medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica Grupo Angeles

Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
    • Names and affiliations of the Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • About us
    • Data sharing policy
    • Stated aims and scope
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2022; 20 (2)

Experience with transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation as a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease

Gallo AB, Salazar HDL, Ruíz VFA, Gallo CB, Hidalgo VC, Andrade AB, Martínez DA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/104275

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/104275
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/104275

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 145-150
PDF size: 215.04 Kb.


Key words:

Hemorrhoidal disease, hemorrhoidal dearterialization, bleeding, prolapse, hemorrhoidal artery ligation.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Postoperative pain is the principal adverse effect of classic hemorrhoidectomy. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization has emerged as a new surgical technique for hemorrhoidal disease treatment, this technique can result in less postoperative pain, with recurrence no higher than classic hemorrhoidectomy. Material and methods: A retrospective study evaluating 62 patients operated with this technique in the Colorectal Department in Hospital Angeles León, with hemorrhoidal disease grades 2, 3, and 4; from 2014 to 2020. We used the commercial device (THD® Doppler). Results: Postoperative pain was evaluated 24 h and one week postop, we followed the patients for 12 months. With a success rate of 96.77% with a VAS of 2-3 (74%) at 24 h and 0-1 (82%) at one week. Conclusion: Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.


REFERENCES

  1. Ratto C, Campenni P, Papeo F, Donisi L, Litta F, Parello A. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for hemorrhoidal disease: a single-center study on 1000 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol. 2017; 21 (12): 953-962.

  2. Sandler RS, Peery AF. Rethinking What We Know About Hemorrhoids. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17 (1): 8-15.

  3. Ganz RA. The evaluation and treatment of hemorrhoids: a guide for the gastroenterologist. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 11 (6): 593-603.

  4. Lestar B, Penninckx F, Kerremans R. The composition of anal basal pressure. An in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989; 4 (2): 118-122.

  5. Xu L, Chen H, Gu Y. Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019; 29 (2): 75-81.

  6. Nelson DW, Champagne BJ, Rivadeneira DE, Davis BR, Maykel JA, Ross HM et al. Prophylactic antibiotics for hemorrhoidectomy: are they really needed? Dis Colon Rectum. 2014; 57 (3): 365-369.

  7. Ratto C, Parello A, Veronese E, Cudazzo E, D'Agostino E, Pagano C et al. Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for haemorrhoids: results from a multicentre trial. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 17 (1): O10-O19.

  8. Ratto C. THD Doppler procedure for hemorrhoids: the surgical technique. Tech Coloproctol. 2013; 18 (3): 291-298.

  9. Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009; 52 (9): 1665-1671.

  10. Ratto C, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto GB. Evaluation of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization as a minimally invasive therapeutic approach to hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010; 53 (5): 803-811.

  11. Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T. A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995; 90 (4): 610-613.

  12. Ratto C, de Parades V. Doppler-guided ligation of hemorrhoidal arteries with mucopexy: A technique for the future. J Visc Surg. 2015; 152 (2 Suppl): S15-S21.

  13. Rivadeneira DE, Steele SR, Ternent C, Chalasani S, Buie WD, Rafferty JL et al. Practice Parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised 2010). Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54 (9): 1059-1064.

  14. Leung ALH, Cheung TPP, Tung K, Tsang YP, Cheung H, Lau CW et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus tissue-selecting technique. Tech Coloproctol. 2017; 21 (9): 737-743.

  15. Tsunoda A, Takahashi T, Kusanagi H. A prospective randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus ultrasonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol. 2017; 21 (8): 657-665.

  16. Tsunoda A, Kiyasu Y, Fujii W, Kano N. Comparison of the early results of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and hemorrhoidectomy using an ultrasonic scalpel. Surg Today. 2014; 45 (2): 175-180.

  17. Felice G, Privitera A, Ellul E, Klaumann M. Doppler-Guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation: an alternative to hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48 (11): 2090-2093.

  18. Giarratano G, Toscana E, Toscana C, Petrella G, Shalaby M, Sileri P. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized study. Surg Innov. 2018; 25 (3): 236-241.

  19. Popov V, Yonkov A, Arabadzhieva E, Zhivkov E, Bonev S, Bulanov D et al. Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterilization versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for treatment of hemorrhoids-early and long-term postoperative results. BMC Surg. 2019; 19 (1): 4.

  20. Denoya P, Tam J, Bergamaschi R. Hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus hemorrhoidectomy: 3-year follow-up assessment of a randomized controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol. 2014; 18 (11): 1081-1085.

  21. Elmér SE, Nygren JO, Lenander CE. A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013; 56 (4): 484-490.

  22. De Nardi P, Capretti G, Corsaro A, Staudacher C. A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014; 57 (3): 348-353.

  23. Rorvik HD, Campos AH, Styr K, Ilum L, McKinstry GK, Brandstrup B et al. Minimal open hemorrhoidectomy versus transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020; 63 (5): 655-667.

  24. Figueiredo MN, Campos FG. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal dearterialization/transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: Technical evolution and outcomes after 20 years. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016; 8 (3): 232-237.

  25. Porrett LJ, Porrett JK, Ho YH. Documented complications of staple hemorrhoidopexy: a systematic review. Int Surg. 2015; 100 (1): 44-57.

  26. Festen S, van Hoogstraten MJ, van Geloven AA, Gerhards MF. Treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoidal disease with PPH or THD. A randomized trial on postoperative complications and short-term results. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009; 24 (12): 1401-1405.




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Table 1
Table 2

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med. 2022;20