medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 07

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2021; 89 (07)

Adverse perinatal outcomes in fetuses with prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease

Reyes-Hernández MU, Bermúdez-Rentería LG, Cifuentes-Fernández EF, Hinojosa-Cruz JC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 516-523
PDF size: 196.69 Kb.


Key words:

Congenital heart disease, Fetuses, Prenatal diagnosis, Mexico, Fetal cardiology, Perinatal death, Premature birth.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes in fetuses with prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease in a tertiary level unit in Mexico City.
Materials and Methods: Observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study performed at the Fetal Cardiology Clinic of the High Specialty Medical Unit of the Hospital de Ginecoobstetricia 3, Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, in fetuses with prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease confirmed at birth, evaluated between January 2018 and June 2019. Study parameters: maternal demographic variables, type of heart disease and perinatal outcomes. Descriptive statistics and SPSS version 24 statistical package were used.
Results: Eighty-seven fetuses were analyzed, yielding a prevalence of congenital heart disease of 1.2% of the 6979 births registered during the study period. The most frequent heart diseases were arrhythmias (17 of 87), right heart lesions (17 of 87), complex anomalies (16 of 87) and left heart lesions (14 of 87). There were adverse perinatal outcomes in 62 of the 87 fetuses; perinatal deaths in 17 of 87 (orbits 4 of 87 and neonatal deaths 13 of 87), admitted to intensive care 35 of 87 and had preterm delivery 27 of 87.
Conclusions: The group of fetuses with prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease had a high prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes.


REFERENCES

  1. Wren C, Richmond S, Donaldson L. Temporal variability in birth prevalence of cardiovascular malformations. Heart 2000; 83 (4): 414-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ heart.83.4.414

  2. Moons P, Sluysmans T, De Wolf D, Massin M, et al. Congenital heart disease in 111 225 births in Belgium: birth prevalence, treatment and survival in the 21st century. Acta Paediatr 2009; 98 (3): 472-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1651-2227.2008.01152.x

  3. Torres-Cosme JL, Rolón-Porras C, Aguinaga-Ríos M, Acosta-Granado PM, et al. Mortality from congenital heart disease in Mexico: A problem on the rise. PLoS One 2016; 11 (3): e0150422. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0150422

  4. Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, Zhang S, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. Lancet 2016; 387 (10017): 462-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7

  5. Donofrio MT, Moon-Grady AJ, Hornberger LK, Copel JA, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129 (21): 2183-242. https://doi. org/10.1161/01.cir.0000437597.44550.5d

  6. Alva EC. Breve perspectiva histórica de las cardiopatías congénitas en el mundo y en México. Evid Med Invest Salud 2014; 7 (Suppl: 1): 39-43.

  7. Copado DY, Martínez GA, Acevedo GS. Importancia del diagnóstico prenatal de las cardiopatías congénitas. Perinatol Reprod Hum 2018; 32: 127-30. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rprh.2018.08.001

  8. Donofrio MT, Levy RJ, Schuette JJ, Skurow-Todd K, et al. Specialized delivery room planning for fetuses with critical congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2013; 111 (5): 737-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.029

  9. Ross LF, Frader J. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a paradigm case for examining conscientious objection in pediatric practice. J Pediatr 2009; 155 (1): 12-15. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.03.008

  10. Rempel GR, Cender LM, Lynam MJ, Sandor GG, et al. Parents' perspectives on decision making after antenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004; 33 (1): 64-70. https://doi. org/10.1177/0884217503261092

  11. Jackson C, Cheater FM, Reid I. A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions. Health Expect 2008; 11 (3): 232-51. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00496.x

  12. Cárdenas L, Enriquez G, Haecher S. Recién nacido portador de cardiopatía congénita compleja, análisis de riesgo, toma de decisiones y nuevas posibilidades terapéuticas. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes 2016; 27: 476-84. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2016.07.007

  13. Allan LD, Huggon IC. Counselling following a diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn 2004; 24 (13): 1136-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1071

  14. Menahem S, Grimwade J. Counselling strategies in the prenatal diagnosis of major heart abnormality. Heart Lung Circ 2004; 13 (3): 261-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. hlc.2004.06.009

  15. Menahem S, Grimwade J. Pre-natal counselling -helping couples make decisions following the diagnosis of severe heart disease. Early Hum Dev. 2005; 81 (7): 601-7. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.02.001

  16. Ochoa TM, Hernández HR, Hernández GJ, Luna GA, et al. Diagnóstico prenatal de cardiopatía fetal. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2007; 75: 509-14.

  17. Cruz-Lemini M, Nieto-Castro B, Luna-García J, Juárez- Martínez I, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: experience of the first Fetal Cardiology Unit in Mexico. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 1-6. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1638905

  18. Velázquez TB, Gallardo GJ, Acevedo GS, Guzmán HM. Abordaje diagnóstico de la cardiopatía fetal en el Instituto Nacional de Perinatología. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2008; 76: 431-9.

  19. San Luis MR, Arias ML, Gutiérrez GG, León AJ, et al. Eficacia de la ecocardiografía fetal. Experiencia clínica. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2008; 76: 706-16.

  20. De Los Santos López L. Frecuencia de cardiopatías congénitas en el recién nacido y factores maternos asociados en la UMAE HGO 3 (tesis). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, 2018.

  21. Xie D, Wang H, Liu Z, Fang J, et al. Perinatal outcomes and congenital heart defect prognosis in 53313 non-selected perinatal infants. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0177229. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177229

  22. Mendieta AG, Santiago AE, Mendieta HZ, Dorantes-Piña R, et al. Incidencia de las cardiopatías congénitas y los factores asociados a la letalidad en niños nacidos en dos hospitales del estado de México. Gac Med Mex 2013; 149: 617-23.

  23. Jortveit J, Øyen N, Leirgul E, Fomina T, et al. Trends in mortality of congenital heart defects. Congenit Heart Dis 2016; 11 (2): 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/chd.12307

  24. Thakur V, Dutil N, Schwartz SM, Jaeggi E. Impact of prenatal diagnosis on the management and early outcome of critical duct-dependent cardiac lesions. Cardiol Young 2018; 28 (4): 548-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951117002682




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2021;89