Campos PA, Falb KL, Hernández S, Díaz-Olavarrieta C, Gupta J

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 15
Paginas: 102-105
Archivo PDF: 267.67 Kb.

RESUMEN

Objetivo.Documentar frecuencia y tipos de acoso en la calle (AC) y la asociación entre experiencias de AC y percepción de cohesión social (CS). Material y métodos. Análisis de encuesta a mujeres que solicitan servicios en clínicas de la Secretaría Salud del Gobierno de la Ciudad de México. Resultados. 62.8% reportó algún tipo de AC el mes previo a la encuesta; aquéllas con experiencias de AC reportaron índices significativamente menores de CS (b = -0.46; IC95%: -0.69, -0.22). Conclusiones. Reducir el AC puede tener implicaciones importantes para mejorar la percepción de CS y la seguridad de las mujeres en la Ciudad de México.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. UN Women. Safe Cities Global Initiative brief [online monograph]. New York: UN Women, 2014 [accessed February 25, 2015]. Available at http:// www.unwomen.org/~/media/headquarters/attachments/sections/library/ publications/2014/un%20women%20safe%20cities%20brief-us-web.pdf

2. Stop Street Harassment. Unsafe and harassed in public spaces: A national street harassment report [online monograph]. Reston, Virginia: Stop Street Harassment; 2014 [accessed February 25, 2015]. Available at: http://www.stopstreetharassment.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/2014- National-street harassment-Street-Harassment-Report.pdf

3. Stopstreetharassment.org [Internet site]. Reston Virginia, USA. Stop Street Harassment 2016 [accessed January 9, 2015]. Available in: http:// www.stopstreetharassment.org

4. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program final impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. HUD, 2011.

5. Kawachi I, Berkman L. Social cohesion, social capital, and health. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, eds. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000:174-90.

6. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. Socioeconomic determinants of health: Health and social cohesion: why care about income inequality? BMJ 1997;314(7086):1037. http://doi.org/c29mrb

7. Fone D, White J, Farewell D, Kelly M, John G, Lloyd K, et al. Effect of neighborhood deprivation and social cohesion on mental health inequality: a multilevel population-based longitudinal study. Psychol Med 2014;44(11):2449-2460. http://doi.org/brx9

8. Kim ES, Park N, Peterson C. Perceived neighborhood social cohesion and stroke. Soc Sci Med 2013;97:49-55. http://doi.org/brzb

9. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 1997;277(5328):918-924. http://doi.org/bg5rs9

10. VanderEnde KE, Yount KM, Dynes MM, Sibley LM. Community-level correlates of intimate partner violence against women globally: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2012;75(7):1143-1155. http://doi.org/brzc

11. Dunckel-Graglia A. Pink transportation’ in Mexico City: reclaiming urban space through collective action against gender-based violence. Gend Dev 2013;21(2):265-276. http://doi.org/brzd

12. Falb KL, Diaz C, Campos PA, Valades J, Cardenas R, Carino G, Gupta J. Evaluating a health care provider delivered intervention to reduce intimate partner violence and mitigate associated health risks: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in Mexico City. BMC Public Health 2014;14(1):772-782. http://doi.org/brzf

13. Hollaback. Street harassment survey. Hollaback Croatia. 2012 [consulted August 24, 2016]. Available from: http://www.ihollaback.org/ wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Hollaback-Croatia_Online-street-harassment- survey.pdf

14. Sapag JC, Aracena M, Villarroel L, Poblete F, Berrocal C, Hoyos R, et al. Social capital and self-rated health in urban low income neighborhoods in Chile. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62(9):790-792. http://doi. org/dsg9fh

15. Popkin SJ, Leventhal T, Weismann G. Girls in the ‘Hood: The Importance of Feeling Safe. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, 2008.