medigraphic.com
ENGLISH

Revista Mexicana de Periodontología

ISSN 2007-4360 (Impreso)
Asociación Mexicana de Periodontología, Colegio de Periodoncistas A.C
  • Mostrar índice
  • Números disponibles
  • Información
    • Información general        
    • Directorio
  • Publicar
    • Instrucciones para autores        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Inicio
    • Índice de revistas            
    • Registro / Acceso
  • Mi perfil

2019, Número 3

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Mex Periodontol 2019; 10 (3)


Colgajo de avance coronal y técnica de túnel usando matriz derivada del esmalte (EMD) en el tratamiento de recesiones gingivales múltiples: una revisión de la literatura

Peregrino HED, Guzmán CCA, Mendoza AG
Texto completo Cómo citar este artículo 10.35366/92125

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/92125
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/92125
Artículos similares

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 23
Paginas: 65-68
Archivo PDF: 220.91 Kb.


PALABRAS CLAVE

Colgajo de avance coronal + EMD, técnica de túnel + EMD, recesiones gingivales.

RESUMEN

La recesión de la encía o tejido marginal gingival es denotada con base al desplazamiento del tejido marginal gingival hacia apical de la unión cemento-esmalte, exponiendo la superficie radicular. La influencia de factores (técnica de cepillado abrasiva, cepillo dental extremadamente duro, biotipo gingival delgado y trauma de oclusión secundario) desencadenan la pérdida de dicho tejido marginal, problemas funcionales y estéticos. En tal sentido, existen diversas técnicas quirúrgicas evocadas al tratamiento de la migración apical del tejido blando; de esta manera, el colgajo de avance coronal y la técnica de túnel son altamente predictibles, ya que muestran resultados favorables en términos de cobertura radicular. Los diversos estudios muestran una alta tasa de éxito para ambas técnicas, existiendo ausencia de revisiones en la utilización del EMD en el tratamiento de la cobertura radicular.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;134 (2): 220-225.

  2. Chrysanthakopoulos N. Gingival recession: prevalence and risk indicators among young greek adults. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014; 6 (3): 243-249.

  3. Mythri S, Arunkumar SM, Hegde S, Rajesh SK, Munaz M, Ashwin D. Etiology and occurrence of gingival recession. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015; 19 (6): 671-675.

  4. Guttiganur N, Aspalli S, Sanikop MV, Desai A, Gaddale R, Devanoorkar A. Classification systems for gingival recession and suggestion of a new classification system. Indian J Dent Res. 2018; 29: 233-237.

  5. Heasman PA, Holliday R, Bryant A, Preshaw PM. Evidence for the occurrence of gingival recession and non-carious cervical lesions as a consequence of traumatic toothbrushing. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42 (Suppl. 16): S237-S255. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12330.

  6. Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41 (6): 593-603.

  7. Vincent-Bugnas S, Charbit Y, Lamure J, Mahler P, Dard MM. Modified tunnel technique combined with enamel matrix derivative: a minimally invasive treatment for single or multiple class I recession defects. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27 (3): 145-154.

  8. Miller P. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985; 4 (2): 8-13.

  9. Grupe H, Warren R. Repair of gingival defects by a sliding flap operation. Journal of Periodontology. 1956; 27: 92-95.

  10. Allen AL. Use of the supraperiosteal envelope in soft tissue grafting for root coverage. II. Rationale technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994; 14: 302-315.

  11. Allen EP, Cummings LC. The role of periodontal plastic surgery in esthetic dentistry. Tex Dent J. 2002; 119, 1008- 1015.

  12. Restrepo O. Coronally repositioned flap: report of four cases. J Periodontol. 1973; 44: 564-567.

  13. Miron RJ, Sculean A, Cochran DL, Froum S, Zucchelli G, Nemcovsky C et al. Twenty years of enamel matrix derivative: the past, the present and the future. J Clin Periodontol. 2016; 43 (8): 668-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12546.

  14. Potârnichie O, Solomon S, Păsărin L, Mârţu A, Niţescu DC, Mârţu S. Statistical study on the prevalence of gingival recession in young adults. International Journal of Medical Dentistry. 2013; 3 (3): 219-224.

  15. Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Stefanini M, Rasperini G, Valles C et al. The influence of tooth location on the outcomes of multiple adjacent gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap: a multicenter re-analysis study. J Periodontol. 2019; 90 (11): 1244-1251.

  16. Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41 (Suppl 15): S44-62.

  17. Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41: 593-603. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12254.

  18. Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 41: 582-592. doi: 10.1111/ jcpe.12178.

  19. Sculean A, Cosgarea R, Stähli A, Katsaros C, Arweiler NB, Miron RJ et al. Treatment of multiple adjacent maxillary Miller class I, II, and III gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel, enamel matrix derivative, and subepithelial connective tissue graft: a report of 12 cases. Quintessence Int. 2016; 47 (8): 653-659.

  20. Santamaria MP, Neves FL, Silveira CA, Mathias IF, Fernandes-Dias SB, Jardini MA et al. Connective tissue graft and tunnel or trapezoidal flap for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017; 44 (5): 540-547.

  21. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Nguyen TVN, Tattan M, Ravidà A, Wang HL. Efficacy of tunnel technique in the treatment of localized and multiple gingival recessions: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 (9):1075-1090.

  22. Aydinyurt HS, Tekin Y, Ertugrul AS. The effect of enamel matrix derivatives on root coverage: a 12-month follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019; 33: e006.

  23. Kobayashi E, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Saulacic N, Schaller B, Sculean A, Miron RJ. Effect of enamel matrix derivative liquid in combination with a natural bone mineral on new bone formation in a rabbit GBR model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30 (6): 542-549.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Periodontol. 2019;10

ARTíCULOS SIMILARES

CARGANDO ...