medigraphic.com

2021, Number 3

<< Back

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2021; 24 (3)

Relational responsibility in systemicdialogical therapy

Desatnik MO

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 1291-1308
PDF size: 331.22 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The intention of this article is to propose an ethical position in the personal relationships, in the context of psychotherapeutic processes, between therapists and consultants as well as in the therapeutic training, from the perspective of systemic-dialogical therapy. This approach implies relational responsibility, that has to attend reflexion about the therapists’ positioning, focus on their emotions and stand according with them. It is important to distinguish different ways of relating with significant others, in a conformational way. It is relevant to analyze contexts and their problems, to approach significant others, discuss uncertainty, excessive focusing on techniques and efficiency of therapy, change dilemmas. We propose ti stimulate conversations and dialogue, that consider power relationships and gender perspective, diversity and complexity, plurality of persons and contexts, multiple reality constructions, to reach relational responsibility and ethical stance in clinical contexts.


REFERENCES

  1. Bertrando, P. (2011). El terapeuta dialógico: El diálogo que conmueve y transforma. México: Pax.

  2. Bertrando, P. (2015). Emotions and the therapist: a systemic-dialogical approach. London:Karnak Books.

  3. Bertrando, P. (2016). Terapia sistémica y perspectiva dialógica, una posible integración. Revista sistemas familiares y otros sistemas humanos. Año 32, No 2, 5-12.

  4. Buber, M. (1992). ¿Qué es el hombre? México: FCE.

  5. Desatnik, O. y Franklin, A. (2017). Intimidad en la Psicoterapia. Tesis para obtener el grado de Maestría en Terapia Familiar. México: ILEF.

  6. Fruggeri, L. (1996). El proceso terapéutico como construcción social del cambio. En Sh. McNamme y K. J. Gergen (1996). La terapia como construcción social. España: Paidos Cap. 3, 61 – 74.

  7. Gergen, K. (2005). La comunicación terapéutica como relación. Sistemas Familiares, 21, (1-2), 119-135.

  8. Hosking, D.M. y Pluut, B. (2010). (Re) constructing Reflexivity: A relational constructionist approach. The Qualitative Report, Vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. 2010, 59-75.

  9. Ibáñez, J. (1994). El regreso del sujeto. México: Siglo XXI.

  10. Linni y Bertrando (en prensa). Situarse: posicionamiento y emociones en terapia sistémica. https://es.scribd.com/document/427637534/6

  11. McNamee, Sh. (2001). Recursos relacionales: la reconstrucción de la terapia y otras prácticas profesionales en el mundo posmoderno. Sistemas Familiares, Vol. 17, No. 2, 113-129.

  12. McNamee, Sh. (2009). Postmodern psychotherapeutic Ethics: Relational Responsibility in Practice. Human Systems: The Journal of Therapy Consultation yTraining. Vol. 20, No. 1, 57-71.

  13. Morin, E. (1990). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Barcelona: Gedisa.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com