medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Digital)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Impreso)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2010, Número 3

<< Anterior

Acta Ortop Mex 2010; 24 (3)


Polietileno
Segunda Parte

Lavernia CJ, Cardona D, Alcerro JC

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 51
Paginas: 197-204
Archivo PDF: 215.31 Kb.


FRAGMENTO

Introducción

En el primer apartado de esta revisión histórica detallada de todos los aspectos clínicamente relevantes relacionados al polietileno iniciamos con el recuento de datos que se remontan a su descubrimiento y desarrollo. Posteriormente analizamos los aspectos técnicos de su fabricación, clasificación y los diferentes métodos de producción. En este último apartado iniciaremos presentando los detalles relevantes relacionados con la composición química, características mecánicas, tribología, verificación del desgaste y disponibilidad, para finalmente enfocarnos en los últimos avances y sus tendencias.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Harris WH, Muratoglu OK: A review of current cross-linked polyethylenes used in total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res Jan 2005; (430): 46-52.

  2. Heisel C, Silva M, Schmalzried TP: Bearing surface options for total hip replacement in young patients. Instr Course Lect 2004; 53: 49-65.

  3. Kurtz SM: The UHMWPE Handbook: Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene In Total Joint Replacement. San Diego California: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.

  4. Li S, Callaghan JJ: Polyethylene; chapter 7 in “The Adult Hip”. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998: 2.

  5. Jasty M, Rubash HE, Muratoglu O: Highly cross-linked polyethylene: the debate is over-in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(4 Suppl 2): 55-58.

  6. Collier JP, Currier BH, Kennedy FE, et al: Comparison of cross-linked polyethylene materials for orthopaedic applications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (414): 289-304.

  7. Ayers DC: Maximizing ultra high molecular weight polyethylene performance in total knee replacement. Instr Course Lect 2001; 50: 421-429.

  8. Harris WH: Cross-linked polyethylene: why the enthusiasm? Instr Course Lect 2001; 50: 181-184.

  9. Costa L, Braco P, Kurtz SM: Oxidation in contemporary packaged polyethylene. Journal of Applied Biomaterials 2005: 3.

  10. Ries MD: Enhanced polyethylene implants: have we been there before? Instr Course Lect 2005; 54: 189-192.

  11. Schmalzried TP, Callaghan JJ: Current concepts review wear in total hip and kneed replacements. JBJS Am January 1999; 81: 115-136.

  12. Bezwada HP: Acetabular wear in total hip arthroplasty. E-Medicine.com 2004: 1-15.

  13. Della Valle AG, Rana A, Furman B, Sculco TP, Salvati EA: Backside wear is low in retrieved modern, modular, and nonmodular acetabular liners. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 440: 184-191.

  14. Wang ML, Sharkey PF, Tuan RS: Particle bioreactivity and wear-mediated osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(8): 1028-1038.

  15. McCalden RW, Naudie DD, Yuan X, Bourne RB: Radiographic methods for the assessment of polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87(10): 2323-2334.

  16. Santavirta S, Bohler M, Harris WH, et al: Alternative materials to improve total hip replacement tribology. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74(4): 380-388.

  17. Engh CAS, Leung S, Kitamura N, Hopper R: Polyethylene Wear: The Anderson Clinic Experience. Paper presented at: 35th Annual Course Advances in Arthroplasty-Harvard Medical School, September 28 2005; Cambridge, Massachussetts.

  18. Hopper RH, Jr., Engh CA, Jr., Fowlkes LB, Engh CA: The pros and cons of polyethylene sterilization with gamma irradiation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (429): 54-62.

  19. Sychterz CJ, Orishimo KF, Engh CA: Sterilization and polyethylene wear: clinical studies to support laboratory data. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A(5): 1017-1022.

  20. Wright TM: Polyethylene in knee arthroplasty: what is the future? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 440: 141-148.

  21. Kelly NH, Rajadhyaksha AD, Wright TM, Maher SA, Westrich GH: High stress conditions do not increase wear of thin highly crosslinked UHMWPE. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468(2): 418-423.

  22. Brach Del Prever EM, Bistolfi A, Bracco P, Costa L: UHMWPE for arthroplasty: past or future? J Orthop Traumatol 2009; 10(1): 1-8.

  23. Oral E, Malhi AS, Wannomae KK, Muratoglu OK: Highly cross-linked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene with improved fatigue resistance for total joint arthroplasty: recipient of the 2006 Hap Paul Award. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23(7): 1037-1044.

  24. Harris WH. Highly cross-linked, electron-beam-irradiated, melted polyethylene: some pros. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (429): 63-67.

