Entrar/Registro  
INICIO ENGLISH
 
Cirujano General
   
MENÚ

Contenido por año, Vol. y Num.

Índice de este artículo

Información General

Instrucciones para Autores

Mensajes al Editor

Directorio






>Revistas >Cirujano General >Año 2007, No. 2


Varela GG, López-Loredo A
Hemorroidopexia con engrapadora circular. Experiencia de 65 casos en el Centro Médico ABC
Cir Gen 2007; 29 (2)

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 43
Paginas: 117-124
Archivo PDF: 131.17 Kb.


Texto completo




RESUMEN

Objetivo: Presentar la experiencia inicial en el manejo de la enfermedad hemorroidal grado III y IV con el uso de la engrapadora circular (PPH, por sus siglas en inglés).
Sede: Centro de atención de tercer nivel.
Diseño: Estudio prospectivo, longitudinal, descriptivo.
Análisis estadístico: Porcentajes como medida de resumen para variables cualitativas.
Material y métodos: 65 pacientes con hemorroides grado III- IV en un periodo de 2 años. Se interrogó a los pacientes a las 12, 24, 48 y 72 horas del postoperatorio y a los 7 días, evaluando dolor en general y dolor al evacuar utilizando la escala de Mankoski, presencia de sangrado, reintegración a sus actividades habituales y satisfacción con el procedimiento.
Resultados: La sintomatología principal fue sangrado (75.38%), y prolapso (63.07%). A las 24 horas, 8 pacientes (12.3%) requerían analgésicos con horario (Mankoski 4 o mayor), a las 48 horas, 90% no tomaban analgésicos (Mankoski 3 o menos). Durante la primera evacuación, 17 (26.15%) pacientes refirieron 4 o más en la escala de Mankoski, por lo que requirieron de analgésicos. La principal complicación observada fue sangrado en 5 (7.69%) pacientes.
Conclusiones: Los resultados obtenidos muestran que se trata de un procedimiento seguro, que ofrece al paciente una recuperación prácticamente sin dolor, más rápida y con una reintegración a sus actividades habituales en corto tiempo.


Palabras clave: Enfermedad hemorroidal, prolapso, engrapadora PPH, hemorroidopexia.


REFERENCIAS

  1. Holley CJ. History of hemorrhoidal surgery. South Med J 1946; 39: 536-41.

  2. Madoff RD. Biblical Management of anorectal disease. Presentado en la Midwest Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Meeting. Marzo 1991, Breckenridge, CO.

  3. Racouchot JE, Pétouraud CH, Riovoire J. Saint Fiacre: The healer of haemorrhoids and patron saint of proctology. Am J Proctol 1971; 22: 175-9.

  4. Thomson WH. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975; 62: 542-52.

  5. Morgado PJ, Suárez JA, Gómez LG, Morgado PJ. Histoclinical basis for a new classification of hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 3: 474-80.

  6. Nisar PJ, Scholefield JH. Managing haemorrhoids. BMJ 2003; 327: 847-51.

  7. Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation: an epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology 1990; 98: 380-6.

  8. Charrúa GL. Enfermedad hemorroidaria. En: Murguía DD (ed.). Gastroenterología y hepatología práctica. México, DF. Ed. Intersistemas Editores; 1999: 153-7.

  9. Faccini M, Zuccon W, Caputo P, Gavezzoli D, Manelli A, Bonandrini L. Hemorrhoids: epidemiology and correlation with chronic constipation. Ann Ital Chir 2001; 72: 337-40.

  10. Milligan ETC, Morgan CN, Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal, and the operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet 1937; 230: 1119-24.

  11. Ferguson JA, Mazier WP, Ganchrow MI, Friend WG. The closed technique of hemorrhoidectomy. Surgery 1971; 70: 480-4.

  12. Tajana A. Hemorrhoidectomy according to Milligan-Morgan: ligature and excision technique. Int Surg 1989; 74: 158-61.

  13. Muldoon JP. The completely closed hemorrhoidectomy: a reliable and trusted friend for 25 years. Dis Colon Rectum 1981; 24: 211-4.

  14. McConnell JC, Khubchandani IT. Long-term follow-up of closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1983; 26: 797-9.

  15. Ganchrow MI, Mazier WP, Friend WG, Ferguson JA. Hemorrhoidectomy revisited —a computer analysis of 2038 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1971; 14: 128-33.

  16. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. 1998. Rome: Mundozzi Editor; 1998: 777-84.

  17. Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1049-53.

  18. Beattie GC, Lam JPH, Loudon MA. A prospective evaluation of the introduction of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2000; 2: 137-42.

  19. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW. Experience of 3,711 stapled heamorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 226-30.

  20. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, Eu KW. Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1449-55.

  21. Peng BC, Jayne DG, Ho YH. Randomized trial of rubber band ligation vs stapled hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed piles. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 291-297.

  22. Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, Seow-Choen F. Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piles: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3: 175-8.

  23. Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 782-5.

  24. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 779-81.

  25. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1376-81.

  26. Khalil KH, O´Bichere A, Sellu D. Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1352-5.

  27. Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien PA. Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 337-40.

  28. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 669-74.

  29. Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, Gioffi U, de Simone M, Salamina G, et al. Randomized controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 64-8.

  30. Correa-Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Miranda-Gomez A, Moran S. Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1367-75.

  31. Pavlidis T, Papaziogas B, Souparis A, Patsas A, Koutelikdakis I, Papaziogas T. Modern stapled Longo procedure vs conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2002; 17: 50-3.

  32. Cheetham MJ, Cohen CR, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 491-97.

  33. Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I. Day-case stapled (circular) vs diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 93-9.

  34. Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, Lombardi A, Bambini C, Renda A. Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 2003; 27: 203-207.

  35. Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA. Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1437-44.

  36. Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Landeri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A. Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19: 239-44.

  37. Arnaud JP, Pessaux P, Huten N, De Manizini N, Tuech JJ, Laurent B, et al. Treatment of hemorrhoids with circular stapler, a new alternative to conventional methods: a prospective study of 140 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 193: 161-5.

  38. Schmidt MP, Fishbein J, Shatavi H. Stapler haemorrhoidectomy versus conventional procedures, a clinical study. Zentralbl Chir 2002; 127: 15-18.

  39. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V, Boccasanta P, Bottini C, Carriero A. Complications after stapled haemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 2002; 6: 83-8.

  40. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 355: 810.

  41. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Sallustio PL, Martino P, De Fazio M, Memeo V. Long-term effects of stapled haemorrhoidectomy on internal anal function and sensitivity. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1487-91.

  42. Ripetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A. Rectal perforation, retropneumoperitoneum and pneumomediastinum after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case and subsequent considerations. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 268-70.

  43. Oughriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL. Complications of stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2005; 29: 429-33.



>Revistas >Cirujano General >Año2007, No. 2
 

· Indice de Publicaciones 
· ligas de Interes 






       
Derechos Resevados 2019