medigraphic.com
ISSN 0185-3325 (Impreso)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz

2014, Número 6

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Salud Mental 2014; 37 (6)


Confiabilidad interevaluador del K-SADS-PL-2009/trastornos del espectro autista (TEA)

Zavaleta-Ramírez P, Náfate-López O, Villarreal-Valdés G, Ulloa-Flores RE, Albores-Gallo L

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 37
Paginas: 461-466
Archivo PDF: 268.71 Kb.


RESUMEN

El incremento en la prevalencia de los trastornos del espectro autista (TEA) provocó que dejaran de considerarse como poco frecuentes. La Entrevista Diagnóstica de Autismo Revisada (ADI-R; Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised) y la Cédula de Observación General para el Diagnóstico del Autismo (ADOS-G, ) se consideran estándares de oro para diagnósticar TEA. Sin embargo, ninguno de estos instrumentos evalúa la comorbilidad asociada. La nueva versión de la Entrevista de Diagnóstico Psiquiátrico para Niños y Adolescentes, K-SADS-PL-2009, agregó un apartado para el diagnóstico de los TEA.
Objetivo. El propósito de este estudio fue traducir, adaptar y analizar la confiabilidad interevaluadora del K-SADS-PL-2009/TEA.
Método. La muestra se conformó por 40 niños y adolescentes, de ambos sexos, con un rango de edad de cuatro a 17 años, con un diagnóstico presuntivo de trastorno del espectro autista. La versión original del K-SADS-PL-2009/TEA fue traducida al español por dos de los autores y retraducida al inglés por un traductor certificado ciego al estudio.
Resultados. Confiabilidad interevaluador. Los coeficientes de correlación intraclase fueron de buenos a excelentes para los siguientes diagnósticos en el presente y pasado: autismo 0.79 y 0.74; trastorno de Asperger 0.85 y 1.0; trastorno generalizado del desarrollo no especificado (TGDNE) 0.72 y 0.41. Los coeficientes kappa para las evaluaciones realizadas por los expertos fueron de buenos a excelentes para los siguientes diagnósticos en el presente y en el pasado: autismo 0.89 y 0.87; Asperger 0.77 y 1.00; TGDNE 0.69 y 0.64. La concordancia entre el diagnóstico realizado en el servicio de urgencias y el corroborado posteriormente por medio del instrumento diagnóstico fue de 37.5%, con un índice de error diagnóstico de 67.5%.
Conclusiones. El K-SADS-PL-2009/TEA mostró una buena confiabilidad interevaluador y puede usarse en niños y adolescentes mexicanos para propósitos clínicos y de investigación.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Dawson G. Early behavioral intervention, brain plasticity, and the prevention of autism spectrum disorder. Dev Psychopathol 2008;20:775– 803.

  2. Albores-Gallo L, Hernández-Guzmán L, Díaz-Pichardo JA, Cortes- Hernández B. Dificultades en la evaluación y diagnóstico del autismo: Una discusión. Salud Mental 2008;31:37–44.

  3. Albores-Gallo L, Roldán-Ceballos O, Villarreal-Valdés G, Betanzos- Cruz BX et al. M-CHAT Mexican version validity and reliability and some cultural considerations. ISRN Neurol 2012:408694.

  4. Living-Varela K. Confiabilidad y validez del inventario de comportamiento autista (ABC) en niños con trastornos del espectro autista. 2012. Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/hpicomisioninvestigacion/ psiquiatria-infantil-y-de-la-adolescencia.

  5. Robins DL. Screening for autism spectrum disorders in primary care settings. Autism Int J Res Pract 2008;12:537–556.

  6. Inada N, Koyama T, Inokuchi E, Kuroda M et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Modified Checklist for autism in toddlers (M-CHAT). Res Autism Spectr Disord 2011;5:330–336.

  7. Wong V, Hui L-HS, Lee W-C, Leung L-SJ et al. A modified screening tool for autism (Checklist for Autism in Toddlers [CHAT-23]) for Chinese children. Pediatrics 2004;114:e166–176.

  8. Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, Cook Jr EH et al. The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J Autism Dev Disord 2000;30:205–223.

  9. Lord C, Rutter M, Couteur A Le. Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 1994;24:659–685.

  10. Angold A, Costello EJ. The Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment (CAPA). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000;39:39–48.

  11. Egger HL, Erkanli A, Keeler G, Potts E et al. Test-Retest Reliability of the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;45:538–549.

