medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Orthotips AMOT

ISSN 2007-8560 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión Científica de la Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Ortopedia y Traumatología, A.C. (FEMECOT)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Ortho-tips 2021; 17 (4)

Systematic review: the highest level of evidence

Salcido RMV, Vargas TA, Medina VNA, Ramírez AF, García SMO, Briseño GAM, Jiménez ÁJM
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/102220

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/102220
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/102220

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 217-221
PDF size: 134.20 Kb.


Key words:

Systematic review, meta-analysis, evidence-based medicine, Cochrane.

ABSTRACT

The systematic review is a publication of secondary source, that is, it summarizes the information of primary articles, however it is necessary that the elaboration process is described in a transparent and understandable way, from the collection of articles, the criteria of the articles and the analysis of the results, to make it systematic. We can make a review of a topic without it being systematic, the difference is always the degree of evidence, the meta-analysis is the statistical analysis of two or more studies, these articles do not come from a systematic review, nor do all systematic reviews have meta-analysis. Systematic review is a scientific investigation that attempts to answer a research question. The elaboration process can be divided into simple stages, but it is important to show what was done in the study as well as the search dates. 1. Define the research question, 2. Establish eligibility criteria, 3. Establish the search strategy, 4. Analyze the bias and the results of the chosen studies, and 5. Interpretation and presentation of the results.


REFERENCES

  1. Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, traductores. Manual Cochrane de Revisiones Sistemáticas de Intervenciones, versión 5.1.0 [actualizada en marzo de 2011] [Internet]. Barcelona: Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano; 2012. Disponible en: http://www.cochrane.es/?q=es/node/269

  2. Centeno-Romero M, Chacón-Arrieta G, Vega-Aguilar JA, Gonzalez-Torres A, Leitón-Jiménez J. Revisión sistemática de literatura: aplicaciones de las comunicaciones moleculares. Revista Tecnología En Marcha. 2021; 34 (2): 147-160.

  3. Donato H, Donato M. Stages for undertaking a systematic review. Acta Med Port. 2019; 32 (3): 227-235.

  4. Ferreira González I, Urrútia G, Alonso-Coello P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: scientific rationale and interpretation. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011; 64 (8): 688-696.

  5. Pollock A, Berge E. How to do a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2018; 13 (2): 138-156.

  6. Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: Methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13 (3): 132-140.




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Table 1

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ortho-tips. 2021;17