medigraphic.com
ISSN 2307-2113 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED)

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED) 2021; 32 (2)

Technological tools for the control and follow-up of patients with respiratory diseases and oxygen support

Naranjo RA, Arango AC, Cruz MFE

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 1-21
PDF size: 416.82 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The use of technological tools in health allows reaching geographical points where traditional medicine draws a gap between health institutions and patients. These technologies can reduce medical absence rates, increase adherence to treatment, and help ensure the appropriate frequency of medical visits. In the present work it was proposed to carry out a review of the literature on the control and followup in patients with oxygen and respiratory diseases through technological tools. A search was carried out in the databases Pubmed, Cochrane, Medline, Lilacs, Biomed, National Library, Science, with descriptors such as Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Descriptors in Health Sciences (DeCS). The analysis of the literature was carried out using the elements Strobe, Amstar. From the studies included in the final analysis, it can be evidenced that mobile health technology has become a very important tool in the monitoring and control of patients with respiratory diseases, which provides data in real time that They can be used to minimize complications and expand the opportunity for quality care in patients with respiratory problems, however, it is necessary to carry out clinical trials to determine the clinical benefits, when using technological tools in this area.


REFERENCES

  1. Dolado Martín C, Berlanga Fernández S, Fabrellas I, Padrés N, GalimanyMasclans J. Uso de aplicaciones móviles de salud en usuarios de AtenciónPrimaria. Rev Esp Enferm [Internet]. 2017 [acceso: 20/07/2020];40(2):16-21.Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/120514

  2. World Health Organization. mHealth - New horizons for health through mobiletechnologies, Global Observatory for eHealth series. Glob Obs eHealth Ser.2011;3:1.

  3. Ramírez L, Guillén E, Cifuentes Y. Estrategia de validación para aplicacionesmóviles de salud. Act Ingen. 2016;2:325-33.

  4. Marcin JP, Rimsza MR, Moskowitz WB. The Use of Telemedicine to AddressAccess and Physician Workforce Shortages. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):202-9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds. 2015-1253

  5. Arciniegas W, Bolívar F, Cano DJ. Evaluación de costos de un programa deoxigenoterapia domiciliaria. Rev Univers Industr Santand. Salud [Internet]. 2010[acceso: 20/07/2020];42(1):48-54. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=343835697006

  6. Ortega Ruiz F, Díaz Lobato S, Galdiz Iturri JB, García Río F, Güell Rous R,Morante Vélez F, et al. Continuous Home Oxygen Therapy. Arch Bronconeumol.Elservier. 2014;50(5):185–200.

  7. Marcano Belisario JS, Huckvale K, Greenfield G, Car J, Gunn LH.Smartphone and tablet self-management apps for asthma. Cochrane Database ofSystematic Reviews. 2013;11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010013.pub2

  8. Yang F, Wang Y, Yang C, Hu H, Xiong Z. Mobile health applications in selfmanagementof patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of their efficacy. BMC Pulm Med.2018;18(1):147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0671-z

  9. Milkowska J, Bialas A, Obrebski W, Gorski P, Piotrowski W. A pilot study ofdaily telemonitoring to predict acute exacerbation in chronic obstructivepulmonary disease. Internat J Med Informat. 2018;116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.013

  10. McCabe C, McCann M, Brady AM. Computer and mobile technologyinterventions for self‐management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Cochr Datab Systemat Reviews. 2017;5:CD011425. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2

  11. McLean S, Nurmatov U, Liu JLY, Pagliari C, Car J, Sheikh A. Telehealthcarefor chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochr Datab Systemat Reviews..2011;7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007718.pub2

  12. Cheng Q, Juen J, Hsu-Lumetta J, Schatz B. Predicting Transitions in OxygenSaturation Using Phone Sensors. Telemed J e-Health. 2016;22(2):132-7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2015.0040

  13. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC,Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool toassess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol[Internet]. 2007 [acceso: 20/07/2020];7(1). Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17302989/

  14. Vandenbroucke JP, Von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, PocockSJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M. Mejorar la comunicación de estudiosobservacionales en epidemiología (STROBE): explicación y elaboración. Gac Sanit[Internet]. 2009 [acceso: 20/07/2020];23(158):1-15. Disponible en:https://www.strobestatement.org/fileadmin/Strobe/uploads/translations/STROBE-Exp-SPANISH.pdf

  15. Marshall A, Medvedev O, Antonov A. Use of a smartphone for improved selfmanagementof pulmonary rehabilitation. Int J Telemed Appl. 2008;5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/753064

  16. Laso JC, León DX, Larriva D. Diseño de una aplicación móvil, enfocada afacilitar los cuidados especiales que deben tener los pacientes con enfermedadespulmonares restrictivas. Caso específico: Fibrosis pulmonar idiopática. Tesis deLicenciatura. Cuenca, Ecuador: Universidad del Azuay; 2016 [acceso:20/07/2020]. Disponible en: http://dspace.uazuay.edu.ec/handle/datos/5838

  17. Gómez GCA, Velasco MJ. Pulsioximetría y capnografía para dispositivosmóviles Android. Rev Ingen Bioméd. 2014;8(15):36-44. DOI:http:/dx.doi.org/10.14508/rbme.2014.8.15.36-44

  18. Hardinge M. Using a mobile health application to support self-management inchronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a six-month cohort study. BMC MedInformat Decis Mak. 2015;15:46. DOI: http:/dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0171-5

  19. Angarita Rodríguez DC, Castañeda Giaimo JN. Uso de dispositivos móviles enfisioterapia. Rev Cubana Inform Cienc Salud. 2017 [acceso: 20/07/2020];28(2).Disponible en: http://www.acimed.sld.cu/index.php/acimed/article/view/1064

  20. Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The Smartphone in Medicine: A review ofcurrent and potential use among physicians and students. J Med Internet Res.2012;14(5):e128. DOI: http:/dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1994

  21. Sleurs K, Seys SF, Bousquet J, Fokkens WJ, Gorris S, Pugin B, Hellings P.Mobile health tools for the management of chronic respiratory diseases. Allergy.2019;74:1292‐ 1306. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13720

  22. Arostegui I, Legarreta MJ, Barrio I, Esteban C, García-Gutiérrez S, Aguirre U,Quintana JM, IRYSS-COPD Group. A computer application to predict adverseevents in the short-term evolution of patients with exacerbation of chronicobstructive pulmonary disease. JMIR Med Inform. 2019;7(2):e10773. DOI:http:/dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.199410.2196/10773.

  23. Siddiqui T, Morshed BI. Severity classification of chronic obstructivepulmonary disease and asthma with heart rate and SpO2 sensors. EMBC.2018;2929-32.

  24. González M, Escalante HA. Pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructivacrónica de un programa de oxígeno domiciliario en Bogotá (2640m). Correlaciónentre la PaCO2 y la PaO2 con los valores de espirometría. Hospital Central PolicíaNacional (HOCEN). Rev Colomb Neumol. 2001;13(2):100-5.

  25. Caballero A, Torres-Duque CA, Jaramillo C, Bolívar F, Sanabria F, Osorio P, etal. Prevalence of COPD in five Colombian cities situated at low, medium, andhigh altitude (PREPOCOL study). Chest. 2008;133(2):343-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com