Fuente del CA, Castro GY, Yudovich BM, Canseco JJ

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 7-12
PDF size: 524.49 Kb.

ABSTRACT

In this paper the authors describe their experiences with the procedure of inducted bone generation or “bone distraction ”. Their experience: 176 patients with maximum followup of 5 6/12 years, an average bone distraction of 32mm. The procedure was realized on patients from 8/12 to 38 years of age. Bone distraction is a great resource for early reconstruction of craniofacial skeletal defects, eliminating the need of bone grafts, maxillo-mandibular fixation, and other more aggressive and complex procedures.

REFERENCES

1. Kaban LB, Moses MH, Mulliken JB. Surgical correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82: 9.

2. Lauritizen C, Munro IR. Classification and treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 19: 33.

3. Munro IR: One stage reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint in hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66: 699.

4. Ortiz Monasterio F, Fuente del Campo A: Early skeletal correction of hemifacial microsomia. En: Caronni EP, (editor). Craniofacial Surgery, 1985: 401-410.

5. Fuente del Campo A, Ortiz Monasterio F. Osteotomías maxilomandibulares para el tratamiento de la microsomía hemifacial. Anales Médicos 1988; 33: 55.

6. Fuente del Campo A, Psillakis J. Microsomia hemifacial. En: Texto de cirugía plástica y reconstructiva. Madrid: Ed. Ciffman. Masson- Salvat 1994.

7. Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthop 1983; 5: 1.

8. Converse JM, Horowitz SL, Coccaro PJ, Wood-Smith D. The corrective treatment of the skeletal asymmetry in hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 52: 221.

9. Prunzuaky S. Not all dwarfed mandibles are alike. Birth Defects 1969; 1: 120.

10. Murray JE, Mulliken JB, Kaban LB, et al. Twenty year experience in maxillocraniofacial surgery: an evaluation of early surgery on growth, function and body image. Ann Surg 1979; 190: 320.

11. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissue preservation Clin Orthop 1989; b: 239-263.

12. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 1989; b: 238-249.

13. Ilizarov GA, Devyatov AA, Kamerin VK. Plastic reconstruction of longitudinal bone defects by means of compression and subsequent distraction. Acta Chir. Plast., 1980; 22: 32-38.

14. 14.Aroson J. The biology of distraction osteogenesis. In: Chapman ME, (ed). Operative orthopaedics. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott. 1993a.

15. Synder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM, et al. Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973; 51: 506.

16. 16.Karp NS, Scherider JS, Thorne CH, McCarthy JG. Membranous bone lengthening. A serial histologic study. Plast Reconstr forum 1990; 13; 113.

17. 17.McCarthy JG, Scheider J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89: 1.

18. Ortiz Monasterio F, Molina F. Mandibular distraction in hemifacial microsomia. Operative techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 1: 105-111.

19. Fuente del Campo A, González Nieto P et al. Osteogénesis inducida en la mandíbula mediante el proceso de distracción ósea. Rev Anales Médicos: 1999; 5(2): 105-111.

20. Fuente del Campo A, Nieto González CP et al. Distracción osteog énica. Un nuevo horizonte en el tratamiento de los defectos de la mandíbula. Revista Colombiana de Cirugía plástica y Reconstructiva 1999; 5: 105-111.

21. Fuente del Campo A, Nieto González CP et al: Distracción ósea y osteogénesis inducida, experiencia en 112 casos de distracción mandibular. Cirugía Plástica Ibero-Latinoamericana 1999; 25(4): 291-301.