Entrar/Registro  
INICIO ENGLISH
 
Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología
   
MENÚ

Contenido por año, Vol. y Num.

Índice de este artículo

Información General

Instrucciones para Autores

Mensajes al Editor

Directorio






>Revistas >Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología >Año 2018, No. S1


Félix-Sifuentes DJ
Choque hipovolémico, un nuevo enfoque de manejo
Rev Mex Anest 2018; 41 (S1)

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 24
Paginas: 169-174
Archivo PDF: 180.63 Kb.


Texto completo




FRAGMENTO

El trauma sigue siendo la principal causa de muerte con hemorragia como la principal causa de mortalidad prevenible durante las primeras 24 horas después del trauma. La hipovolemia se define como el estado fisiológico de sangre reducida o, más específicamente, volumen plasmático reducido. El shock hipovolémico es la expresión clínica de insuficiencia circulatoria que resulta en una utilización inadecuada de oxígeno celular. Es importante el reconocimiento oportuno, para que la reanimación pueda comenzar lo antes posible y se disminuya el riesgo de posibles complicaciones asociadas al mismo.


Palabras clave: Sin palabras Clave


REFERENCIAS

  1. Wang J, Liang T, Louis L, Nicolaou S, McLaughlin PD. Hypovolemic shock complex in the trauma setting: a pictorial review. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2013;64:156-163.

  2. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:583.

  3. Mutschler M, Paffrath T, Wölfl C, Probst C, Nienaber U, Schipper IB, et al. The ATLS(®) classification of hypovolaemic shock: a well established teaching tool on the edge? Injury. 2014;45 Suppl 3:S35-S38.

  4. Olaussen A, Blackburn T, Mitra B, Fitzgerald M. Review article: shock index for prediction of critical bleeding post-trauma: a systematic review. Emerg Med Australas. 2014;26:223-228.

  5. Liu YC, Liu JH, Fang ZA, Shan GL, Xu J, Qi ZW, et al. Modified shock index and mortality rate of emergency patients. World J Emerg Med. 2012;3:114-117.

  6. Moranville MP, Mieure KD, Santayana EM. Evaluation and management of shock States: hypovolemic, distributive, and cardiogenic shock. J Pharm Pract. 2011;24:44-60.

  7. Hasanin A, Mukhtar A, Nassar H. Perfusion indices revisited. J Intensive Care. 2017;5:24.

  8. Maegele M, Schöchl H, Cohen MJ. An update on the coagulopathy of trauma. Shock. 2014; 41 Suppl 1: 21-25.

  9. Schlimp CJ, Schöchl H. The role of fibrinogen in trauma-induced coagulopathy. Hamostaseologie. 2014;34:29-39.

  10. Moore EE, Moore HB, Gonzalez E, Sauaia A, Banerjee A, Silliman CC. Rationale for the selective administration of tranexamic acid to inhibit fibrinolysis in the severely injured patient. Transfusion. 2016;56 Suppl 2:S110-S114.

  11. Pabinger I, Fries D, Schöchl H, Streif W, Toller W. Tranexamic acid for treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding and hyperfibrinolysis. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017;129:303-316.

  12. Wise R, Faurie M, Malbrain MLNG, Hodgson E. Strategies for intravenous fluid resuscitation in trauma patients. World J Surg. 2017;41:1170-1183.

  13. Kalkwarf KJ, Cotton BA. Resuscitation for hypovolemic shock. Surg Clin North Am. 2017;97:1307-1321.

  14. De Backer D, Fagnoul D. Intensive care ultrasound: VI. Fluid responsiveness and shock assessment. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:129-136.

  15. Perera P, Mailhot T, Riley D, Mandavia D. The RUSH exam: Rapid ultrasound in SHOCK in the evaluation of the critically III. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010;28:29-56, vii.

  16. Lichtenstein D. FALLS-protocol: lung ultrasound in hemodynamic assessment of shock. Heart Lung Vessel. 2013;5:142-147.

  17. Serpa Neto A, Veelo DP, Peireira VG, de Assunção MS, Manetta JA, Espósito DC, et al. Fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starches in patients with sepsis is associated with an increased incidence of acute kidney injury and use of renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Crit Care. 2014;29:185.e1-7.

  18. Perkins GD, Olasveengen TM, Maconochie I, Soar J, Wyllie J, Greif R, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation: 2017 update. Resuscitation. 2018;123:43-50.

  19. Duke MD, Guidry C, Guice J, Stuke L, Marr AB, Hunt JP, et al. Restrictive fluid resuscitation in combination with damage control resuscitation: time for adaptation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:674-678.

  20. Schreiber MA, Meier EN, Tisherman SA, Kerby JD, Newgard CD, Brasel K, et al. A controlled resuscitation strategy is feasible and safe in hypotensive trauma patients: results of a prospective randomized pilot trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:687-695; discussion 695-697.

  21. Jansen JO, Thomas R, Loudon MA, Brooks A. Damage control resuscitation for patients with major trauma. BMJ. 2009;338:b1778.

  22. Chatrath V, Khetarpal R, Ahuja J. Fluid management in patients with trauma: Restrictive versus liberal approach. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31:308-316.

  23. Hsu JM, Pham TN. Damage control in the injured patient. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2011;1:66-72.

  24. Riskin DJ, Tsai TC, Riskin L, Hernandez-Boussard T, Purtill M, Maggio PM, et al. Massive transfusion protocols: the role of aggressive resuscitation versus product ratio in mortality reduction. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:198-205.



>Revistas >Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología >Año2018, No. S1
 

· Indice de Publicaciones 
· ligas de Interes 






       
Derechos Resevados 2019