medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 3

<< Back

Rev Mex Urol 2021; 81 (3)

Overview of clean intermittent catheterization for neurogenic bladder in a developing country: Is the sterile single-use catheter really necessary?

Robles-Torres JI, Madero-Morales PA, Gutiérrez-González A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 6
Page: 1-4
PDF size: 113.15 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

Text Extraction

Intermittent catheterization is the treatment of choice for bladder drainage for incomplete emptying in patients with neurogenic bladder, including those with spinal injury, multiple sclerosis, and myelomeningocele. Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is considered the gold standard for bladder emptying. Since Lapides et al. established in their study that CIC was a safe and effective method, it has been widely used and is preferred to an indwelling catheter. In the US, an estimated 300,800 patients perform CIC, and approximately 1,500,000 catheters are used per day, for single-use catheterization. This practice further exacerbates a negative environmental impact, considering that biodegradation of the material most catheters are made of is almost nil, with the clear majority unlikely to degrade in fewer than one hundred years. Reused catheters have gained popularity in recent years, especially in developing countries, such as Mexico. Despite the frequency of that practice in our country, evidence on the safety of reused catheters is presently controversial.


REFERENCES

  1. Saadat SH, Shepherd S, Van Asseldonk B, Elterman DS. Clean intermittent catheterization: Single use vs. reuse. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;13(2):64–9. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5357

  2. Sun AJ, Comiter CV, Elliott CS. The cost of a catheter: An environmental perspective on single use clean intermittent catheterization. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(7):2204–8. doi: 10.1002/nau.23562

  3. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, Colgan R, Geerlings SE, Rice JC, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheterassociated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(5):625–63. doi: 10.1086/650482

  4. EAU Guidelines. Edn. at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam the Netherlands 2020. Netherlands; 2020.

  5. Prieto J, Murphy CL, Moore KN, Fader M. Intermittent catheterisation for longterm bladder management. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):CD006008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006008.pub3

  6. Madero-Morales PA, Robles-Torres JI, Vizcarra-Mata G, Guillén-Lozoya AH, Mendoza-Olazarán S, Garza-González E, et al. Randomized Clinical Trial Using Sterile Single Use and Reused Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization with a Clean Technique in Spina Bifida Cases: Short-Term Urinary Tract Infection Outcomes. J Urol. 2019;202(1):153–8. doi: 10.1097/ JU.0000000000000244




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2021;81