Villavicencio FR

Language: Spanish
References: 4
Page: 183-187
PDF size: 41.63 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The timing for coronary angiography and revascularization in unstable angina and infarction without Q-wave in patients without high-risk characteristics after arrival to the hospital is uncertain. If high-risk patients are not considered, there are several therapeutical strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of the patients. The first is a conservative approach, in which coronary angiography and revascularization is done only in patients presenting angina or electrocardiographic changes of ischemia after arrival to the hospital. The other one is an invasive approach, in which coronary angiography and revascularization procedure are done few days after arrival to the hospital. Several studies, in the last decade, have compared both types of therapeutical strategies in patients with unstable angina and infarction without Q-wave (TIMI IIIB, FRISC II and VANQWISH). The results of these studies were uncertain and showed that there are no advantages regarding mortality or infarction with either therapeutic approach. However, some subsets of patients benefited from the invasive approach (patients ≥ 65 years, angina or electrocardiographic changes in S-T segment during the time of hospitalization). On the other side, all these studies showed that with the invasive approach there is less incidence of recurrent ischemic events during the time of hospitalization and at long range, as well as an improvement in the functional class of ischemia, and in long-range quality of life as well as a marked reduction in hospital stay. In conclusion, an early invasive approach could be justified in patients with unstable angina presenting low and intermediate risk factors.

REFERENCES

1. The TIMI IIIB Investigators: Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Results of the TIMI IIIB trial. Thrombolysis in myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1994; 90: 1662.

2. FRISC II Investigators: Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronaryartery disease- FRISC II prospective randomized multicentre study. Lancet 1999; 354: 708-715.

3. BODEN WE, ROURKE RA, CRAWFORD MH, BLAUSTEIN AS, DEEDWANIA PC, ZOBLE RG, WEXLER LF, KLEIGER RE, PEPINE CJ, FERRY DR, CHOW BK, LAVORI PW: Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q wave myocardial infarctíon randomly assignes to an invasive as compared with- a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q wave myocardial Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH). N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1785-1792.

4. BRAUNWALD E, ANTMAN E, BEASLEY JW, CALIFF RM, CHEITLIN MD, HOCHMAN JS, JONES RH, KEREIAKES D, KUPERSMITH J, LEVIN TN, PEPINE CJ, SCHAEFFER JW, SMITH EE, STEWARD DE, THEROUX P: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and Non-STsegment elevation myocardial infarction: Executive summary and recommendations. Circulation 2000; 102: 1193-1209.