medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Pública de México

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2022; 64 (4)

Study of quality of life in family caregivers of people with intellectual disabilities

Leyva-López A, Rivera-Rivera L, Márquez-Caraveo ME, Toledano-Toledano F, Saldaña-Medina C, Chavarría-Guzmán K, Delgado-Gallegos JL, Katz-Guss G, Lazcano-Ponce E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 38
Page: 397-405
PDF size: 374.08 Kb.


Key words:

quality of life, caregivers, intellectual disability, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To explore the experiences and perceptions of quality of life (QoL) in family caregivers (FC) of people with intellectual disabilities (PID) in Morelos and Sinaloa, Mexico. Materials and methods. Qualitative study. Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted in FC of PID who attended basic public schools in Huitzilac, Morelos, and Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico. Content analysis was performed with the support of the ATLAS.ti.8.0 program. Results. FC experience an affectation of their CV in different dimensions: emotional, physical and material well-being, personal development, self-determination and interpersonal relationships. The empathy and support generated with other FC make them feel good and relieve them of activities for short time lapses, reducing the load of care of PID. Conclusions. Caring for an PID can negatively affect the QoL of CF. It is suggested to develop and implement programs for care, support, and comprehensive guidance; likewise, create and strengthen mutual help groups with other caregivers.


REFERENCES

  1. Schalock RL, Luckasson R, Tassé MJ. An Overview of intellectualdisability: definition, diagnosis, classification, and systems of supports(12th ed.). Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2021;126(6):439-42. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-126.6.439

  2. Oti-Boadi M. Exploring the lived experiences of mothers of childrenwith intellectual disability in Ghana. SAGE Open. 2017;7:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017745578

  3. Maulik PK, Mascarenhas MN, Mathers CD, Dua T, Saxena S. Prevalenceof intellectual disability: A meta-analysis of population-based studies. ResDev Disabil. 2011;32(2):419-36.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.018

  4. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Encuesta Nacional dela Dinámica Demográfica (ENADID) 2018. México: Inegi, 2019 [citadofeb 15, 2020]. Disponible en: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enadid/2018/

  5. Verdugo-Alonso MA, Schalock RL, Gómez SL. El modelo de calidad devida y apoyos: la unión tras veinticinco años de caminos paralelos. SigloCero Rev Española Discap Intel. 2021;52(3):9-28. https://doi.org/10.14201/scero2021523928

  6. Morisse F, Vandemaele E, Claes C, Claes L, Vandevelde S. Qualityof life in persons with intellectual disabilities and mental health problems:an explorative study. Sci World J. 2013;2013:491918. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/491918

  7. Yoong A, Koritsas S. The impact of caring for adults with intellectualdisability on the quality of life of parents. J Intellect Disabil Res.2012;56(6):609-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01501.x

  8. Verdugo-Alonso MA, Schalock R, Arias B, Gómez L, de Urríes-Borja J.Capítulo 19. Calidad de vida. En Discapacidad e inclusión: Manual para ladocencia. Salamanca, España: Amarú, 2013: 443-61 [citado ene 15, 2019].Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283211086_Calidad_de_Vida?msclkid=7b0bfb0ac67d11ec9621cec119a46085/

  9. Verdugo MA, Crespo M, Nieto T, coords. Aplicación del paradigmade calidad de vida: VII Seminario de Actualización Metodológica enInvestigación sobre Discapacidad SAID, 2010. Salamanca, España: INICO,2010 [citado feb 16, 2019]. Disponible en: https://sid.usal.es/idocs/F8/FDO24653/Actas6.pdf

  10. WHOQOL Group. Study protocol for the World Health Organizationproject to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL).Qual Life Res. 1993;2:153-9 [citado ene 18, 2020]. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00435734

  11. García-Calvente MM, Mateo-Rodríguez I, Eguiguren AP. El sistema informalde cuidados en clave de desigualdad. Gac Sanit. 2004;18(4):132-39[citado ene 18, 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/gs/2004.v18suppl1/132-139/es

  12. Toledano-Toledano F, Luna D. The psychosocial profile of family caregiversof children with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study. BiopsychosocMed. 2020;14:29:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-020-00201-y

  13. Toledano-Toledano F, Contreras-Valdez JA. Validity and reliability of theBeck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) in family caregivers of children withchronic diseases. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206917

  14. Fernández-Ávalos MI, Pérez-Marfil MN, Ferrer-Cascales R, Cruz-Quintana F, Clement-Carbonell V, Fernández-Alcántara M. Quality oflife and concerns in parent caregivers of adult children diagnosed withintellectual disability: A qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health.2020;17(22):8690. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228690

  15. Dada S, Bastable K, Halder S. The role of social support in participationperspectives of caregivers of children with intellectual disabilities inIndia and South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6644.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186644

  16. Mathias K, Kermode M, San Sebastian M, Davar B, Goicolea I. Anasymmetric burden: Experiences of men and women as caregivers ofpeople with psychosocial disabilities in rural North India. Transcult Psy.2019;56(1):76-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461518792728

  17. García KD, Quintero SM, Trespalacios SK, Fernández-Delgado MK.Sobrecarga y calidad de vida en cuidadores familiares de personas condiscapacidad intelectual. Gac Med Caracas. 2021;129(1):65-73. https://doi.org/10.47307/GMC.2021.129.1.9