  25. Digas G: New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters. Acta Orthop Suppl 2005; 76(315): 3-82.

  26. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P: The swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A Suppl 2: 2-20.

  27. Harris WH: First generation highly crosslinked polyethylenes: Current status. Paper presented at: 35th Annual Course Advances in Arthroplasty: Harvard Medical School; Cambridge, Massachusetts 2005.

  28. Chiesa RMM, Giordano C, Siccardi F, Cigada A: Influence of heat treatment on structural, mechanical and wear properties of crosslinked UHMWPE. Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Biomechanics 2004; 2: 20-28.

  29. Archibeck MJ, Jacobs JJ, Roebuck KA, Glant TT: The basic science of periprosthetic osteolysis. Instr Course Lect 2001; 50: 185-195.

  30. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA: A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17(5): 649-661.

  31. Benson LC, DesJardins JD, LaBerge M. Effects of in vitro wear of machined and molded UHMWPE tibial inserts on TKR kinematics. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 58(5): 496-504.

  32. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428): 26-34.

  33. Fehring TK, Murphy JA, Hayes TD, Roberts DW, Pomeroy DL, Griffin WL: Factors influencing wear and osteolysis in press-fit condylar modular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428): 40-50.

  34. Kuster MS, Stachowiak GW: Factors affecting polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2002; 25(2 Suppl): s235-242.

  35. Iwase T, Warashina H, Yamauchi K, Sugiura S, Hasegawa Y: Early head penetration into cemented Hylamer Ogee socket. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18(7): 920-924.

  36. Kurtz SM, Hozack W, Marcolongo M, Turner J, Rimnac C, Edidin A. Degradation of mechanical properties of UHMWPE acetabular liners following long-term implantation. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18(7 Suppl 1): 68-78.

  37. Kurtz SM, Rimnac CM, Hozack WJ, et al: In vivo degradation of polyethylene liners after gamma sterilization in air. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87(4): 815-823.

  38. Sychterz CJ, Young AM, Orishimo K, Engh CA: The relationship between shelf life and in vivo wear for polyethylene acetabular liners. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(2): 168-173.

  39. Shibata N, Tomita N: The anti-oxidative properties of alpha-tocopherol in gamma-irradiated UHMWPE with respect to fatigue and oxidation resistance. Biomaterials 2005; 26(29): 5755-5762.

  40. Oral E, Greenbaum ES, Malhi AS, Harris WH, Muratoglu OK: Characterization of irradiated blends of alpha-tocopherol and UHMWPE. Biomaterials 2005; 26(33): 6657-6663.

  41. Oral E, Wannomae KK, Hawkins N, Harris WH, Muratoglu OK: Alpha-tocopherol-doped irradiated UHMWPE for high fatigue resistance and low wear. Biomaterials 2004; 25(24): 5515-5522.

  42. Oral E, Muratoglu OK: UHMWPE Biomaterials Handbook: Chapter 15 Highly Crosslinked UHMWPE Doped with Vitamin E. 2nd ed: Academic Press Inc.; 2009.

  43. Shen FW, McKellop H: Surface-gradient cross-linked polyethylene acetabular cups: oxidation resistance and wear against smooth and rough femoral balls. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (430): 80-88.

  44. Rohrl S, Nivbrant B, Mingguo L, Hewitt B: In vivo wear and migration of highly cross-linked polyethylene cups a radiostereometry analysis study. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(4): 409-413.

  45. Ries MD: Highly cross-linked polyethylene: the debate is over-in opposition. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(4 Suppl 2): 59-62.

  46. Krushell RJ, Fingeroth RJ, Cushing MC: Early femoral head penetration of a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner vs a conventional polyethylene liner a case-controlled study. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (6 Suppl 3): 73-76.

  47. Estok DM, 2nd, Bragdon CR, Plank GR, Huang A, Muratoglu OK, Harris WH: The measurement of creep in ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene: a comparison of conventional versus highly cross-linked polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(2): 239-243.

  48. Dorr LD, Wan Z, Shahrdar C, Sirianni L, Boutary M, Yun A: Clinical performance of a Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liner for total hip arthroplasty at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87(8): 1816-1821.

  49. Bradford L, Baker DA, Graham J, Chawan A, Ries MD, Pruitt LA: Wear and surface cracking in early retrieved highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A(6): 1271-1282.

  50. Bradford L, Kurland R, Sankaran M, Kim H, Pruitt LA, Ries MD: Early failure due to osteolysis associated with contemporary highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A(5): 1051-1056.

  51. Huddleston JI, Harris AH, Atienza CA, Woolson ST: Hylamer vs conventional polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty: a long-term case-control study of wear rates and osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25(2): 203-207.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com