Guerra-Barbosa SE, Barbosa KJ, Barros-Rodrigues RC, Mitri-Sandoval AL, Castro L, Freitas-Valverde R, Pires RH

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 43-52
PDF size: 325.81 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: health education in Brazil is based on active methodologies, with contextualized learning. The adult brain learns with emotions (brain-based learning). In this scenario, learning based on clinical simulation and debriefing, carried out at its conclusion, play a fundamental role. Objective: this study proposes the translation and validation of the objective structured assessment of debriefing (OSAD) instrument into Portuguese to contribute to the training of simulation instructors to act in health education. Material and methods: the study consisted of three phases, namely: 1) reverse translation from Portuguese to English of the instrument into Portuguese with cultural adaptations; 2) evaluation by professors trained in clinical simulation, after translation and 3) evaluation of the translated OSAD after its application in a workshop specifically held. Results: the translation was based on the back translation with discussion of the authors and the translator; in the analysis by evaluators (judges) in the second phase (online forms) there were eighteen participants and in the third phase twelve, face-to-face, who validated the translated instrument through statistical analysis. Conclusion: the instrument will be useful to evaluate the debriefing, contributing to the improvement of health education.

REFERENCES

1. Davis A. The Credentials of Brain-Based Learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2004; 38 (1): 21-35.

2. Ausubel DP. The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1963.

3. Carvalho JAD, Carvalho MD, Barreto NAM, Alves FA. Andragogia: consideracoes sobre a aprendizagem do adulto. Ensino, Saude E Ambiente. 2010; 3 (1): 78-90.

4. Phrampus PE, O'Donnell JM. Debriefing using a structured and supported approach. In: Levine AI, DeMaria S, Schwartz AD, Sim AJ, editors. The comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2013. pp. 73-84.

5. Cheng A, Grant V, Auerbach M. Using simulation to improve patient safety: dawn of a new era. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169 (5): 419-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3817.

6. Arora S, Ahmed M, Paige J, Nestel D, Runnacles J, Hull L, et al. Objective structured assessment of debriefing: bringing science to the art of debriefing in surgery. Ann Surg. 2012; 256 (6): 982-988.

7. Brandao CFS, Collares CF, Marin HF. A simulacao realística como ferramenta educacional para estudantes de medicina. Sci Med. 2014; 24 (2): 187-192.

8. Dufrene C, Young A. Successful debriefing - best methods to achieve positive learning outcomes: a literature review. Nurse Educ Today. 2014; 34 (3): 372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.026.

9. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007; 2 (2): 115-125.

10. Quirós SM, Vargas MAO. Simulacao clínica: uma estratégia que articula práticas de ensino e pesquisa em enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enfermagem. 2014; 23 (4): 813-814.

11. Hernandéz-Nieto RA. Contributions to Statistical Analysis. Mérida: Universidad de Los Andes. 2002. pp. 119.

12. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007; 2 (2): 115-25. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539.