medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Digital)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Impreso)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2013, Número 3

<< Anterior

Acta Ortop Mex 2013; 27 (3)


Artroplastía total de rodilla navegada. ¿Por qué utilizarla?

Ochoa-Cázares R, Cuadra-Castillo M

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 46
Paginas: 205-210
Archivo PDF: 278.42 Kb.


RESUMEN

La artroplastía total de rodilla es un procedimiento cada día más común, que ofrece alivio seguro y efectivo para el dolor y restauración de función en pacientes afectados por artritis y osteoartrosis. El éxito del procedimiento es multifactorial, siendo la alineación del implante uno de los factores que más influye en un resultado satisfactorio y confiable. La artroplastía total de rodilla navegada fue diseñada con el objetivo de ayudar al cirujano a mejorar el alineamiento y la posición de los implantes, mientras él mantiene el control de ejecución de cortes y fijación. Revisamos en este artículo los orígenes de la navegación, los detalles técnicos, ventajas y desventajas, incluyendo un vistazo a los futuros usos, y el porqué se considera que su implementación en la cirugía de reemplazo de rodilla juega un rol de suma importancia con múltiples aplicaciones y una reproducibilidad que lo hace un procedimiento cada día más común, seguro y exitoso.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK: Meta-analysis of navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(6): 1177-82.

  2. Saragaglia D: Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: 12 years’ experience in Grenoble. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2009; 193(1): 91-104; discussion 104-5.

  3. Bae DK, Song SJ: Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011; 3(4): 259-67.

  4. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S: Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 457: 156-62.

  5. Catani F, Biasca N, Ensini A, Leardini A, Bianchi L, Digennaro V: Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(4): 765-71.

  6. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C: A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2): 236-43.

  7. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP: Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(3): 282-8.

  8. Tolk JJ, Koot HW, Janssen RP: Computer navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2012; 25(4): 347-52.

  9. Mombert M, Van Den Daelen L, Gunst P, Missinne L: Navigated total knee arthroplasty: a radiological analysis of 42 randomized cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007; 73(1): 49-54.

  10. Fu Y, Wang M, Liu Y, Fu Q: Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(6): 1075-82.

  11. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN: Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplast. 2005; 20: 618-26.

  12. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M: Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86: 682-7.

  13. Zamora LA, Humphreys KJ, Watt AM, Forel D, Cameron AL: Systematic review of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg. 2013; 83(1-2): 22-30.

  14. Bohling U, Schamberger H, Grittner U: Computerized and technical navigation in total knee-arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol. 2005; 5: 69-75.

  15. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P: Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop. 2003; 27: 366-9.

  16. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W: Computer assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomized, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86: 372-7.

  17. Jenny JY, Boeri C: Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg. 2001; 6: 217-20.

  18. Kim TK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Chung BJ, Cho HJ, Seong SC: Execution accuracy of bone resection and implant fixation in computer assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2010; 17(1): 23-8.

  19. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K: Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(8): 1097-106.

  20. Bertsch C, Holz U, Konrad G, Vakili A, Oberst M: Early clinical outcome after navigated total knee arthroplasty. Comparison with conventional implantation in TKA: a controlled and prospective analysis. Article in German. Orthopade. 2007; 36(8): 739-45.

  21. Oberst M, Bertsch C, Wurstlin S, Holz U: CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. navigated knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a controlled, prospective, and randomized study. Unfallchirurg. 2003; 106: 941-8.

  22. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C: Computer assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001; 87: 18-28.

  23. Sparmann J, Wolke B, Czupalla H: Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85: 830-5.

  24. Stulberg SD, Picard F, Saragaglia D: Computer-assisted total knee replacement arthroplasty. Oper Tech Orthop. 2003; 10: 25-39.

  25. Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C: Computer assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90: 1039.

  26. Victor J, Hoste D: Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 428: 131-9.

  27. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA: Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73: 709.

  28. Cheng T, Pan XY, Mao X, Zhang GY, Zhang XL: Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up. Knee. 2012; 19(4): 237-45.

  29. Bonutti PM, Dethmers DA, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, Mont MA: Navigation did not improve the precision of minimally invasive knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(11): 2730-5.

  30. Khan M, et al: Assessing short-term functional outcomes and knee alignment of computer-assisted navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 27: 271.

  31. Choong P, Dowsey M, Stoney J: Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24: 560.

  32. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, Stengel D: Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2): 261-9.

  33. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, Kwon OR: Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 14-9.

  34. Schüttrumpf JP, Balcarek P, Sehmisch S, Frosch S, Wachowski MM, Stürmer KM: Navigated cementless total knee arthroplasty - medium-term clinical and radiological results. Open Orthop J. 2012; 6: 160-3.

  35. König DP, Michael JW, Eysel P, Münnich U, Lichtenstein T, Schnurr C: Computer-assisted joint replacement surgery. Financial and clinical impact for a specialized orthopaedic hospital. Z Orthop Unfall. 2009; 147(6): 669-74.

  36. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Leitner F: An 8- to 10-year follow-up of 26 computer-assisted total knee arthroplasties. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(10 Suppl): S121-3.

  37. Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, et al: Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19(7): 1107-12.

  38. Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Spriggins AJ: Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(11): 1480-2.

  39. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R: Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(4): 570-8.

  40. Peterlein CD, Schofer MD, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Scherf FG: Clinical outcome and quality of life after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, single-surgeon study and review of the literature. Chir Organi Mov. 2009; 93(3): 115-22.

  41. Ballas R, Philippot R, Cartier JL, Boyer B, Farizon F: Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: impact of the surgeon’s experience on the component placement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 133(3): 397-403.

  42. Love GJ, Kinninmonth AW: Training benefits of computer navigated total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2013; 20(4): 236-41.

  43. Hart R, Janecek M, Cizmár I, Stipcák V, Kucera B, Filan P: Minimally invasive and navigated implantation for total knee arthroplasty: X-ray analysis and early clinical results. [Article in German] Orthopade. 2006; 35(5): 552-7.

  44. Tria AJ Jr. The evolving role of navigation in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2006; 35(7 Suppl): 18-22.

  45. Biasca N, Schneider TO, Bungartz M: Minimally invasive computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009; 40(4): 537-63.

  46. Biasca N, Wirth S, Bungartz M: Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA). Knee. 2009; 16(1): 22-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com