medigraphic.com
ENGLISH

Archivos de Neurociencias

Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía
  • Mostrar índice
  • Números disponibles
  • Información
    • Información general        
    • Directorio
  • Publicar
    • Instrucciones para autores        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Inicio
    • Índice de revistas            
    • Registro / Acceso
  • Mi perfil

2014, Número 3

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Arch Neurocien 2014; 19 (3)


Enfermedad carotidea aterosclerótica. Experiencia en el Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía en pacientes sometidos a angioplastía carotídea con stent

Santana-López JM, Zenteno-Castellanos MA, Balderrama BJ, Escobar-Pérez L, Vega-Montesinos S
Texto completo Cómo citar este artículo Artículos similares

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 35
Paginas: 136-146
Archivo PDF: 1060.08 Kb.


PALABRAS CLAVE

enfermedad carotidea ateroesclerótica, angioplastía, stent, isquemia cerebral.

RESUMEN

La enfermedad carotidea aterosclerosa (EC) es una entidad frecuente a nivel mundial, con una prevalencia aproximada entre el 55 y 60%, siendo más frecuente en pacientes mayores de 60 años, sin diferencias significativas entre género. La EC moderada-severa (estenosis › 50%) explica alrededor del 15% de los casos de infarto cerebral y hasta el 50% de los episodios isquémicos transitorios. Asimismo, se identifica por soplos carotídeos en personas asintomáticas (sin haber presentado síntomas de isquemia cerebral). El tratamiento consistente en antiagregantes plaquetarios, uso de estatinas y control de factores de riesgo; pero en ocasiones es necesario el tratamiento invasivo (endarterectomía vs colocación de endoprótesis). La angioplastía carotidea puede ser superior a la endarterectomía carotidea en cierto grupo de pacientes, como en aquellos sometidos previamente a cirugía o radiación de cuello.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Fisher CM. Occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1951;65:346-77.

  2. Conrado J. Miller Fisher and the histor y of carotid arter y disease. Stroke 1996;27(3):559-66.

  3. Fields WS. The history of carotid endar terectomy. Rev Neurol Argent 1991;16:20-8.

  4. Young Victoria, Gillard Jonathan H. Carotid-artery imaging in the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of stroke. Lancet Neurol 2009;8, (6):569-80.

  5. Baquis GD, Pessin MS, Scott MR. Limb shaking-a carotid TIA. Stroke 1985;16:444-8.

  6. Cantú Brito C. Estenosis carotidea. ¿Cómo decidir endarterectomía vs colocación de stent, vs sólo tratamiento médico? Rev Investigación Clín 2009; 61:(1):53-65.

  7. Rodríguez Saldaña J, Cantú Brito C, Sosa Espinosa P. Prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis in a cohort of Mexico City. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1998;68(1):44-50.

  8. Escobedo J, Schargrodsky H, Champagne B. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Latin America and its association with sub-clinical carotid atherosclerosis: the CARMELA cross sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2009;26;(8):52.

  9. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endar terectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of endarterectomy in carotid symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445-53.

  10. Final results of the Nor th American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). Stroke 1998;29:286.

  11. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endar terectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of endarterectomy in carotid symptomatic patients with moderade or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998;339: 1415-25.

  12. European Carotid Surger y Triallists’. Collaborative Group. Randomiced Trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surger y Trial. Lancet 1998;351:1379-87.

  13. European Carotid Surger y Triallists’. MRC Carotid Surger y Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337: 1235-43.

  14. The European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. Endarterectomy for moderate symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 1996;347:1591-93.

  15. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endar terectomy for asymptomatic carotid ar ter y stenosis. JAMA 1995;273:1421-8.

  16. Rosenthal D, Rudderman R, Borrero E. Carotid endar terectomy to correct asymptomatic stenosis: ten years later. J Vasc Surg 1987;6:226:30.

  17. Stoner MC, Abbott VM, Wong DR. Defining the high risk patients for carotid endar terectomy: an analisys of the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement program database. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:285-95.

  18. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the carotid and ver tebral ar ter y transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS): a randomized trial. Lancet 2001;357:1729-37.

  19. Yadav JS. Study of angioplasty with protection in patients at high risk for endarterectomy (SAPHIRE) trial. Paper presented at:2002 Scientific Sessions of American Heart Association. Chicago IL. 2002.

  20. Hobson RW II.Update on the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stent trial (CREST) protocol. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194(Suppl 1):S9-S14.

  21. Brott TG, hobson RW II, Howard G. Crest investigators. Stening versus endar terectomy for treatment of carotid ar ter y stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010;363:11-23.

  22. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B. Endarterectomy vs stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1660-71.

  23. Eliasziw M, Rankin RN, Fox AJ. Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis. Nort Am Sympt Carotid Endarter Trial (NASCET) Group. Stroke 1995;26:1747-52.

  24. Grant Edward G, Benson Carol B, Moneta Gregory L. Carotid artery stenosis: gray- scale and Doppler US Diagnosis-Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference1. Radiol 2003;229(2):340-6.

  25. Huston J III James EM, Brown RD. Redefined duplex ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosis of carotid ar ter y stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:1133-40.

  26. Johnson MB, Wilkinson ID, Wattam J. Comparison of Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and catheter angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis. Clin Radiol 2000;55: 912-20.

  27. Berr y E, Kelly S, Westwood ME. The cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography for carotid artery stenosis and peripheral vascular disease: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2002; 6: 1-155.

  28. Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ. Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-ar terial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006; 367:1503-12.

  29. Lev MH, Romero JM, Goodman DNF. Total occlussion vs hairline residual lumen of the internal carotid ar teries: accuracy of single section helical CT angiography. AJNMR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1123-9.

  30. Someone A, Carriero A, Armillota M, et al. Spiral CT angiography in the study of carotid stenosis, J Neuroradiol 1997;24:18-22.

  31. Bar tlet ES, Walters TD, Symons SP. Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT Angiography. AJNR 2006; 27: 13-9.

  32. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radi 2003;227:522-8.

  33. Heran NS, Song JK, Namba K, Smith W, Niimi Y, Berenstein A. The utility of DyNACT in neuroendovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27 (2): 330-2

  34. Buhk JH, Groth M, Sehner S, Fiehler J, Schmidt NO, Grzyska U. Application of a novel metal artifact correction algorithm in flat-panel CT after coil embolization of brain aneurysms: intraindividual comparison. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;30.

  35. Tobias Stuffert, Stephan Kloska, Tobias Engelhorn. Optimized intravenous flat detector CT for non-invasive visualization of intracranial stents: first results. Eur Radiol 2011;21:411-18.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Arch Neurocien. 2014;19

ARTíCULOS SIMILARES

CARGANDO ...