patients admitted for worsening signsand symptoms of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction:findings from the EVEREST trial. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(11):835-843. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs444.

  5. Lala A, McNulty SE, Mentz RJ, Dunlay SM, Vader JM,AbouEzzeddine OF, et al. Relief and recurrence of congestionduring and after hospitalization for acute heart failure: insightsfrom Diuretic Optimization Strategy Evaluation in AcuteDecompensated Heart Failure (DOSE-AHF) and CardiorenalRescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure(CARESS-HF). Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8(4):741-748. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001957.

  6. Rubio-Gracia J, Demissei BG, Ter Maaten JM, Cleland JG,O’Connor CM, Metra M, et al. Prevalence, predictors andclinical outcome of residual congestion in acute decompensatedheart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2018;258:185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.067.

  7. Catalano D, Caruso G, DiFazzio S, Carpinteri G, Scalisi N,Trovato GM. Portal vein pulsatility ratio and heart failure. JClin Ultrasound. 1998;26(1):27-31. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199801)26:1< 27::aid-jcu6> 3.0.co;2-8.

  8. Beaubien-Souligny W, Benkreira A, Robillard P, BouabdallaouiN, Chassé M, Desjardins G, et al. Alterations in portal vein flowand intrarenal venous flow are associated with acute kidneyinjury after cardiac surgery: a prospective observational cohortstudy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(19):e009961. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009961.

  9. Iida N, Seo Y, Sai S, Machino-Ohtsuka T, Yamamoto M, Ishizu T,et al. Clinical implications of intrarenal hemodynamic evaluationby Doppler ultrasonography in heart failure. JACC Heart Fail.2016;4(8):674-682. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.03.016.

  10. Beaubien-Souligny W, Rola P, Haycock K, Bouchard J,Lamarche Y, Spiegel R, et al. Quantifying systemic congestionwith Point-Of-Care ultrasound: development of the venousexcess ultrasound grading system. Ultrasound J. 2020;12(1):16.doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00163-w.

  11. Assavapokee T, Rola P, Assavapokee N, Koratala A. DecodingVExUS: a practical guide for excelling in point-of-care ultrasoundassessment of venous congestion. Ultrasound J. 2024;16(1):48.doi: 10.1186/s13089-024-00398-7.

  12. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD,Chandrasekaran K, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographicassessment of the right heart in adults: a report from theAmerican Society of Echocardiography endorsed by theEuropean Association of Echocardiography, a registered branchof the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Societyof Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(7):685-713.

  13. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, ErnandeL, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantificationby echocardiography in adults: an update from the AmericanSociety of Echocardiography and the European Associationof Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging.2015;16(3):233-271.

  14. Khandwalla R, Kimchi A. The efficacy of sonographicmeasurement of inferior vena cava diameter as an estimate ofcentral venous pressure. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2016;14(1):33.doi: 10.1186/s12947-016-0076-1.

  15. Koratala A. Pitfalls of inferior vena cava M-mode. NephroPOCUS.2020. Disponible en: https://nephropocus.com/2020/07/10/pitfalls-of-inferior-vena-cava-m-mode/

  16. Goldhammer E, Mesnick N, Abinader EG, Sagiv M. Dilatedinferior vena cava: a common echocardiographic finding in highlytrained elite athletes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12(11):988-993.

  17. Via G, Tavazzi G, Price S. Ten situations where inferior vena cavaultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness:a physiologically based point of view. Intensive Care Med.2016;42(7):1164-1167. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4357-z.

  18. Wachsberg RH, Sebastiano LLS, Levine CD. Narrowing of theupper abdominal inferior vena cava in patients with elevatedintraabdominal pressure. Abdom Imaging. 1998;23(1):99-102.doi: 10.1007/s002619900295.

  19. Rola P, Haycock K, Spiegel R. What every intensivist shouldknow about the IVC. J Crit Care. 2024;80:154455. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154455.

  20. Seo Y, Iida T, Yamamoto Y, Ishizu T, Kato M, Kawano T, et al.Estimation of central venous pressure using the ratio of shortto long diameter from cross-sectional images of the inferiorvena cava. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30(5):461-467. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2016.12.002.

  21. Pinto FJ, Wranne B, St Goar FG, Schnittger I, PoppRL. Hepaticvenous flow assessed by transesophagealechocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17(7):1493-1498.doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90637-o.

