medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Medicina Intensiva y Emergencias

ISSN 1810-2352 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Med Int Emerg 2020; 19 (2)

Prognostic indices in predicting acute pancreatitis severity

González AJC, Díaz MRE, Cabrera LJO, Martí GGM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 1-13
PDF size: 246.47 Kb.


Key words:

acute pancreatitis, forecast, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II, Glasgow modified, bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Several prognostic evaluation systems are used in acute pancreatitis (AP).
Objective: To assess the ability of various prognostic indices to predict acute pancreatitis severity.
Methods: An observational and prospective study was conducted in the Intensive Care Unit at Carlos Manuel de Céspedes General University Hospital, in Granma province, from February 1, 2015 to September 30, 2018, including sixty-four patients with diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and the Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis were prognostic indices applied in the first 24 hours at admission; modified Glasgow prognostic index was used at 48 hours. Severity was considered according to the 2012 Atlanta consensus classification. Age, sex, laboratory findings, types and ethology of pancreatitis, and prognostic indices were used as variables. Statistical analysis of correlation between the indices was performed using the receiver operator curve.
Results: There was positive correlation between the indices, but better correlation was observed between the modified Glasgow and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (r = 0.811, p = 0.000) prognostic indices. In patients with modified Glasgow 3, the risk of developing severe acute pancreatitis was doubled significantly (RR 1.9 95% CI 1.3 - 2.7 p = 0.000). Similar occurred for the Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis ˃2 (RR 1.4 95% CI 1.2 - 1.7, p = 0.008) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II ˃8 (RR 1.5 IC 95% 1.5-1.8, p = 0.004). All the indices had good predictability, but the largest area under the operator-receiver curve was the modified Glasgow (0.944 95% CI 0.891 - 0.988).
Conclusions: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II indices, as well as the Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis and Glasgow index had a good ability to predict the severity of acute pancreatitis, nonetheless Glasgow index showed greater predictive value compared to the others.


REFERENCES

  1. Tenner S, Baillie J, De Witt J, Vegue SS. American College of Gastroenterology Guideline: Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(9):1400-415.

  2. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis - 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013 [citado: 16/11/2018];62(1):102-11. Disponible en: http://gut.bmj.com/content/62/1/102

  3. Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM. Acute Pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016 [citado: 16/11/2018];375:1972-81. Disponible en: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1505202

  4. Choi JH, Kim MH, Cho DH, Oh D, Lee HW, Song TJ, et al. Revised Atlanta Classification and determinant based- classification: Which one better at stratifying outcomes of patients with acute pancreatitis? Pancreatology. 2017 Mar- Abr;17(2):194-200.

  5. Pintado MC, Trascasa M, Arenillas C, de Zárate YO, Pardo A, Blandino Ortiz A, et al. New Atlanta Classification of Acute pancreatitis in intensive care unit: Complications and prognosis. Eur J Intern Med. 2016 May;30:82-7.

  6. Cho JH, Kim TN, Chung HH, Kim KH. Comparison of scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 [citado: 16/11/2018];21(8):2387-94. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342915/

  7. Kim BG, Noh MH, Ryu CH, Nam HS, Woo SM, Ryu SH, et al. A comparison of the BISAP score and serum procalcitonin for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. Korean J Intern Med. 2013 [citado: 16/11/2018];28(3):322-9. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2013.28.3.322

  8. Koziel D, Gluszek S, Matykiewicz J, Lewitowicz P, Drozdzak Z. Comparative analysis of selected scales to assess prognosis in acute pancreatitis. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 [citado: 16/11/2018];29(6):299-303. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578452/

  9. Gao W, Yang H-X, Ma C-E. The Value of BISAP Score for Predicting Mortality and Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015 [citado: 16/11/2018];10(6):e0130412. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4474919/

  10. Chandra S, Murali A, Bansal R, Agarwal D, Holm A. The Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: a systematic review of prospective studies to determine predictive performance. J C Hosp Intern Persp. 2017 [citado: 16/11/2018];7(4):208-13. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2017.1361292

  11. Kumar AH, Griwan MS. A comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson’s scoreand modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on the 2012 revised Atlanta Classification. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018 [citado: 16/11/2018];6(2):127-31. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952961/

  12. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit. Care Med. 1985;13(10):818-29.

  13. Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, Tabak Y, Conwell DL, Banks PA. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study. Gut. 2008 [citado: 16/11/2018];57(12):1698-703. Disponible en: https://gut.bmj.com/content/57/12/1698.long

  14. Blamey SL, Imrie CW, O’ Neill J, Wilmour WH, Carter DC. Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1984 [citado: 16/11/2018];25(12):1340-6. Disponible en: https://gut.bmj.com/content/25/12/1340.full.pdf

  15. Kiat TTJ, Gunasekaran SK, Junnarkar SP, Low JK, Woon W, Shelat VG. Are traditional scoring systems for severity stratification of acute pancreatitis sufficient? Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018 [citado: 16/11/2018];22:105-15. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.105

  16. Hong W, Lin S, Zippi M, Geng W, Stock S, Zimmer V, et al. High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Blood Urea Nitrogen, and Serum Creatinine Can Predict Severe Acute Pancreatitis. BioMed Research International. 2017 [citado: 16/11/2018];2017:1-7. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1648385

  17. Williams M, Simms HH. Prognostic usefulness of scoring systems in critically ill patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Crit Care Med. 1999 [citado: 16/11/2018];27(5):901-7. Disponible en: http://insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=10362411

  18. Gomatos IP, Xiadong X, Ghaneh P, Halloran C, Raraty M, Lane B, et al. Prognostic markers in acute pancreatitis. Expert Rev Mol Diag. 2014 [citado: 16/11/2018];14(3):333-46. Disponible en: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/full/10.1586/14737159.2014.897608




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cub Med Int Emerg. 2020;19