medigraphic.com

2021, Number 1

Next >>

Rev Clin Esc Med 2021; 11 (1)

Anatomía quirúrgica del trasplante renal: ejemplificando la incorporación de la anatomía en las ciencias no médicas

Redondo-Sáenz D, Cortés-Salas C

Language: Spanish
References: 61
Page:
PDF size: 204.33 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Anatomy is of vital importance in health sciences. Although its centrality is demonstrated in disciplines such as Medicine, in others such as Nursing it remains doubtful as its importance tries to be explained through subjects of interest aside from the correspondent disciplinary focus. The current bibliographic review aims to exemplify the importance of this discipline in Nursing by describing the surgical anatomy of renal transplant and its relationship with the most prevalent nursing diagnoses in this period. The problem-based learning methodology allowed to understand the updates in the anatomical bases of renal transplant’s surgical technique and its influence in the nursing diagnoses present before, during, and after surgery. It is concluded that anatomy constitutes a science of vital importance for the education and practice of all health sciences, while it exists a bidirectional feedback between morphological sciences and Nursing.


REFERENCES

  1. Kondrashov P, McDaniel DJ, Jordan RM.Premedical anatomy experience and studentperformance in medical gross anatomy. Clin Anat. 2017;30(3):303-311. https://doi org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1002/ca.22846

  2. Moxham BJ, Emmanouil-Nikoloussi E,Standley H, et al. The attitudes of medical studentsin Europe toward the clinical importance ofembryology. Clin Anat. 2016;29(2):144-150. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1002/ca.22667

  3. Moxham BJ, Emmanouil-Nikoloussi E, BrennerE, et al. The attitudes of medical students in Europetoward the clinical importance of histology. ClinAnat. 2017;30(5):635-643. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1002/ca.2288

  4. 4 . Rueda-Esteban RJ, Pedraza-Rodríguez JD,Ramírez DP, Perdomo F. Spontaneous Splenic RuptureCase Report: an Approach to Anatomy Importancefor Radiological Correlation. FASEB J. 2020;34(51):1-1.https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.07266

  5. 5 . Clifton W, Damon A, Nottmeier E, PichelmannM. The importance of teaching clinical anatomy insurgical skills education: Spare the patient, use a sim!Clin Anat. 2020;33(1):124-127.

  6. 6 . Ahmad K, Khaleeq T, Hanif U, Ahmad N.Addressing the failures of undergraduate anatomyeducation: Dissecting the issue and innovating asolution. Ann Med Surg. 2021;61:81-84.

  7. Bakon S, Craft J, Christensen M, WirihanaL. Can active learning principles be applied to thebioscience assessments of nursing students? A reviewof the literature. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;37:123-127.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.030

  8. McVicar A, Andrew S, Ross K. The ‘bioscienceproblem’ for nursing students: An integrative reviewof published evaluations of Year 1 bioscience, andproposed directions for curriculum development.Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(3):500-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.003

  9. Andrew S, McVicar A, Zanganeh M,Henderson N. Self efficacy and relevance of biosciencefor nursing, midwifery and healthcare students. JClin Nurs. 2015;24(19-20):2965-2972. https://doiorg.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/jocn.12933

  10. 10 Taylor V, Ashelford S, Fell P,Goacher PJ. Biosciences in nurse education: is thecurriculum fit for practice? Lecturers’ views andrecommendations from across the UK. J Clin Nurs.2015;24(19-20):2797-2806. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/jocn.12880

  11. 11 Fell PL, Dobbins K, Dee P. Biosciencelearning in clinical placement: the experiences ofpre‐registration nursing students. J Clin Nurs.2016;25(17-18):2694-2705. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/jocn.13097

  12. Connolly SA, Gillingwater TH,Chandler C, et al. The Anatomical Society’s coreanatomy syllabus for undergraduate nursing. J Anat.2018;232(5):721-728. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/joa.12782

