González-Vergara C, Ramírez-Arias JL

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 26
Paginas: 181-188
Archivo PDF: 635.93 Kb.

RESUMEN

El objetivo primordial de este artículo es reforzar la práctica de la mastografía como el estándar de oro para la detección y el diagnóstico oportuno del cáncer de mama, analizando los principales hallazgos de sospecha y su clasificación, así como las indicaciones de la amplia gama de estudios de imagen con los que actualmente se cuenta para el complemento diagnóstico.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Gold RH, Bassett LW, Widoff BE. Highlights from the history of mammography. Radiographics 1990; 10; 1111-1131.

2. Warren SL. Roentgenologic study of the breast. AJR 1930; 21:113-124.

3. Gerson-Cohen J, Strickler A. Roentgenologic examination of the normal breast: its evaluation in demonstrating early neoplastic changes. AJR 1938; 40: 189-201.

4. Egan R. Mammography. Chicago: Thomas; 1964; 3-16.

5. Leborgne R. Diagnosis of tumors of the breast by simple roentgenography. AJR 1951; 65:1-11.

6. Leborgne R. The breast in roentgen diagnosis. Montevideo, Uruguay: Impresora; 1953.

7. Sickles EA. Breast imaging: from 1965 to the present. Radiology 2000; 215: 1-16.

8. Liberman L. Us-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost effectiveness. Radiology 1998; 208: 717-723.

9. World Health Organization. Cancer. Breast cancer: prevention and control [Monografía en internet]. Available in: http://www.who.int/cancer/detection/breastcancer/en/index3.html

10. Cárdenas SJ, Erazo VA, Maafs ME, Poitevin CA (coordinadores). Consenso Nacional sobre el Diagnóstico y Tratamiento del Cáncer Mamario. Cuarta Revisión. México: Masson Doyma; 2011. Disponible en: http://www.fucam.org.mx/descargas/consenso-nacional.pdf

11. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-041-SSA2-2011. Para la prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento de cáncer de mama. Disponible en: http://www.dof.gob.mx/documentos/4409/salud/salud.htm

12. Jørgensen KJ, Keen JD, Gøtzsche PC. Is mammographic screening justifiable considering its substantial overdiagnosis rate and minor effect on mortality? Radiology 2011; 260: 621-627

13. Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH, Yen AM, Cohen A, Tot T et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 2011; 260: 658-663.

14. Kopans DB, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Mammographic screening and “overdiagnosis”. Radiology 2011; 260: 616-620.

15. American College of Radiology (eds). Mammography Quality Control Manual. Virginia: American College of Radiology; 1999.

16. Jackson VP. Diagnostic mammography. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 42: 853-870.

17. Park JM, Franken EA Jr, Garg M, Fajardo LL, Niklason LT. Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. Radiographics 2007; 27: S231-S240.

18. Kontos D, Ikejimba LC, Bakic PR, Troxel AB, Conant EF, Maidment AD. Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment. Radiology 2011; 261: 80-91.

19. D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS—breast imaging atlas. 4a ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology; 2003. Available in: http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/BIRADS/Mammography; http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/BIRADS/Ultrasound

20. Fine RE, Staren ED. Updates in breast ultrasound. Surg Clin North Am 2004; 84: 1001-1084.

21. Yeung DK, Yang WT, Tse GM. Breast cancer: in vivo proton MR spectroscopy in the characterization of histopathologic subtypes and preliminary observations in axillary node metastases. Radiology 2002; 225: 190-197.

22. Hata T, Takahashi H, Watanabe K, Takahashi M, Taguchi K, Itoh T, Todo S. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 198: 190-197.

23. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001; 220: 13-30.

24. Lim HS, Yoon W, Chung TW, Kim JK, Park JG, Kang HK et al. FDG PET/CT for the detection and evaluation of breast diseases: usefulness and limitations. Radiographics 2007; 27 (Suppl 1): S197-213.

25. Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, Tartar M, Pisano ED, Larsen LH et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology 2011; 258: 59-72.

26. Ferris-James Diana et al. Imaging approaches to diagnosis and management of common ductal abnormalities. Radiographics 2012; 32: 1009-1030.