Vela-Amieva M, Espino-Vela J

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 15
Paginas: 237-240
Archivo PDF: 624.21 Kb.

RESUMEN

Existen evidencias sólidas que demuestran la utilidad de realizar de manera sistemática una prueba de saturación de oxígeno a todos los recién nacidos aparentemente sanos después de 24 horas de nacido y antes de 48 horas; a esta prueba se le ha llamado “tamiz neonatal para cardiopatías congénitas complejas” y sirve para detectar oportunamente anomalías cardiacas estructurales congénitas que cursan con hipoxemia. Las cardiopatías complejas con pronóstico grave que pueden detectarse por este método son: síndrome de corazón izquierdo hipoplásico, atresia congénita de la válvula pulmonar, tronco arterioso, conexión anómala total de las venas pulmonares, transposición completa de las grandes arterias, tetralogía de Fallot y atresia de la válvula tricúspide. Esta prueba se ha incorporado al conjunto obligatorio de pruebas para el tamiz neonatal en muchos países y su generalización a todo el mundo, parece inminente.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. CDC. Ten great public health achievements. United Statres 2001-2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2011;60:619-23.

2. Guthrie R, Susi A. A simple phenyalanine method for detecting phenylketonuria in large populations of newborn infants. Pediatrics. 1963;32:338-43.

3. Wilcken B, Wiley V, Hammond J, Carpenter K. Screening newborns for inborn error of metabolism by tandem mass spectrometry. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2304-12.

4. Bennett MJ, Rinaldo P, Wilcken B, Pass KA, Watson MS, Wanders RJ. Newborn screening for metabolic disorders: how are we doing, and where are we going? Clin Chem. 2012;58:324-31.

5. Watson AS, Mann MY, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Rinaldo P, Howell RR. Newborn swcreening: toward a uniform panel and system. Exexutive Summary. Genet Med. 2006;8:S1-11.

6. Marino BS, Lipkin PH, Newburger JW, Peacock G, Gerdes M, Gaynor JW, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease: evaluation and management: a scientific statement from the America Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126:1143-72.

7. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1890-900.

8. Mahle WT, Newburger JW, Matherne GP, Smith FC, Hoke TR, Koppel R, et al. Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2009;120:447-58.

9. Kemper AR, Mahle WT, Martin GR, Cooley WC, Kumar P, Morrow R, et al. Strategies for implementing screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics. 2011;128:1259-67.

10. Riede FT, Wörner C, Dähnert I, Möckel A, Kostelka M, Schneider P. Effectiveness of neonatal pulse oximetry screening for detection of critical congenital heart disease in daily clinical routine: results form a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:975-81.

11. Thangaratinam S, Brown K, Zamora J, Khan KS, Ewer AK. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in asymptomatic newborn babies: a systematic review and metanalysis. Lancet. 2012;379:2459-64.

12. De-Wahl Granelli A, Wennergren M, Sandberg K, Mellander M, Bejlum C, Inganäs L, et al. Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39,821 newborns. BMJ. 2009;338:a3037.

13. Frank LH, Bradshaw E, Beekiman R, Mahle WT, Martin GR. Critical congenital heart disease screeni9ng using pulse oximetry. J Pediatr. 2013;162:445-53.

14. Ewer AK, Middleton LJ, Furmston AT, Bhoyar A, Daniels JP, Thangaratinam S, et al. Pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart defects in newborn infants (PulseOx): a test accuracy study. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):785-94.

15. Ewer AK, Furmton AT, Middleton LJ, Deeks JJ, Daniels JP, Pattison HM, et al. Pulse oximetry as a screening test for congenital heart defects in newborn infants: a test accuracy study with evaluation of acceptability and cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16:v-xiii1-184.