medigraphic.com
ENGLISH

Revista Mexicana de Periodontología

ISSN 2007-4360 (Impreso)
Asociación Mexicana de Periodontología, Colegio de Periodoncistas A.C
  • Mostrar índice
  • Números disponibles
  • Información
    • Información general        
    • Directorio
  • Publicar
    • Instrucciones para autores        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Inicio
    • Índice de revistas            
    • Registro / Acceso
  • Mi perfil

2014, Número 3

<< Anterior

Rev Mex Periodontol 2014; 5 (3)


Microcirugía periodontal

Gutiérrez CRM, Mariaud SRP, Martínez RV
Texto completo Cómo citar este artículo Artículos similares

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 30
Paginas: 119-123
Archivo PDF: 170.24 Kb.


PALABRAS CLAVE

Microcirugía, recesiones gingivales, regeneración de defectos intraóseos, material de microcirugía.

RESUMEN

La microcirugía se define como el refinamiento de las técnicas quirúrgicas. Su comienzo data de 1886, con el microscopio de Zehender-Westein; sin embargo, no fue sino hasta la década de los 90 que se incrementó el refinamiento quirúrgico en el campo de la periodoncia debido a la magnificación visual. Este artículo es una revisión bibliográfica que se enfoca en los avances de la cirugía periodontal, debido a que en la última década todos los conocimientos convergen en un abordaje microquirúrgico.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Shanelec DA, Tibbetts LS. A perspective on the future of periodontal microsurgery. Periodontol. 1996; 11: 58-64.

  2. Cohen-Edward S. Atlas de cirugía periodontal cosmética y reconstructiva. Cap. 29. 3a ed. Caracas: AMOLCA; 2010: pp. 433-439.

  3. Belcher JM. A perspective on periodontal microsurgery. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001; 21: 191-1966.

  4. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. A minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative in the regenerative treatment of intra-bony defects: a novel approach to limit morbidity. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34: 87-93.

  5. Burkhardt R, Lang NP. Coverage of localized gingival recessions: comparison of micro-and macrosurgical techniques. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 287-293.

  6. Lee HS. Principios de suturas en odontología. Cap. 1, 2. 2003: pp. 10-25.

  7. Leknes KN, Selvig KA, Bøe OE, Wikesjo UM. Tissue reactions to sutures in the presence and absence of anti-infective therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 130-138.

  8. Parirokh M, Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Stowe S, Kakoei S. A scanning electron microscope study of plaque accumulation on silk and PVDF suture materials in oral mucosa. International Endodontic Journal. 2004; 37: 776-781.

  9. Andrade PF, Grisi MF, Marcaccini AM, et al. Comparison between micro- and macrosurgical techniques for the treatment of localized gingival recessions using coronally positioned flaps and enamel matrix derivative. J Periodontol. 2010; 81: 1572-1579.

  10. Castellanos A, de la Rosa M, de la Garza M, Caffesse RG. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions. J Periodontol. 2006; 77: 7-14.

  11. Cueva MA, Boltchi FE, Hallmon WW, Nunn ME, Rivera-Hidalgo F, Rees T. A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 949-956.

  12. Spahr A, Haegewald S, Tsoulfidou F et al. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report. J Periodontol. 2005; 76: 1871-1880.

  13. Pilloni A, Paolantonio M, Camargo PM. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation. J Periodontol. 2006; 77: 2031-2039.

  14. Cheng YF, Chen JW, Lin SJ, Lu HK. Is coronally positioned flap procedure adjunct with enamel matrix derivative or root conditioning a relevant predictor for achieving root coverage? A systemic review. J Periodontal Res. 2007; 42: 474-485.

  15. Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap procedures: A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35 (Suppl. 8): 136-162.

  16. Miller PD Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985; 5 (2): 8-13.

  17. Francetti L, Del Fabbro M, Testori S, Weinstein RL. Microsurgical treatment of gingival recession: a controlled clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 25: 181-188.

  18. Cortellini P, Pini-Prato G, Tonetti MS. The modified papilla preservation technique. A new surgical approach for interproximal regenerative procedures. Journal of Periodontology. 1995; 66: 261-266.

  19. Cortellini P, Pini-Prato G, Tonetti MS. The simplified papilla preservation flap. A novel surgical approach for the management of soft tissues in regenerative procedures. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 1999; 19: 589-599.

  20. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS, Lang NP, Suvan JE, Zucchelli G, Vangsted T et al. The simplified papilla preservation flap in the regenerative treatment of deep intrabony defects: clinical outcomes and postoperative morbidity. Journal of Periodontology. 2001; 72: 1702–1712.

  21. Harrel SK, Wilson TG, Nunn ME. Prospective assessment of the use of enamel matrix proteins with minimally invasive surgery. J Periodontol. 2005; 76: 380-384.

  22. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Minimally invasive surgical technique and enamel matrix derivative in intra-bony defects. I: clinical outcomes and morbidity. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34: 1082-1088.

  23. Cortellini P, Nieri M, Prato GP, Tonetti MS. Single minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative to treat multiple adjacent intra-bony defects: clinical outcomes and patient morbidity. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35: 605-613.

  24. Ribeiro FV, Nociti-Junior FH, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Casati MZ. Use of enamel matrix protein derivative with minimally invasive surgical approach in intrabony periodontal defects: clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Braz Dent J. 2010; 21: 60-67.

  25. Harrel SK, Wilson TG Jr., Nunn ME. Prospective assessment of the use of enamel matrix derivative with minimally invasive surgery: 6-year results. J Periodontol. 2010; 81: 435-441.

  26. Cortellini P, Pini-Prato G, Tonetti M. Periodontal regeneration of human infrabony defect with titanium reinforced membranes. A controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 1995; 66: 797-803.

  27. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Microsurgical approach to periodontal regeneration. Initial evaluation in a case cohort. Journal of Periodontology. 2001; 72: 559-569.

  28. Wachtel H, Schenk G, Böhm S, Weng D, Zuhr O, Hürzeler MB. Microsurgical access flap and enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 30: 496-504.

  29. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Improved wound stability with a modified minimally invasive surgical technique in the regenerative treatment of isolated interdental intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36: 157-163.

  30. Ribeiro FV, Casarin R, Palma M, Júnior F, Sallum E, Casati M. Clinical and patient-centered outcomes after minimally invasive non-surgical or surgical approaches for the treatment of intrabony defects: a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2011; 82: 1256-1266.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Periodontol. 2014;5

ARTíCULOS SIMILARES

CARGANDO ...