Rodríguez-Violante M, Abundes-Corona A, Cervantes-Arriaga A

Language: English
References: 6
Page: 39-41
PDF size: 125.54 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the delivery of healthcare to people with chronic diseases such as movement disorders. Movement disorders specialists were compelled to adapt to this unprecedented situation. The objective of this study is to assess this impact in terms of the reduction in the number of in-office consultations of a high-specialty fellowship program as a result of the pandemic restrictions, and to evaluate the overall satisfaction with the fellowship. Methods. Out-patient records of the Movement Disorders clinic from March 1st, 2020, to February 28th, 2021, were collected. Data from this period was compared to that from the previous eight years. A satisfaction survey along with a visual analog scale was applied to both the patients and the specialty fellows. Results. During the study period a total of 1,742 consultations were given, which represent a 60% drop in comparison to the previous year. Moreover, 38% of those consultations were carried out by telemedicine. Both fellows’ selfreported satisfaction and patient satisfaction with teleconsultation was high (90% and 96%, respectively. Conclusions. Despite the decrease of in-office visits, fellows reported an acceptable satisfaction regarding the learning objectives of the program and patient satisfaction was not compromised.

REFERENCES

1. Díaz-Bello S, Hernández-Hernández A, Guinto-Nishimura GY, Mondragón-Soto MG, Lem-Carrillo M, González-Aguilar A, et al. Reconversion of neurosurgical practice in times of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a narrative review of the literature and guideline implementation in a Mexican neurosurgical referral center. Neurosurg Focus. 2020; 49(6):E4. doi: 10.3171/2020.9.FOCUS20553

2. Hanson RE, Truesdell M, Stebbins GT, Weathers AL, Goetz CG. Telemedicine vs Office Visits in a Movement Disorders Clinic: Comparative Satisfaction of Physicians and Patients. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2019; 6(1):65-9. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12703

3. Klimek L, Bergmann KC, Biedermann T, Bousquet J, Hellings P, Jung K, et al. Visual analogue scales (VAS): Measuring instruments for the documentation of symptoms and therapy monitoring in cases of allergic rhinitis in everyday health care: Position Paper of the German Society of Allergology (AeDA) and the German Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), ENT Section, in collaboration with the working group on Clinical Immunology, Allergology and Environmental Medicine of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNOKHC). Allergo J Int. 2017; 26(1):16-24. doi: 10.1007/s40629-016-0006-7

4. Cuffaro L, Carvalho V, Di Liberto G, Klinglehoefer L, Sauerbier A, Garcia-Azorin D, et al. Neurology training and research in the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of the Resident and Research Fellow Section of the European Academy of Neurology. Eur J Neurol. 2020. doi: 10.1111/ene.14696. Epub ahead of print.

5. Esper CD, Scorr L, Papazian S, Bartholomew D, Esper GJ, Factor SA. Telemedicine in an Academic Movement Disorders Center during COVID-19. J Mov Disord. 2021. doi: 10.14802/jmd.20099. Epub ahead of print.

6. Suarez-Cedeno G, Pantelyat A, Mils K, Murthy M, Alshaikh J, Rosenthal L, et al. Movement Disorders Virtual Fellowship Training in Times of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Single-Center Experience. Telemed J E Health. 2021. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0419. Epub ahead of print.