medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3038 (Print)

2020, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr 2020; 36 (3)

Contraception after an obstetric event

Zaldivar PAK, Fernández OMÁ, Ponce RER, Dávila MR

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 1-11
PDF size: 441.71 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The World Health Organization considers postpartum family planning as the main intervention that saves the lives of mothers and children, because, by favoring intergenetic periods of two or more years, it reduces infant and maternal mortality by 10% and 30%, respectively.
Objective: To determine the factors that influence the use of contraceptive methods after an obstetric event.
Methods: Descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study. Women of reproductive age were studied during the months of May and June of 2018, at a health center in Mexico City. 136 women participated who had up to a maximum of eleven months and 29 days after an obstetric event. An anonymous self-application questionnaire was prepared, consisting of 21 questions. The information was integrated into the program SPSS version 25, and analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: A significant correlation was found between the use of contraceptive methods after an obstetric event and the variables knowledge of the couple regarding the use of the contraceptive method (P<0.000), schooling of the patient (P<0.020), area of ​​the health center in which counseling was received (P<0.032), and number of monthly sexual relations (P<0.038).
Conclusions: The study permitted to determine four factors that influence the use of contraceptive methods after an obstetric event, which are directly related to the success or failure of prenatal family planning counseling.


REFERENCES

  1. WHO, HRP. Sexual health and its linkages to reproductive health: an operational approach. Geneva: WHO; 2017.

  2. MDG. United Nations-The Millennium Development Goals Report. United Nations. 2015[acceso: 12/04/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://visit.un.org/millenniumgoals/2008highlevel/pdf/MDG_Report_2008_Addendum.pdf

  3. Secretaria de Salud. Resolución por la que se modifica la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-005-SSA2-1993, De los servicios de planificación familiar. Estados Unidos Mexicanos; 2004[acceso: 26/03/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/rm005ssa293.html

  4. CONAPO. Situación de la Salud Sexual y Reproductiva. República Mexicana. 1ra ed. Consejo nacional de población. D.F.; 2016[acceso: 26/03/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/237216/Cuadernillo_SSR_RM.pdf

  5. WHO. Programming strategies for Postpartum Family Planning. Geneva; 2013[acceso: 26/03/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/93680/9789241506496_eng.pdf?sequence=1

  6. WHO. Family planning/Contraception. World Health Organization; 2018[acceso: 26/03/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception

  7. Darney BG, Sosa-Rubi SG, Servan-Mori E, Rodriguez MI, Walker D, Lozano R. The relationship of age and place of delivery with postpartum contraception prior to discharge in Mexico: A retrospective cohort study. Contraception. 2016;93(6):478-84. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.015

  8. Adia AC, Matos QP, Monteiro K, Kim HH. The Association Between Postpartum Healthcare Encounters and Contraceptive Use among Rhode Island Mothers, 2012-2015. RI Med J. 2018[acceso: 26/03/2019];101(3):29-32. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29608633

  9. Abraha TH, Teferra AS, Gelagay AA. Postpartum modern contraceptive use in northern Ethiopia: prevalence and associated factors. Epidemiol Health. 2017;39:e2017012.

  10. Loewenberg Weisband Y, Keder LM, Keim SA, Gallo MF. Postpartum intentions on contraception use and method choice among breastfeeding women attending a university hospital in Ohio: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):1-8.

  11. CONAPO. Tasa Global de Fecundidad y Tasa de Fecundidad Adolescente, 2009 y 2014. Datos.gob.mx. 2017[acceso: 25/04/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://datos.gob.mx/busca/dataset/salud-sexual-y-reproductiva/resource/cf3ec9ce-1c70-4327-b624-d3706bfd0647#

  12. Notimex. Disminuye tasa de fecundidad en México a 2.21 hijos por mujer. UNOTV. 2017[acceso: 25/04/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.unotv.com/noticias/portal/nacional/detalle/disminuye-tasa-fecundidad-mexico-221-hijos-por-mujer-221085/

  13. Zapata LB, Murtaza S, Whiteman MK, Jamieson DJ, Robbins CL, Marchbanks PA, et al. Contraceptive counseling and postpartum contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(2):171.e1-8.

  14. Siloe KM, Wanyenze RK, Lule H, Susan M K. Determinants of family planning service uptake and use of contraceptives among postpartum women in rural Uganda Katelyn. Int J Public Heal. 2016[acceso: 25/04/2019];60(8):987-97. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/gs_theses/602

  15. Berta M, Feleke A, Abate T, Worku T, Gebrecherkos T. Utilization and Associated Factors of Modern Contraceptives During Extended Postpartum Period among Women Who Gave Birth in the Last 12 Months in Gondar Town, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018;28(2):207-16.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com