medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica Grupo Angeles

Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
    • Names and affiliations of the Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • About us
    • Data sharing policy
    • Stated aims and scope
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2022; 20 (3)

Tracheal dimensions and their relationship with anthropometric measurements in the mexican population

Álvarez MAM, Torres RH, Ávila SPA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/105726

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/105726
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/105726

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 239-244
PDF size: 151.62 Kb.


Key words:

Tracheal length, tracheal dimensions, anthropometric measurements, mexican population.

ABSTRACT

Objective: Define the dimensions of the trachea through reconstructions by tomography and its correlation with anthropometric characteristics in the mexican population. Material and methods: Prospective, observational, and descriptive study in one year in a tertiary hospital in Mexico. Results: 100 patients were studied, 60 male and 40 female. In the total population, the mean tracheal length was 11.45. The mean tracheal length was 11.33 in males and 11.63 in females. The highest statistical correlation was between the tracheal length and the anteroposterior diameter of the carina of 0.420 (p = 0.000), followed by the tracheal length with the height of 0.347 (p = 0.000). In sex analysis, the highest correlation was between tracheal length and height of 0.367 (p = 0.004) and 0.334 (p = 0.035) in males and females respectively. Conclusions: There is a statistically significant correlation between tracheal length and height in our three study groups. Hence, knowledge of these measures and their statistical significance in our population may be useful to improve clinical practice and define actions in surgical pathology of the trachea. More comparative studies should be carried out to determine which measurement method has the lowest error rate.


REFERENCES

  1. Standring S, Ellis H, Healy JC, Johnson D, Williams A, Collins P. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 39rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2005.

  2. Begum T, Naushaba H, Alam J, Paul UK, Alim AJ, Akter J, et al. Cadaveric length of trachea in Bangladeshi adult male. Bangla J Anat. 2009; 7 (1): 42-44.

  3. Mehta S, Myat HM. The cross-sectional shape and circumference of the human trachea. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1984; 66 (5): 356-358.

  4. MacKenzie CF, McAslan TC, Shin B, Schellinger D, Helrich M. The shape of the human adult trachea. Anesthesiology. 1978; 49 (1): 48-50.

  5. Chunder R, Nandi S, Guha R, Satyanarayana N. A morphometric study of human trachea and principal bronchi in different age groups in both sexes and its clinical implications. Nepal Med Coll J. 2010; 12 (4): 207-214.

  6. Cámara Nacional de la Industria del Vestido. ¿Cuánto mide México? El tamaño sí importa. México. CANAIVE. 2012. Disponible en: https://movimientosalud.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/el-mexicano-promedio-mide-1-64-metros-y-pesa-74-kilos-estudio/

  7. Silva-Zolezzi I, Hidalgo-Miranda A, Estrada-Gil J, Fernandez-Lopez JC, Uribe-Figueroa L, Contreras A et al. Analysis of genomic diversity in mexican mestizo populations to develop genomic medicine in Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106 (21): 8611-8616.

  8. Grillo HC. Die chirurgie der trachea und bronchien. Chirurg. 1987; 58 (8): 511-520.

  9. Kamel KS, Lau G, Stringer MD. In vivo and in vitro morphometry of the human trachea. Clin Anat. 2009; 22 (5): 571-579.

  10. Mi W, Zhang C, Wang H, Cao J, Li C, Yang L et al. Measurement and analysis of the tracheobronchial tree in Chinese population using computed tomography. PLoS One. 2015; 10 (4): e0123177.

  11. Griscom NT, Wohl ME. Dimensions of the growing trachea related to age and gender. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986; 146 (2): 233-237.

  12. Griscom NT, Wohl ME, Fenton T. Dimensions of the trachea to age 6 years related to height. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1989; 6 (3): 186-190.

  13. Nawshin N, Mannan S, Begum M, Kamal MF, Khatun S, Faysal AA et al. Variation of length of trachea in different age and sex group of Bangladeshi cadaver. Mymensingh Med J. 2016; 25 (4): 607-610.

  14. Robert L, Robert AM, Fulop T. Rapid increase in human life expectancy: will it soon be limited by the aging of elastin? Biogerontology. 2008; 9 (2): 119-133.

  15. Cinar U, Halezeroglu S, Okur E, Akif Inanici M, Kayaoglu S. Tracheal length in adult human: the results of 100 autopsies. Int J Morphol. 2016; 34 (1): 232-236.

  16. Munguía-Canales DA, Ruiz-Flores J, Vargas-Mendoza GK, Morales-Gómez J, Méndez-Ramírez I, Murata C. Tracheal dimensions in the mexican population. Cir Cir. 2011; 79 (6): 505-510.

  17. Fearon B, Whalen JS. Tracheal dimensions in the living infant (preliminary report). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1967; 76 (5): 965-974.




Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med. 2022;20