medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Trasplantes

ISSN 2007-6800 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Traspl 2021; 10 (3)

BK virus nephropathy in grafting biopsies in Veracruz

Luna-Salinas JA, Argüelles-Morales AD, Martínez-Mier G, Budar-Fernández LF
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/102862

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/102862
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/102862

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 79-85
PDF size: 270.56 Kb.


Key words:

BK virus, nephropathy, SV40 antigen, kidney graft biopsies, prevalence.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: BK virus nephropathy is an infectious pathology produced by the BK virus, also known as polyomavirus, which manifests in post-transplanted renal graft patients due to pharmacological immunosuppression, resulting in long-term damage and loss of the renal graft. Objective: To determine the prevalence of BK virus nephropathy in renal graft biopsies of recipients of the UMAE HE No. 14 "Adolfo Ruiz Cortines". Material and methods: Descriptive, observational and retrospective study in the Nephrology Service UMAE HE No. 14 "Adolfo Ruiz Cortines". Biopsied renal graft recipients older than 18 years were included. SV40 antigen positivity was determined and BK virus prevalence was calculated. Results: We considered 101 biopsies, 60 men, mean age 31.85 ± 10.67 years. The 85.14% received live graft. The prevalence of BK virus nephropathy was 8.91%. Induction therapy was: 45.54% basiliximab, 27.72% thymoglobulin and 26.73% methylprednisolone. For maintenance therapy the treatment was tacrolimus 51.48%, cyclosporine 34.65% and sirolimus 13.86%. Of the total number of SV40-positive patients, the induction treatment that most patients received was basiliximab in 66.66%, followed by thymoglobulin 22.22% and methylprednisolone 11.11%. Maintenance therapy in these cases was with cyclosporine 55.55% and tacrolimus 44.44%. A correlation between positive and negative patient variables was performed using χ2 and showed no significant statistical difference. Conclusions: The prevalence reported in this study is similar to that reported in other hospital centers.


REFERENCES

  1. Barreto P, Almeida M, Dias L. BK virus nephropathy in kidney transplantation: a literature review. Port J Nephrol Hypert. 2016; 30 (4): 259-268.

  2. Alcendor DJ. BK polyomavirus virus glomerular tropism: implications for virus reactivation from latency and amplification during immunosuppression. J Clin Med. 2019; 8 (9): 1477. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091477.

  3. Castillo AA, Borrego GR, Sotelo CM, Ríos TJ. Frecuencia de infección por poliomavirus BK en pacientes con trasplante renal. Archivos de Salud de Sinaloa. 2007; 1 (3): 92-96.

  4. Sharma R, Tzetzo S, Patel S, Zachariah M, Sharma S, Melendy T. BK virus in kidney transplant: current concepts, recent advances, and future directions. Exp Clin Transplant. 2016; 14 (4): 377-384. doi: 10.6002/ect.2016.0030.

  5. Barth H, Solis M, Lepiller Q, Sueur C, Soulier E, Caillard S et al. 45 years after the discovery of human polyomaviruses BK and JC: Time to speed up the understanding of associated diseases and treatment approaches. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2017; 43 (2): 178-195. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2016.1189873.

  6. Li P, Cheng D, Wen J, Ni X, Li X, Xie K et al. The immunophenotyping of different stages of BK virus allograft nephropathy. Ren Fail. 2019; 41 (1): 855-861. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2019.1617168.

  7. Ambalathingal GR, Francis RS, Smyth MJ, Smith C, Khanna R. BK polyomavirus: clinical aspects, immune regulation, and emerging therapies. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017; 30 (2): 503-528. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00074-16.

  8. Zeljka VH, Nika K. Viral infections after kidney transplantation: CMV and BK. Perioperative care for organ transplant recipient. 2019.

  9. Rodríguez Rodríguez RN, Hernández León CN, Salido Ruiz E. Nefropatía por BK virus: a propósito de 2 casos. ISBN 978-84-692-76778.

  10. Sawinski D, Trofe-Clark J. BK virus nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018; 13 (12): 1893-1896. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04080318.

  11. Dalianis T, Eriksson BM, Felldin M, Friman V, Hammarin AL, Herthelius M et al. Management of BK-virus infection - Swedish recommendations. Infect Dis (Lond). 2019; 51 (7): 479-484. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2019.1595130.

  12. Steubl D, Baumann M, Schuster T, Fischereder M, Kramer BK, Heemann U et al. Risk factors and interventional strategies for BK polyomavirus infection after renal transplantation. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012; 46 (6): 466-474. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.726643.

  13. Oppenheimer Salinas F, Pascual Santos J, Pallardó Mateu L. Inmunosupresión en el trasplante renal. Nefrología al Día. 2020.

  14. Lamarche C, Orio J, Collette S, Senécal L, Hébert MJ, Renoult E et al. BK polyomavirus and the transplanted kidney: immunopathology and therapeutic approaches. Transplantation. 2016; 100 (11): 2276-2287.

  15. Mallavarapu RK, Sanoff SL, Howell DN, Roberts JK. BK virus nephropathy in non-renal solid organ transplant recipients: Are we looking hard enough? Clin Transplant. 2021; 35 (5): e14265. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14265.

  16. Torres Santander MB, Guañuna Ma, Garcés N. Infección por Poliomavirus en pacientes trasplantados renales del Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín, enero 2013 a diciembre 2014. Cambios Rev Med. 2017; 15 (1): 6-23.

  17. Avellán Boza M. Perfil epidemiológico de pacientes trasplantados de riñón con citología urinaria por virus BK positiva en el servicio de nefrología del Hospital Rafael Ángel Calderón Guardia en el periodo comprendido entre febrero 2013 y junio 2014 [Tesis]. Costa Rica: Universidad de Costa Rica. Sistema de Estudio de Posgrado; 2014.




Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Traspl. 2021;10