medigraphic.com
ENGLISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Mostrar índice
  • Números disponibles
  • Información
    • Información general        
    • Directorio
  • Publicar
    • Instrucciones para autores        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Inicio
    • Índice de revistas            
    • Registro / Acceso
  • Mi perfil

2006, Número 4

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Mex Urol 2006; 66 (4)


Las revistas médicas y la metodología de sus escritos. Conocimiento científico médico

Sosa MMC, Pablos HJL, Martínez SMC
Texto completo Cómo citar este artículo Artículos similares

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 39
Paginas: 205-212
Archivo PDF: 185.34 Kb.


PALABRAS CLAVE

Publicaciones seriales, fuentes de información, Medicina basada en evidencia, traslación de conocimiento.

RESUMEN

El presente artículo de esta serie tiene como finalidad hablar sobre la relación entre los conocimientos médicos y su aplicación en la práctica clínica. Entre las múltiples clasificaciones del conocimiento médico, sobresalen dos: una sobre el nivel de conocimiento y la otra sobre la conciencia que tiene el clínico sobre sus conocimientos. Para obtener respuesta a un cuestionamiento médico es necesario plantear una “pregunta clínica bien formulada”. Asimismo, se presentan algunos estudios realizados para determinar los requerimientos de información del clínico y la forma en que el médico los actualiza mediante libros, cursos y revistas médicas, en particular sus preferencias por distintos tipos de artículos y cómo los utiliza para valorarlos. A continuación, explicamos brevemente el paradigma de la Medicina basada en evidencias (MBE), los cambios que introduce en la práctica de la medicina, cómo jerarquiza las evidencias procedentes de revistas médicas y los pasos para que el médico pueda practicarla.
Finalmente, se mencionan algunos aspectos de la problemática de la traslación de los conocimientos entre la teoría y la praxis médica.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. 3a ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2005.

  2. Richardson WS. Ask, and ye shall retrieve [EBM note]. Evidence-Based Medicine 1998;3:100–1. En: Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. 3a ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2005.

  3. Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. JAMA. 1993; 270:2093-5.

  4. Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RSA. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence- based decisions [editorial]. ACP J Club. 1995; 123:A12-A13.

  5. Wyatt JC. 1. Clinical questions and information needs. J R Soc Med. 2000;93(4):168-71.

  6. Sackett DL, Straus SE. Finding and applying evidence during clinical rounds: the “evidence cart”. JAMA. 1998;280:1336-8.

  7. McKibbon A, Hunt D, Richardson S, Hayward R, Wilson M, Jaeschke R, Haynes B, Wyer P, Craig J, Guyatt G. 1A1. Finding the evidence. En: Guyatt GH, Rennie D [eds] for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. User’s guide to the medical literature: Essentials of evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago USA: AMA Press:2002 (5th printing);13-47.

  8. Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:596-9.

  9. Osheroff JA, Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Bankowitz RA, Blumenfeld BH, Miller RA. Physicians’ information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:576-81.

  10. Barrie AR, Ward AM. Questioning behaviour in general practice: a pragmatic study. BMJ. 1997;315:1515.

  11. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, Bergus GR, Levy BT, Chambliss ML, Evans ER. Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care. BMJ. 1999;319:358-361.

  12. Smith R. What clinical information do doctors need? BMJ. 1996;313:1062-8.

  13. Shaughnessy AF, Slawson DC, Bennett JH. Becoming an information master: a guidebook to the medical information jungle. J Fam Pract. 1994;39:489-99.

  14. Wyatt JC, Anagnostelis B. 2. Reference material: books and multimedia packages. J R Soc Med. 2000; 93(5):244-6.

  15. Haynes RB, Sackett RB, Gray JMA, Cook DC, Guyatt GH. Transferring evidence from research into practice. I: the role of clinical care research evidence in clinical decisions. ACP Journal Club. Nov- Dec 1996; 125:A-14-15.

  16. Wyatt JC. Use and sources of medical knowledge. Lancet. 1991;338:1368-73.

  17. Stinson ER, Mueller DA. Survey of health professionals’ information habits and needs. JAMA. 1980;243: 140-3.

  18. Colglazier ML. The causal relationship between clinical activity and journal use in a hospital library as analyzed by multiple regression. Bull Med Libr. 1996;84(4):569-71.

  19. Roland CG, Kirkpatrick RA. Time lapse between hypothesis and publication in the medical sciences. N Engl J Med. 1975;292:1273-6.

  20. Williamson JW, German PS, Weiss R, Skinner EA, Bowes III F. Health science information management and continuing education of physicians. A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. Ann Int Med. 1989;110:151-60.

  21. Sievert ME, McKinin EJ, Johnson ED, Reid JC, Mitchell JA. Beyond relevance -characteristics of key papers for clinicians: an exploratory study in an academic setting. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996;84(3):351-8.

  22. Kuller AB, Wessel CB, Ginn DS, Martin TP. Quality filtering of the clinical literature by librarians and physicians. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993;81(1):38-53.

  23. Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chilcago, Ill: University of Chicago Press;1970.

  24. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-Based Medicine: A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268(17):2420-5.

  25. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2a ed. Londres: BMJ Publishing Group;2001.

  26. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. The science of reviewing research. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;703:125-34.

  27. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis D, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;153:1423-43.

  28. Davis D, Evans M, Jadad A, Perrier L, D, Ryan D, Sibbald G, Straus S, Rappolt S, Wowk M, Zwarenstein M. The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ. 2003;327:33-5.

  29. Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Guyatt G, Tugwell P [eds]. Clinical epidemiology: How to do clinical practice research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 3rd Bk&C ed.

  30. Wyatt JC. 5. Reading journals and monitoring the published work. J R Soc Med. 2000;93(8):423-7.

  31. Levine M, Walter S, Haines T, Holbrook A, Moyer V. Users’ guides to the medical literature. IV. How to use an article about harm. JAMA. 1994;271(20):1615-9.

  32. Guyatt GH, Rennie D [eds] for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. User’s guide to the medical literature: Essentials of evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago USA: AMA Press:2002 (5th printing).

  33. Guyatt GH, Keller JL, Jaeschke R, Rosenbloom D, Adachi J, Newhouse MT. The n-of-1 randomized controlled trial: clinical usefulness. Our three-year experience. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:293-9.

  34. Bero L, Rennie D. The Cochrane collaboration: Preparing, maintaining and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. JAMA. 1995; 274(24):1935-8

  35. Effective practice and organization of care group. The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, Update Software, Oxford 2004. En: Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. 3a ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2005. 36. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Knowledge translation framework. (accessed 26 August, 2002). En: Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. 3a ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone 2005.

  36. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003;362:1225-30. En: Davis D, Evans M, Jadad A, Perrier L, D, Ryan D, Sibbald G, Straus S, Rappolt S, Wowk M, Zwarenstein M. The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ. 2003;327:33-5.

  37. Choi BCK. Understanding the basic principles of knowledge translation. J Epidemiol Comm Health. 2005; 59(2):93. 2003;327:33-5.

  38. Froese R, Pauly D [eds]. FishBase. Glossary searched term: metadatabase. http://www.fishbase.org/ Glossary/Glossary.cfm?TermEnglish=metadatabase (acces-sed 2 Mar 2004). En: Choi BCK. Understanding the basic principles of knowledge translation. J Epidemiol Comm Health. 2005;59(2):93. 2003;327:33-5.

  39. Hemmings J, Wilkinson J. What is a public health observatory? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003; 57:324-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2006;66

ARTíCULOS SIMILARES

CARGANDO ...