medigraphic.com

2020, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Colombiana de Bioética 2020; 15 (1)

Between Symptom and Pharmakon. Bernard Stiegler’s Organology of Morality

Vignola P

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page:
PDF size: 167.60 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Purpose/Context. This article explores Bernard Stiegler’s philosophy of technics, focusing on the moral dimension of the pharmacological perspective. Its purpose is motivated by the bioethical questions arising from the Stieglerian standpoint, particularly the phenomena of addictions to digital technology and the social and cognitive effects of the multimedia context.
Method/Approach. The methodological approach is Stiegler’s pharmacological perspective, whereby we can rethink the bases of ethics and morals in the digital realm.
Results/Findings. It makes a theoretical contribution to the debate on the adverse effects and benefits of adopting digital technology for all knowledge domains and social relationships, emphasizing attention disorders and symptoms of psychosocial distress.
Discussion/Conclusions/Contributions. It provides useful elements for a methodological rapproachement between the philosophy of technology and bioethics (from pharmacology and organology). Thus, the research and analysis of the Stieglerian corpus clarify the bioethical proposals that coexist from the pharmacological perspective.


REFERENCES

  1. Bailly, Francis, y Giuseppe Longo. 2009. “Biological Organization and Anti-Entropy.”Journal of Biological Systems 17, no. 1: 63–96. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218339009002715

  2. Brehier, Émile. 1928. La Théorie des incorporels dans l´ancien stoicisme. Paris: Vrin.

  3. Cortés Lagunas, Nadia K. 2013. “Escritura y fármakon. Entrevista a Bernard Stiegler.”Escritura e imagen 9: 325-337. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ESIM/article/view/43874

  4. Crary, Jonathan. 2013. 24/7. Late Capitalism and the End of Sleep. New York: Verso.

  5. Deleuze, Guilles. 2005. Lógica del sentido. Barcelona: Paidós

  6. Deleuze, Guilles. 1996. Crítica y clínica. Barcelona: Anagrama.

  7. Derrida, Jacques. 1971. De la gramatología. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI

  8. Derrida, Jacques. 1989. Márgenes de la filosofía. Madrid: Cátedra.

  9. Derrida, Jacques. 1997. La diseminación. Madrid: Espiral.

  10. Hayles, Katherine. 2007. “On Hyper and Deep Attention: The Generational Dividein Cognitive Modes.” Profession: 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1632/prof.2007.2007.1.187

  11. Huy, Yuk, y Harry Halpin. 2013. “Collective individuation. The Future of the SocialWeb.” En Unlike Us Reader. Social Media Monopolies and Their Alternatives,editado por Geert Lovink and Miriam Rasch, 103-116. Amsterdam: Institutefor Network Culture.

  12. Lotka, Alfred. J. 1945. “The Law of Evolution as a Maximal Principle.” Human Biology17, no. 3: 167–194. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41447607

  13. Moore, Gerald. 2018. “The Pharmacology of Addiction.” Parrhesia, no. 29: 190-211.

  14. Moreno, Jacob Levy. 1951. Sociometry, Experimental Method and the Science of Society.An Approach to a New Political Orientation. New York: Beacon House.

  15. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1968. Will to Power. New York: Random.

  16. Ross, Daniel. 2015. ‘Touch/Screen.” La Deleuziana. Online Journal of Philosophy, no.2: 149-165.

  17. Rouvroy, Antoinette, y Thomas Berns. 2016. “Gubernamentalidad algorítmica yperspectivas de emancipación ¿La disparidad como condición de individuacióna través de la relación?” Adenda Filosófica, no. 1. pp. 88-116.

  18. Somondon, Gilbert. 2005. L’Individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information.Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.

  19. Stiegler, Bernard. 2002. La Técnica y el Tiempo I. El pecado de Epimeteo. Hondarribia:Cultura Libre.

  20. Stiegler, Bernard. 2008. Prendre soin. De la jeunesse et des générations. Paris: Galilée.

  21. Stiegler, Bernard. 2010. Ce qui fait que la vie vaut la peine d’être vecue. De la pharmacologie.Paris: Flammarion.

  22. Stiegler, Bernard. 2013. Pharmacologie du front National. Paris: Flammarion.

  23. Stiegler, Bernard. 2015. La société automatique I. L’avenir du travail. Paris: Fayard.

  24. Stiegler, Bernard. 2018. Qu’appelle-t-on penser? L’immense regresión. Paris: Liens quilibèrent.

  25. Wambacq, Judith, Daniel Ross, y Bart Buseyne. 2016. “‘We Have to Become the Quasi-cause of Nothing – of Nihil’: An Interview with Bernard Stiegler.” Theory, Culture& Society 35, no. 2: 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0263276416651932




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com