medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología

ISSN 3061-8142 (Electronic)
ISSN 0484-7903 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2006; 29 (4)

Post-surgical analgesia with morphine in only doses, in orthopedic surgery of the hip and knee

Gómez-Márquez JJ, Estrada-Medrano A, Polendo-Villarreal JA, Martínez-Elizondo SG, Sepúlveda-Oyervides VM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 209-214
PDF size: 87.93 Kb.


Key words:

Epidural analgesia, hip surgery, knee surgery, morphine.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the use of epidural morphine after prosthetic surgery of the hip and knee, in order to address the need for effective and safe analgesia. Materials and methods: Fifty patients were divided into two groups: Group A (study group, n = 25), Group B (control group, n = 25). A mixed blockade was applied in both groups, administering 12.5 mg bupivacaine in the subarachnoid space and placing an inert epidural catheter. After the surgical procedure was finished, Group A was given 2 mg morphine in 8 ml water through the epidural catheter. Intravenous metamizole sodium, 35 mg/kg/24 hours in three divided doses, could be used as rescue analgesia. Group B was given intravenous metamizole, 35 mg/kg/24 hours in three divided doses. Nalbuphine, 0.075 mg/kg/dose, could be used as rescue analgesia. The same visual and verbal scale were used in both groups. Nausea, emesis, pruritus, urinary retention and ventilatory depression were assessed as safety parameters. Variance analysis of the scales was used as a statistical tool. Results: There were no differences among groups in demographic data and adverse events. Pain scales in both groups showed differences among baseline values and those recorded later on. Statistic analysis demonstrated better analgesia and less use of rescue analgesia in group A. Conclusions: Epidural morphine was effective for the control of postoperative pain, but not statistically superior. Rescue analgesia was needed in both groups.


REFERENCES

  1. Nalda MA. De la neuroleptoanalgesia a la anestesia analgésica. Salvat. 2° edición. Química de los Morfinomiméticos. México 1980:9-40.

  2. Aldrete A. Mecanismo de integración y modulación del dolor. Tratado de Algología 1999;1:39-59.

  3. Murphy P, et al. Optimizing the dose of intrathecal morphine in older patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Anesth & Analg 2003;97:1709-15.

  4. Wolf AR, Hughes D, Hobbs AJ, et al. Combined morphine-bupivacaine caudals for reconstructive penile surgery in children: systemic absorption of morphine and postoperative analgesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1991;19:17-21.

  5. Figueira M, Pensado A, Vázquez Fidalgo A, et al. Early extubation with caudal morphine after pediatric heart surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2003;50:64–69.

  6. Castillo C, Castillo Peralta L, Nava A. Dose minimization study of single-dose epidural morphine in patients undergoing hip surgery under regional anesthesia with bupivacaine. Pediatric Anestesia 2004;15:29-36.

  7. Likar SR, Mousa GA, Philippitsch H, Steinkellner, Koppert CW, Stein M Schäfer. Increased numbers of opioid expressing inflammatory cells do not affect intra-articular morphine analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2004;93:375-80.

  8. Marchal J, Delgado A, Poncela M. Valenzuela J, Luna J. Does the type of arthroscopic surgery modify the analgesic effect of intraarticular morphine and bupivacaine? A Preliminary Study. Clinical J Pain 2003;19:240-6.

  9. Davies A, Segar E, Murdoch J, Wright D, Wilson I. Epidural infusion or combined femoral and sciatic nerve blocks as perioperative analgesia for knee arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth 2004;93:368–74.

  10. Chestnut D. Efficacy and saffety of epidural opioids for postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology 2005;102:221-3.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Anest. 2006;29