medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Medicina General Integral

ISSN 1561-3038 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr 2020; 36 (3)

Cadillac risk score as a death predictor in patients with acute myocardial infraction and who received angioplasty

León SGF, León TED, Valdivieso MNE, Llimaico NMJ, Espinoza CFA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 1-9
PDF size: 375.76 Kb.


Key words:

angioplasty, score, acute myocardial infraction, mortality.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Myocardial infarction is one of the diseases that cause the most deaths worldwide. Studies show that, in patients with acute myocardial infarction, early percutaneous reperfusion (angioplasty) has better outcomes than isolated medical treatment in ventricular function, functional class, and early and late mortality.
Objective: To predict short-term death in patients with acute myocardial infarction who have been received angioplasty.
Methods: Retrospective and cross-sectional research, whose data was collected from medical records at a cardiology center in Ecuador. The sample consisted of 50 patients who met the inclusion criteria, whose data were assessed according the CADILLAC risk score, used as an instrument, taking into account survival at thirty days after the procedure.
Results: The mortality rate at 30 days was 22%, of which 32.3% belonged to the age group over 65 years. The most influential mortality predictors were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) under 40% (73.3%), final flow of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) under grade 2 (46.1%), anemia (66.6%), and the presence of heart failure (42,3 %).
Conclusion: The CADILLAC risk score is an important predictor for mortality. Anemia should be taken into account as a mortality predictor.


REFERENCES

  1. Alvarez Toledo, Orlando, Claro Valdez Ramon , Senra PiedraGerardo, Gomez Padron Maria . Sindrome Coronario Agudo. Diagnostico y tratamiento. 2018[acceso: 28/01/2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.sld.cu/galerias/pdf/sitios/cardiologia/protocolo_de_sind_coronario_agudo.pdf

  2. Avalos Cabrera Jesus, Carranza Wuispe Fernando. Características clínico epidemiológicas de pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo de la unidad de cuidados intensivos del Hospital Félix Torrealva Gutiérrez. Ica, Perú. 2daed. 2012 [acceso: 18/01/2015]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://revistas.unica.edu.pe/index.php/panacea/article/view/141

  3. Martínez-Sánchez C, Jerjes-Sánchez C, Nicolau JC, Bazzino O, Antepara N, Marmol R. Síndromes coronarios agudos en Latinoamérica: lecciones aprendidas del registro ACCESS. Rev Médica Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2017[acceso: 28/01/2019];54(6):726-37. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/imss/im-2016/im166g.pdf

  4. Wayne Warnica James. Angina inestable. (Insuficiencia coronaria aguda, angina previa al infarto, sindrome intermedio). Manual MSD. Versión para profesionales; 2016[acceso: 22/02/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.msdmanuals.com/es-ec/professional/trastornos-cardiovasculares/enfermedad-coronaria/angina-inestable

  5. Sprockel Díaz Jhon, González Russi Magda, Barón Rafael. Escalas de riesgo en el diagnóstico de la angina inestable en pacientes con dolor torácico con electrocardiograma y biomarcadores negativos. Repertorio de Medicina y Cirugia. 2016[acceso: 21/01/2018];25(3):156-62. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0121737216300334

  6. Batista I, Alonso S, Mayol J. Angioplastia primaria en el infarto agudo de miocardio. Rev Urug Cardiol. 2013[acceso: 25/05/2015].;28(3):437-451. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?pid=S1688-04202013000300018&script=sci_arttext

  7. González-Pacheco H, Arias-Mendoza A, Álvarez-Sangabriel A, Juárez-Herrera Ú, Damas F, Eid-Lidt G, et al. The TIMI risk score for STEMI predicts in-hospital mortality and adverse events in patients without cardiogenic shock undergoing primary angioplasty. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2012;82(1):7-13.

  8. Littnerova S, Kala P, Jarkovsky J, Kubkova L, Prymusova K, Kubena P, et al. GRACE Score among six risk scoring systems (CADILLAC, PAMI, TIMI, Dynamic TIMI, Zwolle) demonstrated the best predictive value for prediction of long-term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. PloS One. 2015[acceso: 08/08/2016];10(4):e0123215. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0123215

  9. Yu T, Tian C, Song J, He D, Sun Z, Sun Z. ACTION (acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network) registry-GWTG (get with the guidelines) risk score predicts long-term mortality in acute myocardial infarction. Oncotarget. 2017[acceso: 28/01/2019];8(60):102559. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5731981/

  10. Méndez-Eirín E, Flores-Ríos X, García-López F, Pérez-Pérez AJ, Estévez-Loureiro R, Piñón-Esteban P, et al. Comparación del valor predictivo pronóstico de los scores TIMI, PAMI, CADILLAC y GRACE en el SCACEST sometido a ICP primario o de rescate. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012[acceso: 18/08/2014];65(3):227-33. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300893211008918

  11. Sharkawi MA, Filippaios A, Dani SS, Shah SP, Riskalla N, Venesy DM, et al. Identifying patients for safe early hospital discharge following st elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017[acceso: 24/04/2018].;89(7):1141-46. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ccd.26873

  12. Halkin A, Singh M, Nikolsky E, Grines CL, Tcheng JE, Garcia E, et al. Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: the CADILLAC risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005[acceso: 27/03/2012];45(9):1397-405. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/45/9/1397.abstract

  13. Littnerova S, Kala P, Jarkovsky J, Kubkova L, Prymusova K, Kubena P, et al. GRACE Score among six risk scoring systems (CADILLAC, PAMI, TIMI, Dynamic TIMI, Zwolle) demonstrated the best predictive value for prediction of long-term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. PloS One. 2015;10(4):e0123215.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr. 2020;36