medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2021, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2021; 35 (5)

History and development of hip arthroplasty: a vision of its successes, failures and teachings. (Part two)

Gómez-García F

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 440-452
PDF size: 552.32 Kb.


ABSTRACT

This is the second of two parts of the history and development of hip arthroplasty. In this part, a historical review of the development of contemporary hip alloarthroplasty is made. The purpose of this part is to give continuity to the first one where the first four periods were analyzed. This fifth part corresponds to the revision of its last stage that includes from 1970 to the present time. Comments are also made about our attitudes in the present and the route we envision towards the future.


REFERENCES

  1. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981; 52(2): 155-70.

  2. Long M, Rack HJ. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement--a materials science perspective. Biomaterials. 1998; 19(18): 1621-39. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00146-4

  3. Goldberg VM, Stevenson S, Feighan J, Davy D. Biology of grit-blasted titanium alloy implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (319): 122-9.

  4. Murr LE, Quinones SA, Gaytan SM, Lopez MI, Rodela A, Martinez EY, Hernandez DH, Martinez E, Medina F, Wicker RB. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V produced by rapid-layer manufacturing, for biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009; 2(1): 20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.05.004.

  5. The National Joint Registry of England and Wales 1018.

  6. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA. 2012; 17.

  7. Gómez-García F, Fernández-Fairén M., Espinoza-Mendoza RL. A proposal for the study of cementless short stems hip prostheses. Acta Ortop Mex. 2016; 30(4): 204-15.

  8. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993; 14(3): 231-42. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90146-2.

  9. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (235): 148-65.

  10. Gómez-García F, Robles-Uribe A. Antropomorfometría del fémur proximal en población mexicana: bases de diseño del vástago SLA. En: Artroplastía total de cadera. Edt. McGraw-Hill Interam. Capítulo 3, año 2000; 95-124.

  11. Collier JP, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE, Mayor MB. Corrosion at the interface of cobalt-alloy heads on titanium-alloy stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; (271): 305-12.

  12. Gilbert JL, Buckley CA, Jacobs JJ. In vivo corrosion of modular hip prosthesis components in mixed and similar metal combinations. The effect of crevice, stress, motion, and alloy coupling. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993; 27(12): 1533-44.

  13. Wolff J. The law of bone remodelling. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71031-5.

  14. Murray WR, Skinner HB. Constrained acetabular components. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 1994; 9(1): 14-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-5403(94)90133-3.

  15. Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Mont MA, Callaghan MA. Proceedings of the second international consensus meeting on musculoskeletal, infection. J of Arthoplasty. 2018; 34(2 S1): S-496., doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.038.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com