medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales Médicos de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC

ISSN 0185-3252 (Print)
Revista de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2021; 66 (2)

Anterolateral approach to the hip arthroplasty

González UH, Soriano SHA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/100479

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/100479
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/100479

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 110-113
PDF size: 254.15 Kb.


Key words:

Approach, arthroplasty, anterolateral.

ABSTRACT

Approaches to hip replacement are always controversial as studies results are similar, in terms of success and complication rates. The lateral approach is one of the most used in the world with excellent functional results and low complication rates. The background of the approach, the main advantages and complications, as well as the author's preferences will be explained.


REFERENCES

  1. Jones RW, Roberts RE. Calcification, decalcification, and ossification1. Br J Surg [Internet]. 1934; 21 (83): 461-99. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article/21/83/461-499/6221212

  2. Parker MJ. Fractures of the neck of the femur. Trauma [Internet]. 2008; 10 (1): 43-53. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1460408608089640

  3. Foster DE, Hunter JR. The direct lateral approach to the hip for arthroplasty. Advantages and complications. Orthopedics [Internet]. 1987; 10 (2): 274-280. Available from: http://journals.healio.com/doi/10.3928/0147-7447-19870201-06

  4. Ilizaliturri VM Jr, Chaidez PA, Valero FS, Aguilera JM. Small incision total hip replacement by the lateral approach using standard instruments. Orthopedics. 2004; 27 (4): 377-381.

  5. Hoskins W, Dowsey MM, Spelman T, Choong PFM. Early surgical complications of total hip arthroplasty related to surgical approach. ANZ J Surg. 2020; 90 (10): 2050-2055.

  6. Specht K, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Kehlet H, Wedderkopp N, Pedersen BD. High patient satisfaction in 445 patients who underwent fast-track hip or knee replacement. Acta Orthop. 2015; 86 (6): 702-707.

  7. Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ. Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2010; 25 (5): 671-9.e1. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.002

  8. den Daas A, Reitsma EA, Knobben BAS, Ten Have BLEF, Somford MP. Patient satisfaction in different approaches for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2019; 105 (7): 1277-1282. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.003

  9. Aggarwal VK, Elbuluk A, Dundon J, Herrero C, Hernandez C, Vigdorchik JM et al. Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B (6): 646-651.

  10. Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (405): 46-53.



EVIDENCE LEVEL

III




Figure 1
Figure 2

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC. 2021;66