  13. Schaefer AF, Wilson AB, Barger JB,Azim HM, Brokaw JJ, Brooks WS. What Does aModern Anatomist Look like? Current Trends inthe Training of Anatomy Educators. Anat Sci Educ.2019;12(3):225-235. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1002/ase.1806

  14. Chia TI, Oyeniran OI. Determiningthe anatomy of anatomy educators. J Taibah Univ MedSci. 2020;15(2):102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.03.001

  15. O’Keeffe GW, Davy S, Barry DS.Radiologist’s views on anatomical knowledgeamongst junior doctors and the teaching of anatomyin medical curricula. Ann Anat. 2019;223:70-76.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2019.01.011

  16. Sadler TJ, Zhang T, Taylor HL, BrassetC. The role of radiology in anatomy teaching in UKmedical schools: a national survey. Clin Radiol.2018;73(2):185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.08.008

  17. Zhang J, Zilundu PLM, Zhou L, GuoG. Supplementary Regional Anatomy Teaching bySurgeons Enhances Medical Students Mastery ofAnatomical Knowledge and Positively Impacts TheirChoice of Future Career. J Surg Educ. 2020;77(5):1113-1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.016

  18. Beedholm K, Frederiksen K. Theprocess of Danish nurses’ professionalization andpatterns of thought in the 20th century. Nurs Inq.2015;22(2):178-187. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/nin.12079

  19. Fawcett TN, Waugh A, Smith GD.Editorial: The primacy of the biosciences: a forgottenpriority in nurse education? J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(17-18):2680-2682. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/jocn.13484

  20. Jensen KT, Knutstad U, Fawcett TN.The challenge of the biosciences in nurse education:A literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(9-10):1793-1802. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/jocn.14358

  21. Román-Bautista TE, Martínez-Montaño M del LC, Campos-Méndez M, Cortés-Riverol JGR, Rosales de Gante S, Arévalo-RamírezM.Estrategia de aprendizaje basado en problemasen la asignatura de Anatomía de la licenciatura enMedicina.Rev Iberoam para la Investig y el DesarroEduc. 2019;9(18):557-581. https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v9i18.436

  22. Hernández-Huaripaucar EM, Yallico-Calmett RM. El Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas(ABP) como estrategia didáctica innovadora en laenseñanza de la Anatomía Humana. Horiz la Cienc.2020;10(19):165-177. https://doi.org/10.26490/uncp.horizonteciencia.2020.19.595

  23. Miranda-Chacón Z. Enseñanza dela Anatomía con base en el enfoque de AprendizajeBasado en Problemas mediante casos clínicos. RevActual Investig en Educ. 2017;17(1):1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/aie.v17i1.27453

  24. Johnston S, Vaughan B. We needone more hour solely based on anatomy… Give usanatomy!’: Early-year learner perceptions of anatomywithin an integrated & case-based learning osteopathycurriculum. Int J Osteopath Med. 2020;36:49-54.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2020.02.001

  25. Fernández-Naranjo A, Gómez-Padrón EI, Rivera-Michelena N. Propuesta de unaestrategia metodológica para el aprendizaje de laanatomía basado en los problemas de salud. RevHabanera Ciencias Médicas. 2002;1(1):16-23. http://www.revhabanera.sld.cu/index.php/rhab/article/view/583

  26. Cueto-Manzano AM. La SociedadLatinoamericana de Nefrología e Hipertensión ylos retos de la enfermedad renal crónica en nuestraregión. Nefrol Latinoam. 2019;16:13-19. doi.org/10.24875/NEFRO.18000053doi.org/10.24875/NEFRO.18000053

  27. González-Bedat MC, Rosa-Diez G,Ferreiro A. El Registro Latinoamericano de Diálisisy Trasplante Renal: la importancia del desarrollo delos registros nacionales en Latinoamérica. NefrolLatinoam. 2017;14(1):12-21. doi.org/10.1016/j.nefrol.2016.12.002

