medigraphic.com
ISSN 0035-0052 (Print)

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Pediatr 2021; 88 (4)

Virtual versus standard training of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for neonates and infants: a systematic review

Velásquez-Velásquez E, Zapata-Ospina JP, Mora-Escallón D, Patiño-Lugo DF

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 133-142
PDF size: 288.63 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To synthesize the evidence that compares face-to-face methods with virtual methods for teaching neonatal and infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Material and methods: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), in which health personnel are included for training in CPR. Two authors selected, synthesized and assessed the quality of the studies. Due to the high heterogeneity between studies, no meta-analysis was carried out. Results: Five RCTs that trained 315 people were included: 160 virtual and 155 standard. The studies are different in terms of virtual teaching, type of participants and evaluation of the effectiveness of the interventions. However, in terms of knowledge acquisition, there seems to be no difference between the two educational techniques. In technical skills, the standard form produced better overall performance than using video. On non-technical skills, tele-education generated high levels of satisfaction. Conclusions: There are very few RCTs where the virtual modality has been compared with the face-to-face modality for teaching neonates and infants CPR. Therefore, it is necessary to increase research to determine if the virtual modality is effective for CPR, both in knowledge and skills. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42019116444.


REFERENCES

  1. Gaffey MF, Das JK, Bhutta ZA. Millennium development goals 4 and 5: past and future progress. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 20: 285-292.

  2. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005; 365: 891-900.

  3. Dempsey E, Pammi M, Ryan AC et al. Standardised formal resuscitation training programmes for reducing mortality and morbidity in newborn infants (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015.

  4. Atkins DL, Everson-Stewart S, Sears GK et al. Epidemiology and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children. Circulation. 2009; 119: 1484-1491.

  5. Kumar VR, Bachman DT, Kiskaddon RT. Children and adults in cardiopulmonary arrest: are advanced life support guidelines followed in the prehospital setting? Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 29: 743-747.

  6. American Heart Association. 2015 AHA Guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) science. Circulation. 2015; 132: S519-S560.

  7. Mancini ME, Diekema DS, Hoadley TA et al. Part 3: Ethical issues. Circulation. 2015; 132: S383-S396.

  8. Ades A, Lee HC. Update on simulation for the Neonatal Resuscitation Program. Semin Perinatol. 2016; 40: 447-454.

  9. Reisman J, Arlington L, Jensen L et al. Newborn resuscitation training in resource-limited settings: a systematic literature review. Pediatrics. 2016; 138: e20154490.

  10. Ashish KC, Wrammert J, Nelin V et al. Evaluation of Helping Babies Breathe Quality Improvement Cycle (HBB-QIC) on retention of neonatal resuscitation skills six months after training in Nepal. BMC Pediatr. 2017; 17: 1-9.

  11. Bracq MS, Michinov E, Jannin P. Virtual reality simulation in nontechnical skills training for healthcare professionals. Simul Healthc. 2019; 14: 188-194.

  12. Lau Y, Nyoe RSS, Wong SN et al. Effectiveness of digital resuscitation training in improving knowledge and skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Resuscitation. 2018; 131: 14-23.

  13. Higgins JP, Altman DG. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2008 [Epub ahead of print 2008]. doi: 10.1002/9780470712184.ch8.

  14. Review Manager (RevMan) [Software]. Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020.

  15. Stephan F, Groetschel H, Büscher AK, et al. Teaching paediatric basic life support in medical schools using peer teaching or video demonstration: A prospective randomised trial. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018; 54: 981-986.

  16. Jain A, Agarwal R, Chawla D, et al. Tele-education vs classroom training of neonatal resuscitation: a randomized trial. J Perinatol. 2010; 30: 773-779.

  17. Amin H, Singhal N, Beran T, et al. Use of simulation-based skill acquisition instruction (SSAI) for manual mask ventilation (MMV) improves the ability of neonatal resuscitation program (NRP)providers to deliver and retain effective MMV skills. Paediatr Child Health. 2018; 23: e48.

  18. Drummond D, Arnaud C, Guedj R, et al. Google Glass for residents dealing with pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest: a randomized, controlled, simulation-based study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017; 18: 120-127.

  19. Fang JL, Carey WA, Lang TR, et al. Real-time video communication improves provider performance in a simulated neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2014; 85: 1518-1522.

  20. Chipps J, Brysiewicz P, Mars M. A systematic review of the effectiveness of videoconference-based tele-education for medical and nursing education. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012; 9: 78-87.

  21. Gonzalez-Espada WJ, Hall-Barrow J, Hall RW et al. Achieving success connecting academic and practicing clinicians through telemedicine. Pediatrics. 2009; 123: e476-e483.

  22. Munyoka W. Evaluation impact of tele-education as new open distance learning delivery mode on learners in Botswana. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2014; 116: 1248-1252.

  23. Burke BL, Hall RW. Telemedicine: pediatric applications. Pediatrics. 2015; 136: e293-e308.

  24. Holmberg B. Distance education theory again. Open Learning. 1997; 12: 31-39.

  25. Davis PG, Dawson JA. New concepts in neonatal resuscitation. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012; 24: 147-153.

  26. Foglia EE, Te Pas AB. Effective ventilation: the most critical intervention for successful delivery room resuscitation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 23: 340-346.

  27. Arafeh JMR, Hansen SS, Nichols A. Debriefing in simulated-based learning. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2010; 24: 302-309.

  28. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc. 2007; 2: 115-125.

  29. Silva AC, Bernardes A, Évora YD et al. Development of a virtual learning environment for cardiorespiratory arrest training. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2016; 50: 990-997.

  30. Totten A, Womack D, Eden K et al. Telehealth: Mapping the evidence for patient outcomes from systematic reviews. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2016.

  31. Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 154-161.

  32. Butler LC. The impact of telemedicine on teamwork and communication, workload, and clinical performance: a randomized controlled trial [Thesis]. USA: Yale University School of Medicine; 2017.

  33. Fang JL, Campbell MS, Weaver AL et al. The impact of telemedicine on the quality of newborn resuscitation: a retrospective study. Resuscitation. 2018; 125: 48-55.

  34. Colby CE, Fang JL, Carey WA. Remote video neonatal consultation: a system to improve neonatal quality, safety and efficiency. Resuscitation. 2014; 85: e29-e30.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com