  22. von Herbay A, Frieling T, Haussinger D. Association betweenduplex Doppler sonographic flow pattern in right hepatic vein andvarious liver diseases. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;29(1):25-30.

  23. Pinto FJ, Wranne B, St Goar FG, Schnittger I, Popp RL.Systemic venous flow during cardiac surgery examined byintraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol.1992;69(4):387-393. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90239-u.

  24. Eljaiek R, Cavayas YA, Rodrigue E, Desjardins G, Lamarche Y,Toupin F, et al. High postoperative portal venous flow pulsatilityindicates right ventricular dysfunction and predicts complicationsin cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(2):206-214.doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.028.

  25. Denault AY, Azzam MA, Beaubien-Souligny W. Imaging portalvenous flow to aid assessment of right ventricular dysfunction.Can J Anesth. 2018;65(11):1260-1261. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1125-z.

  26. Beaubien-Souligny W, Eljaiek R, Fortier A, Lamarche Y,Liszkowski M, Bouchard J, et al. The association betweenpulsatile portal flow and acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery:a retrospective cohort study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth.2018;32(4):1780-1787. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.11.011.

  27. Denault AY, Beaubien-Souligny W, Elmi-Sarabi M, Eljaiek R,El-Hamamsy I, Lamarche Y, et al. Clinical significance of portalhypertension diagnosed with bedside ultrasound after cardiacsurgery. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(4):1109-1115. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001812.

  28. Martin KC, Gill EA, Douglas IJ, Siegel GS, Longino A, Burke J, etal. Evaluation of a modified venous excess ultrasound (VExUS)protocol for estimation of venous congestion: a cohort study.Ultrasound J. 2025;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13089-025-00411-x.

  29. Sakai M, Yoshida K, Shirai K, Kitano F, Shibagaki Y, YazawaM. Nephrology-oriented point of care ultrasound educationand subsequence: clinical usefulness for nephrology fellowsfrom a Japanese teaching hospital. Nephrology (Carlton).2025;30(6):e70060. doi: 10.1111/nep.14392.

  30. Wong A, Spiegel R, Elhassan M, Rola P, Al-Saeed M, AmadorEDO, et al. Utility of the Venous Excess Ultrasound (VEXUS)score to track dynamic change in volume status in patientsundergoing fluid removal during haemodialysis—the ACUVEXstudy. Ultrasound J. 2024;16(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13089-024-00373-w.

  31. Gudiño-Bravo P, Posada-Martínez EL, Cano-Nieto MM, Ibarra-Marquez ND, Leal-Escobar G, Madero M, et al. Ultrasonographicevaluation of systemic venous congestion in maintenancehemodialysis patients during fluid removal. Blood Purif.2025;54(1):62-70. doi: 10.1159/000542012.

  32. Kararmaz A, Kemal-Arslantas M, Cinel I. Renal resistiveindex measurement by transesophageal echocardiography:comparison with translumbar ultrasonography and relation toacute kidney injury. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(4):875-880. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.11.018.

  33. Bandyopadhyay S, Das RK, Paul A, Bhunia KS, Roy D.A transesophageal echocardiography technique to locatethe kidney and monitor renal perfusion. Anesth Analg.2013;116(3):549-554. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827ab3b1.

  34. Kashani K, Omer T, Shaw AD. The intensivist’s perspective ofshock, volume management, and hemodynamic monitoring. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;17(5):706-716. doi: 10.2215/CJN.14191021.

  35. Vieillard-Baron A, Auguarde R, Prin S, Page B, BeauchetA, Jardin F. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge ofvolume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med.2004;30(9):1734-1739.

  36. Vignon P, Repessé X, Bégot E, Léger J, Jacob C, BouferracheK, et al. Comparison of echocardiographic indices used to predictfluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit CareMed. 2017;195(10):1022-1032.

  37. Cheong I, Tai J, Chen J, Chew MS, Ho CH, Lee JH. Evaluatingthe utility of portal vein pulsatility index for detecting fluidunresponsiveness in the Intensive Care Unit. J Cardiothorac VascAnesth. 2023;37(9):1677-1682. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.05.016.










CC BY-NC-ND

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Crit. 2026;40

ARTíCULOS SIMILARES

CARGANDO ...