  12. Gjevik E, Eldevik S, Fjæran-Granum T, Sponheim E. Kiddie-SADS reveals high rates of DSM-IV disorders in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2010;41:761–769.

  13. Ivarsson T, Melin K. Autism spectrum traits in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). J Anxiety Disord 2008;22:969–978.

  14. Sinzig J, Walter D, Doepfner M. Attention Deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: Symptom or syndrome? J Atten Disord 2009;13:117–126.

  15. Lee DO, Ousley OY. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in a clinic sample of children and adolescents with pervasive developmental disorders. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2006;16:737–746.

  16. Leyfer OT, Folstein SE, Bacalman S, Davis NO et al. Comorbid psychiatric disorders in children with autism: interview development and rates of disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2006;36:849–861.

  17. Ulloa RE, Ortiz S, Higuera F, Nogales I et al. [Interrater reliability of the Spanish version of schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (KSADS- PL)]. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2006;34:36–40.

  18. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U et al. Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36:980–988. Zavaleta-Ramírez et al. 466 Vol. 37, No. 6, noviembre-diciembre 2014

  19. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC.: 2000.

  20. Birmaher B, Ehmann M, Axelson DA, Goldstein BI et al. Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children (KSADS- PL) for the assessment of preschool children-a preliminary psychometric study. J Psychiatr Res 2009;43:680–686.

  21. Rescorla L, Alley A. Validation of the language development survey (LDS): a parent report tool for identifying language delay in toddlers. J Speech Lang Hear Res JSLHR 2001;44:434–445.

  22. Cox A, Klein K, Charman T, Baird G et al. Autism spectrum disorders at 20 and 42 months of age: stability of clinical and ADI-R diagnosis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1999;40:719–732.

  23. Gilchrist A, Green J, Cox A, Burton D et al. Development and current functioning in adolescents with Asperger syndrome: a comparative study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001;42:227–240.

  24. Lord C, Rutter M, Couteur A Le. Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 1994;24:659–685.

  25. Gilchrist A, Green J, Cox A, Burton D et al. Development and current functioning in adolescents with Asperger syndrome: a comparative study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001;42:227–240.

  26. Cicchetti DV, Lord C, Koenig K, Klin A et al. Reliability of the ADIR: multiple examiners evaluate a single case. J Autism Dev Disord 2008;38:764–770.

  27. American Psychiatric Association AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Quinta edición. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

  28. Szatmari P, Bryson SE, Boyle MH, Streiner DL et al. Predictors of outcome among high functioning children with autism and Asperger syndrome. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2003;44:520–528.

  29. Szatmari P, Bryson S, Duku E, Vaccarella L et al. Similar developmental trajectories in autism and Asperger syndrome: from early child-hood to adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009;50:1459–1467.

  30. Reaven JA, Hepburn SL, Ross RG. Use of the ADOS and ADI-R in children with psychosis: importance of clinical judgment. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008;13:81–94.

  31. Jeans LM, Santos RM, Laxman DJ, McBride BA et al. Early predictors of ASD in young children using a nationally representative data set. J Early Interv 2014. Available at: http://jei.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/ 1053815114523319. Última visita el 12 de agosto, 2014.

  32. Herlihy L, Knoch K, Vibert B, Fein D. Parents’ first concerns about toddlers with autism spectrum disorder: Effect of sibling status. Autism Int J Res Pract 2013.

  33. Kozlowski AM, Matson JL, Horovitz M, Worley JA et al. Parents’ first concerns of their child’s development in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. Dev Neurorehabilitation 2011;14:72–78.

  34. Mazefsky CA, Kao J, Oswald DP. Preliminary evidence suggesting caution in the use of psychiatric self-report measures with adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord 2011;5:164–174.

  35. Emerson E, Brigham P. The developmental health of children of parents with intellectual disabilities: cross sectional study. Res Dev Disabil 2014;35:917–921.

  36. Bildt A de, Sytema S, Ketelaars C, Kraijer D et al. Interrelationship between Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic (ADOSG), Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R), and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) classification in children and adolescents with mental retardation. J Autism Dev Disord 2004;34:129–137.

  37. Bölte S, Poustka F. [Diagnostic Observation Scale for Autistic Disorders: initial results of reliability and validity]. Z Für Kinder- Jugendpsychiatrie Psychother 2004;32:45–50.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com