  18. Mkabile S, Garrun KL, Shelton M, Swartz L. African families’ andcaregivers’ experiences of raising a child with intellectual disability: Anarrative synthesis of qualitative studies. Afr J Disabil. 2021;10:827. http://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v10i0.827

  19. Lin JD, Hu J, Yen CF, Hsu SW, Lin LP, Loh CH, et al. Quality of life incaregivers of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities: use ofWHOQOL-BREF survey. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30(6):1448-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.07.005

  20. Emerson E. Mothers of children and adolescents with intellectual disability:social and economic situation, mental health status, and the self-assessedsocial and psychological impact of the child’s difficulties. J Intellect Disabil Res.2003;47(4-5):385-99. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2788.2003.00498.X

  21. Heiman T. Parents of children with disabilities: resilience, coping, andfuture expectations. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2002;14(2):159-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015219514621

  22. Thompson-Janes E, Brice S, McElroy R, Abbott J, Ball J. Learning fromthe experts: a thematic analysis of parent’s experiences of attending atherapeutic group for parents of children with learning disabilities andchallenging behaviour. Br J Learn Disabil. 2014;44:95-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12115

  23. Van Hecke N, Claes C, Vanderplasschen W, De Maeyer J, De Witteen Stijn VN. Con-ceptualisation and measurement of quality of life basedon Schalock and Verdugo’s model: A cross-disciplinary review of theliterature. Soc Indic Res. 2018;137(1):335-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1596-2

  24. Cummins RA. Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. J IntellectDisabil Res. 2005;49(Pt 10):699-706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00738.x

  25. Wang M, Schalock RL, Verdugo MA, Jenaro C. Examining the factorstructure and hierarchical nature of the quality of life construct. Am JIntellect Dev Disabil. 2010;115(3):218-33. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-115.3.218

  26. Córdoba L, Henao CP, Verdugo-Alonso MA. Calidad de vida deadultos colombianos con discapacidad intelectual. Hacia Promoc Salud.2016;21(1):91-105. https://doi.org/10.17151/hpsal.2016.21.1.8

  27. Leyva-López A, Cupul-Uicab L, Melgar-Leyva O, Saldaña-Medina C,Piedragil-Galván I, Atrián-Salazar ML, et al. Trastornos del DesarrolloIntelectual: revisión de la literatura en México 1999-2020. Arch MedFam. 2021;23(1):45-57 [citado mar 15, 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/medfam/amf-2021/amf211e.pdf

  28. López-Márquez NM. Calidad de vida de cuidadores primarios depacientes con discapacidad dependiente, del CRIT Chihuahua, México.Tecnociencia Chihuahua. 2013;7(3):139-51 [citado ene 17, 2020].Disponible en: https://vocero.uach.mx/index.php/tecnociencia/article/view/656

  29. Vera-Padilla KA, Ruiz-Martínez AO. Calidad de vida de cuidadoresprimarios de niños con discapacidad intelectual. Rev Elect Psicol Iztacala.2017;20(4):1314-43 [citado dic 15, 2019]. Disponible en: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/repi/article/view/62803

  30. Lara-Cruz A, Ángeles-Llerenas Á, Katz-Guss G, Astudillo-GarcíaCI, Rangel-Eudave NG, Rivero-Rangel GM, et al. Conocimiento sobretrastornos del neurodesarrollo asociado con la aceptación del modelo deeducación inclusiva en docentes de educación básica. Salud Publica Mex.2020;62(5):569-81.https://doi.org/10.21149/11204

  31. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Encuesta Intercensal(2015). Panorama sociodemográfico de Sinaloa. México: Inegi, 2016 [citadoabr 20, 2020]. Disponible en: http://internet.contenidos.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/Productos/prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/nueva_estruc/inter_censal/panorama/702825082352.pdf

  32. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Encuesta Intercensal(2015). Panorama sociodemográfico de Morelos. México: Inegi, 2016[citado abr 20, 2020]. Disponible en: https://es.scribd.com/document/384444580/INEGI-Intercensal-2015-infografia-pdf

  33. Shettini P, Cortazzo I. Técnicas y estrategias en la investigación cualitativa.La Plata: Universidad Nacional de la Plata, 2016 [citado feb 15, 2019].Disponible en: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/10915/53686/Documento_completo__.-%20Cortazzo%20CATEDRA%20.pdf-PDFA.pdf?sequence=1

  34. Cáceres P. Análisis cualitativo de contenido: una alternativa metodológicaalcanzable. Psicoperspectivas. 2003;2(1):53-82. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol2-issue1-fulltext-3

  35. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitativeresearch (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19(6):349-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

  36. DiGirolamo AM, Salgado de Snyder VN. Women as primary caregiversin Mexico: challenges to well-being. Salud Publica Mex. 2008;50(6):516-22 [citado feb 20, 2020]. Disponible en: https://www.scielosp.org/article/spm/2008.v50n6/516-522/en/

  37. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Guía de bolsillo de la clasificaciónCIE-10: clasificación de los trastornos mentales y del comportamiento.Ginebra: Editorial Médica Panamericana, 2000 [citado ene 17, 2020].Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42326

  38. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Clasificación Internacional deEnfermedades, para Estadísticas de Mortalidad y Morbilidad (CIE-11).Ginebra: OMS, 2019 [citado feb 20, 2020]. Disponible en: https://icd.who.int/es/docs/Guia%20de%20Referencia%20(version%2014%20nov%202019).pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

salud publica mex. 2022;64