medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 08

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2021; 89 (08)

Placenta accreta post uterine artery embolization. Case report

Guarga-Montori M, Álvarez-Martínez A, Herrero-Barrios S, Marzo-Lorente M, Ruiz-Martínez S, Rojas Pérez-Ezquerra B
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 641-646
PDF size: 186.74 Kb.


Key words:

Uterine artery embolization, Myomas, Pregnancy trimester, third, Uterine myoma, Placenta previa, Cesarean section.

ABSTRACT

Background: Uterine artery embolization is an effective and minimally invasive therapeutic tool to treat patients with symptomatic myomas; however, its usefulness in patients with desire for pregnancy is controversial.
Objective: To analyze the usefulness of uterine artery embolization in patients with desire for pregnancy, diagnosed with symptomatic uterine myoma.
Clinical case: 37-year-old patient with myoma treated by uterine artery embolization in 2018; she became pregnant spontaneously two years after the intervention. Pregnancy elapsed with diagnosis of placenta previa and restricted intrauterine growth. During the cesarean section, indicated by bleeding in the third trimester, placental accretism was found, cause of uterine atony that required puerperal hysterectomy.
Conclusions: Although pregnancy following uterine artery embolization is possible, myomectomy is the technique of choice for the treatment of symptomatic myomas in women who desire pregnancy. The literature suggests that pregnancies following uterine artery embolization may be complicated by accreta, increased bleeding or cesarean section rate, but the analyses are heterogeneous. Patients should be adequately informed, and obstetricians should consider these complications in pregnancy follow-up.


REFERENCES

  1. Kröncke T, David M. Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) for Fibroid Treatment: Results of the 6th Radiological Gynecological Expert Meeting. Rofo 2017; 189 (6): 511-4. 10.1055/s-0043-106259

  2. Nogueira García J, Ruiz Sánchez E, Gómez García MT, González Costero R, González de Merlo G, Iglesias Goy E. Embolización de las arterias uterinas como alternativa de tratamiento para miomas uterinos. Experiencia en 60 pacientes. Progresos Obstet y Ginecol. 2014; 57 (8): 339-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pog.2014.04.008

  3. Kitson SJ, MacPhail S, Bulmer J. Is pregnancy safe after uterine artery embolisation? BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 119 (5): 519-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471- 0528.2012.03286.x

  4. Jitsumori M, Matsuzaki S, Endo M, Hara T, Tomimatsu T, Matsuzaki S, et al. Obstetric outcomes of pregnancy after uterine artery embolization. Int J Womens Health 2020; 12: 151-8. 10.2147/IJWH.S236443

  5. Cañete Palomo et al. Miomas uterinos. Protocolo asistencial en ginecología. Protoc Soc Española Ginecol Y Obstet 2015;

  6. Hernández-Valencia M, Valerio-Castro E, Tercero-Valdez- Zúñiga, CL B-VJ, Luna-Rojas R. Miomatosis uterina: implicaciones en salud reproductiva Uterine myomatosis : Implications on reproductive health. Ginecol Obs Mex 2017; 85 (9): 611-33.

  7. Torre A, Paillusson B, Fain V, Labauge P, Pelage JP, Fauconnier A. Uterine artery embolization for severe symptomatic fibroids: Effects on fertility and symptoms. Hum Reprod 2014; 29 (3): 490-501. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det459

  8. Pron G, Bennett J, Common A, Wall J, Asch M, Sniderman K. The Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial. Part 2. Uterine fibroid reduction and symptom relief after uterine artery embolization for fibroids. Fertil Steril 2003; 79 (1): 120-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04538-7

  9. Delplanque S, Le Lous M, Proisy M, Joueidi Y, Bauville E, Rozel C, et al. Fertility, Pregnancy, and Clinical Outcomes after Uterine Arteriovenous Malformation Management. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26 (1): 153-61. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.05.001

  10. Tropeano G, Di Stasi C AS et al. Long-term effects of uterine fibroid embolization on ovarian reserve: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 2296-300. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.007

  11. Czuczwar P, Stȩpniak A, Wrona W, Woźniak S, Milart P, Paszkowski T. The influence of uterine artery embolisation on ovarian reserve, fertility, and pregnancy outcomes - A review of literature. Prz Menopauzalny 2016; 15 (4): 205-9. 10.5114/pm.2016.65665

  12. Bonduki CE, Feldner PC, da Silva J, Castro RA, Sartori MGF, Girão MJBC. Pregnancy after uterine arterial embolization. Clinics 2011; 66 (5): 807-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/ S1807-59322011000500016

  13. Takahashi H, Hayashi S, Matsuoka K, Kitagawa M. Placenta accreta following uterine artery embolization. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 49 (2): 197-8. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S1028-4559(10)60041-1

  14. Lopes HI, Sá MI, Rodrigues RM. Pregnancy after Uterine Artery Embolization: A Case Report in a Woman with Leiomyomata. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2015; 2015: 1-3.

  15. Carpenter TT, Walker WJ. Pregnancy following uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids: A series of 26 completed pregnancies. Editorial comment. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005; 60 (8): 498-500. doi: 10.1097/01. ogx.0000172315.46878.48

  16. David M, Kröncke T. Uterine fibroid embolisation - Potential impact on fertility and pregnancy Outcome. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013; 73 (3): 247-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0032- 1328318




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2021;89