medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica Grupo Angeles

Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
    • Names and affiliations of the Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • About us
    • Data sharing policy
    • Stated aims and scope
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2021; 19 (4)

Concordance of ultrasound airway assessment versus traditional scales and its relationship to complications of orotracheal intubation

Cázares SJ, Torres ACJ, García MMA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/102535

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/102535
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/102535

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 501-505
PDF size: 167.58 Kb.


Key words:

Assessment, airway, ultrasound, results.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Ultrasound imaging is a promising tool for pre-anesthetic assessment of the airway. Objective: To evaluate the concordance of the ultrasound airway assessment versus traditional scales and its relationship with complications during orotracheal intubation. Material y methods: An observational, cross-sectional, prospective study performed in patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia. In the pre-anesthetic consultation, they were assessed with predictive scales of difficult intubation (USG group [n = 16] and T group [n = 19]) and in the patients of the USG group, ultrasonographic measurements of difficult intubation were performed. The frequency of complications was recorded during intubation. Results: The concordance of difficult airway ultrasound findings with Mallampati III/IV and Cormack-Lehane III/IV was 43.8-62.5%. Oral cavity lesions occurred in 0% of the USG group and in 15.8% of the T group (p = 0.096). The incidence of pharyngeal pain was 25% in the USG group and 31.6% in the T group (p = 0.723). Conclusions: The concordance of non-visible hyoid bone and increased tongue thickness with traditional difficult airway scales was poor. But when the airway was assessed preoperatively with the US, there was a trend towards a lower frequency of lesions of the oral cavity.


REFERENCES

  1. Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Pasternak LR, Arens JF, Caplan RA, et al. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society Of Anesthesiologists task force on preanesthesia evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2012; 116 (3): 522-538.

  2. Escobar J. ¿Cuánto podemos predecir la vía aérea difícil?. Rev Chil Anest. 2009; 38: 85-89.

  3. Alanís UK, Guerrero MF, Gómez CJR. Relación entre la circunferencia del cuello y vía aérea difícil en pacientes obesos. Anest Mex [Online]. 2017; 29 (2): 18-27.

  4. Orozco-Díaz E, Álvarez-Ríos JJ, Arceo-Díaz JL, Ornelas-Aguirre JM. Predicción de intubación difícil mediante escalas de valoración de la vía aérea. Cir Cir. 2010; 78 (5): 393-399.

  5. Falcetta S, Cavallo S, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Sorbello M, Zdravkovic I et al. Evaluation of two neck ultrasound measurements as predictors of difficult direct laryngoscopy: A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018; 35 (8): 605-612.

  6. Norskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, Astrup G, Afshari A, Lundstrom LH. Diagnostic accuracy of anaesthesiologists' prediction of difficult airway management in daily clinical practice: a cohort study of 188,064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Anaesthesia. 2015; 70 (3): 272-281.

  7. Norskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, Lundstrom LH. Incidence of unanticipated difficult airway using an objective airway score versus a standard clinical airway assessment: the DIFFICAIR trial-trial protocol for a cluster randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2013; 14: 347.

  8. Heinrich S, Birkholz T, Irouschek A, Ackermann A, Schmidt J. Incidences and predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia : a single-center analysis of 102,305 cases. J Anesth. 2013; 27 (6): 815-821.

  9. Carrillo-Esper R, Nava-López JA, Romero-Sierra G, Cáñez-Jiménez C. Evaluación ultrasonográfica de la vía aérea superior. Rev Mex Anestesiol. 2014; 37 (2): 123-130.

  10. Votruba J, Zemanová P, Lambert L, Vesela MM. The role of airway and endobronchial ultrasound in perioperative medicine. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 754626.

  11. Wojtczak JA. Submandibular sonography: assessment of hyomental distances and ratio, tongue size, and floor of the mouth musculature using portable sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2012; 31 (4): 523-528.

  12. Petrisor C, Dirzu D, Tranca S, Hagau N, Bodolea C. Preoperative difficult airway prediction using suprahyoid and infrahyoid ultrasonography derived measurements in anesthesiology. Med Ultrason. 2019; 21 (1): 83-88.

  13. Fulkerson JS, Moore HM, Anderson TS, Lowe RFJ. Ultrasonography in the preoperative difficult airway assessment. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017; 31 (3): 513-530.

  14. Kundra P, Mishra SK, Ramesh A. Ultrasound of the airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2011; 55 (5): 456-462.

  15. Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Graumann O, Laursen CB. Ultrasonography for clinical decision-making and intervention in airway management: from the mouth to the lungs and pleurae. Insights Imaging. 2014; 5 (2): 253-279.

  16. Singh M, Chin KJ, Chan VW, Wong DT, Prasad GA, Yu E. Use of sonography for airway assessment: an observational study. J Ultrasound Med. 2010; 29 (1): 79-85.

  17. Yao W, Wang B. Can tongue thickness measured by ultrasonography predict difficult tracheal intubation? Br J Anaesth. 2017; 118 (4): 601-609.

  18. Yadav NK, Rudingwa P, Mishra SK, Pannerselvam S. Ultrasound measurement of anterior neck soft tissue and tongue thickness to predict difficult laryngoscopy - An observational analytical study. Indian J Anaesth. 2019; 63 (8): 629-634.

  19. Bajracharya G, Truong A, Truong D, Cata J. Ultrasound-assisted evaluation of the airway in clinical anesthesia practice: past, present and future. Int J Anesth Pain Med. 2015; 1 (2): 1-10.

  20. Soltani Mohammadi S, Saliminia A, Nejatifard N, Azma R. Usefulness of ultrasound view of larynx in pre-anesthetic airway assessment: a comparison with Cormack-Lehane classification during direct laryngoscopy. Anesthl Pain Med. 2016; 6 (6): e39566-e39566.

  21. Gupta D, Srirajakalidindi A, Ittiara B, Apple L, Toshniwal G, Haber H. Ultrasonographic modification of Cormack Lehane classification for pre-anesthetic airway assessment. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2012; 21 (6): 835-842.

  22. Jain K, Yadav M, Gupta N, Thulkar S, Bhatnagar S. Ultrasonographic assessment of airway. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020; 36 (1): 5-12.

  23. Altun D, Kara H, Bozbora E, Ali A, Dinc T, Sonmez S et al. The role of indirect laryngoscopy, clinical and ultrasonographic assessment in prediction of difficult airway. Laryngoscope. 2021; 131 (2): E555-E560.




Figure 1
Figure 2
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med. 2021;19