Oviedo-Cruz H, Carrasco-Blancas ER, Cortes-Martínez MA

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 115-118
PDF size: 164.53 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract.

REFERENCES

1. Mendoza-Carrera CE, Acevedo-Gallegos S, M. L-M, Gallardo-Gaona JM and Copado-Mendoza DY. Comparación de cuatro tablas de crecimiento fetal para la predicción de desenlaces perinatales adversos en un hospital de tercer nivel de México. Ginecol Obstet México 2021;89:704-714.https://doi.org/10.24245/gom.v89i9.5817

2. Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, Gerds T, Gonen M, et al. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 2010;21:128-38.https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2

3. Hawass NE. Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients. Br J Radiol 1997;70:360-6.https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.70.832.9166071

4. Bandos AI, Rockette HE and Gur D. A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design. Acad Radiol 2005;12:291-7.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2004.08.013

5. Kim S and Lee W. Does McNemar's test compare the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic tests? Stat Methods Med Res 2017;26:142-154.https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280214541852

6. Trajman A and Luiz RR. McNemar chi2 test revisited: comparing sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic examinations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2008;68:77-80.https://doi.org/10.1080/00365510701666031

7. Yu Q, Tang W, Ma Y, Gamble SA and Tu XM. Comparing Multiple Sensitivities and Specificities with Different Diagnostic Criteria: Applications to Sexual Abuse and Sexual Health Research. Comput Stat Data Anal 2008;53:27-37.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2008.05.031

8. Hanley JA and McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-43.https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708

9. Bandos AI, Rockette HE and Gur D. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test. Acad Radiol 2006;13:414-20.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2005.12.012

10. Tang L, Du P and Wu C. Compare diagnostic tests using transformation-invariant smoothed ROC curves(). J Stat Plan Inference 2010;140:3540-3551.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2010.05.026

11. Blanche P, Dartigues JF and Riou J. A closed max-t test for multiple comparisons of areas under the ROC curve. Biometrics 2020;https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13401

12. Vergara IA, Norambuena T, Ferrada E, Slater AW and Melo F. StAR: a simple tool for the statistical comparison of ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:265.https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-265

13. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 2011;12:77.https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-77

14. Novoselova N, Della Beffa C, Wang J, Li J, Pessler F, et al. HUM calculator and HUM package for R: easy-to-use software tools for multicategory receiver operating characteristic analysis. Bioinformatics 2014;30:1635-6.https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu086

15. Zou GY and Yue L. Using confidence intervals to compare several correlated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves. Stat Med 2013;32:5077-5090.https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5889

16. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344-9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008

17. Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform 2014;48:193-204.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013