  28. García-Trabanino R, Hernández C,Rosa A, Domínguez-Alonso J. Incidencia, mortalidady prevalencia de enfermedad renal crónica terminalen la región del Bajo Lempa, El Salvador: 10 años deregistro comunitario. Nefrología. 2016;36(5):517-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2016.03.018

  29. Blázquez-Alcázar JD, Arriola-Hernández M, Nieto-Rojas I, Bautista-Oropesiano M,Alonso-Moreno J, Orueta-Sánchez R. Seguimientode la función renal y factores que influyen en suevolución en una cohorte de personas de 65 a 74años de edad. Rev Clínica Med Fam. 2020;13(2):116-122. https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1699-695X2020000200003

  30. Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, etal. Global, regional, and national burden of chronickidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis forthe Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet.2020;395(10225):709-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3

  31. Rivera-Chavarría A, Méndez-Chacón E. Mortalidad y egresos hospitalariospor enfermedad renal crónica compatibles conenfermedad crónica de causas no tradicionales,Costa Rica. Acta Med Costarric. 2016;58(1):4-14.https://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-60022016000100001

  32. Tinoco JD de S, Nunes de Paiva M dasGM, Frazao CM, Dias Fernandes MI da C, EndersBC, De Carvalho Lira ALB. Ineffective Protectionin Hemodialysis Patients: Sociodemographic andClinical Context. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2018;29(4):227-233. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/2047-3095.12181

  33. Frazao CM, Dantas J, Nunes de PaivaM das GM, De Carvalho Lira ALB, De OliveiraLopes MV, Enders BC. Association BetweenNursing Diagnoses and Socioeconomic/ClinicalCharacteristics of Patients on Hemodialysis. IntNurs Knowl. 2015;26(3):135-140. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/2047-3095.12051

  34. Lukasewicz Ferreira SA, EcherIC, Lucena A de F. Nursing Diagnoses AmongKidney Transplant Recipients: EvidenceFrom Clinical Practice. Int J Nurs Knowl.2014;25(1):49-53. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/2047-3095.12006

  35. Koken ZO, Karahan S, Tuncbilek Z,Celik SS. Nursing Diagnoses and Interventions inKidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Study.Transplant Proc. 2019;51(7):2321-2323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.03.047

  36. Moore KL, Agur AMR, Dalley AF.Anatomía Con Orientación Clínica. 8 ed. LippincottWilliams & Wilkins; 2017.

  37. Ferrante MS, Algieri RD, FernándezJP, Flores CA, Vassia GM. Bases anatómicas delcontrol vascular del pedículo renal. Rev ArgentinaAnatomía Online. 2016;7(1):8-12. https://www.revista-anatomia.com.ar/archivos-parciales/2016-1-revista-argentina-de-anatomia-online-a.pdf

  38. Dogan SM, Dogan G, Simsek C,et al. Transplantation Using Renal Grafts WithMultiple Renal Arteries: A Putative Study on theImpact of Arterial Reconstruction Technique andSite of Implantation on Outcomes. TransplantProc. 2021;53(3):920-926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.024

  39. Sevmis M, Demir ME, MerhametsizO, Aktas S, Sevmis S, Uyar M. Grafts With MultipleRenal Arteries in Kidney Transplantation. TransplantProc. 2021;53(3):933-940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.07.019

  40. Skandalakis JE, Colborn GL, WeidmanTA, et al. Cirugía. Bases de La Anatomía Quirúrgica.Marban; 2015.

  41. Nakamura Y, Dan K, Miki K,Yokoyama T, Tanaka K, Ishii Y. Safe and effectiveelongation of a short graft and multiple renal veinsusing the gonadal vein (cylindrical technique) inliving donor kidney transplantation. TransplantReports. 2020;5(3):100047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpr.2020.100047

  42. Tatarano S, Enokida H, YamadaAnatomical Variations of the Left Renal Vein DuringLaparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy. Transplant Proc.2019;51(5):1311-1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.132

  43. Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, BilliarTR, et al. Schwartz. Principios de Cirugía. 10 ed.McGraw-Hill; 2015.

  44. Sevmis M, Kilercik H, Aktas S, AlkaraU, Demir ME, Sevmis S. Results of Haberal’s Corner-Saving Ureteral Anastomosis Technique for RenalTransplantation: A Retrospective Study. TransplantProc. 2021;53(3):814-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.10.019

  45. Wang H, Chen R, Li T, Peng L.Robotassisted laparoscopic vs laparoscopic donornephrectomy in renal transplantation: A metaanalysis. Clin Transplant. 2019;33(1):e13451. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/ctr.13451

  46. 46 Bruyère F, Pradère B, Faivre d’Arcier B,Boutin J-M, Buchler M, Brichart N. Robot-assistedrenal transplantation using the retroperitonealapproach (RART) with more than one year followup: Description of the technique and results. Progrèsen Urol. 2018;28(1):48-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2017.10.002

  47. Favi E, Iesari S, Catarsini N, et al.Outcomes and surgical complications following livingdonor renal transplantation using kidneys retrievedwith trans‐peritoneal or retro‐peritoneal handassisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. Clin Transplant.2020;34(12):e14113. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/ctr.14113

  48. Li B, Liu DB, Gong EM. Robotassistedlaparoscopic transplant-to-nativeureteroureterostomy of an intraperitoneal renalallograft. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(4):356-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.06.008

  49. Lu T, Yi SG, Bismuth J, Knight RJ,Gaber AO, Bechara CF. Short and midterm resultsfor internal jugular vein extension for short rightrenal vein kidney transplant. Clin Transplant.2018;32(8):e13312. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/ctr.13312

  50. Foster JG, Foster KJ. Care of theRenal Transplant Patient. Prim Care Clin Off Pract.2020;47(4):703-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2020.08.007

  51. Lerman M, Mulloy M, Gooden C,et al. Post transplant renal vein thrombosis, withsuccessful thrombectomy and review of the literature.Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;61:291-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.07.066

  52. Aghayev A, Memon AA, Zheng S,Menard M, Siedlecki AM. Transplant renal arteryand vein occlusion evaluated with ferumoxytolenhancedmagnetic resonance angiography. ClinImaging. 2021;77:142-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.02.022

  53. Craig-Schapiro R, Nejim B,Arhuidese I, Malas MB. Aggressive infrainguinalrevascularization in renal transplant patients isjustifiable. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(7):1718-1725.https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/ajt.14636

  54. Turshudzhyan A. Post-renaltransplant malignancies: Opportunities forprevention and early screening. Cancer Treat ResCommun. 2021;26:100283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100283

  55. Panuccio V, Tripepi R, Bellantoni M,et al. Pruritus and quality of life in renal transplantpatients. Clin Transplant. 2017;31(3):e12893. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/ctr.12893

  56. Brar A, Gruessner A, Adey D, et al.Association of Physical Function and Survival inOlder-Adult Renal Transplant Recipients. TransplantProc. 2021;53:913-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.038

  57. Hollyer I, Ison MG. The challenge ofurinary tract infections in renal transplant recipients.Transpl Infect Dis. 2018;20(2):e12828. https://doiorg.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/tid.12828

  58. Basic-Jukic N, Juric I, Furic-CunkoV, Kastelan Z. Central nervous system infectionsin renal transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis.2020;22(4):e13341. https://doi-org.ezproxy.sibdi.ucr.ac.cr/10.1111/tid.13341

  59. Krishnamoorthy S, Kumaresan N,Zumla A. Latent tuberculosis infection and renaltransplantation – Diagnosis and management.Int J Infect Dis. 2019;80:S73-S76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2019.01.049

  60. Pagès-Puidgemont N, Valverde-Merino MI. Métodos para medir la adherenciaterapeútica. Ars Pharm. 2018;59(3):163-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.30827/ars.v59i3.7387

  61. Wilson AB, Notebaert AJ, Schaefer AF,et al. A Look at the Anatomy Educator Job Market:Anatomists Remain in Short Supply. Anat Sci Educ.2020; 13(1): 91-101. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1895.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com