medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 5

<< Back

Rev ADM 2022; 79 (5)

Effective use of eighth generation adhesives.

Banegas F, Vintimilla S, Morales B, Pinos P
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/107965

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/107965
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/107965

Language: Spanish
References: 32
Page: 284-291
PDF size: 240.76 Kb.


Key words:

dental adhesives, dental adhesion, dental adhesive strength.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: a bibliographic review was carried out to learn about, analyze, and compare the different types of eighth-generation adhesives on the market and the difference between each one. Universal adhesives have demonstrated improvements in their resistance, especially in the application techniques and properties of these materials, improving the adhesive strength so that the dentist can provide successful restorative treatments. Objective: to know, analyze and compare the different types of eighth-generation adhesives used in dentistry. Material and methods: a search was made of the following electronic databases: PubMed, BVS, Redalyc, ScienceDirect. Finally, 32 articles that met the predetermined criteria and the specificity required for the research question were used. Conclusions: it was demonstrated that technology is advancing every day, especially in the area of adhesives since these are very useful in the daily life of the dentist. It is important to know each one of these since it is a little complex at the moment of selecting the correct one, but not the use. Currently, there are several options that the dentist can choose, which is why the professional must be trained on each of the various existing brands and according to the treatment which is the best to use at the time of rehabilitation. The dentist needs to know these materials since they will benefit him/her when carrying out a restorative treatment plan.


REFERENCES

  1. Parkin H. A new category of hygienist. Vital. 2012; 9: 4.

  2. Freedman G, Kaver A, Leinfelder K, Afrashtehfar KI. Dental adhesive systems: Seven generations of evolution. Dentista y Paciente. 2017; 110: 10-21.

  3. Baratieri LN. Odontología restauradora – fundamentos y técnicas. Sao Paulo, Brasil: Libraria Santos Editora; 2011. 1-349 p.

  4. Calatrava OLA. Actualización en odontología adhesiva y sellado inmediato dentinario (SID). Revisión de la literatura. Acta Odontológica Venezolana. 2018; 56 (2). Disponible en: https://www.actaodontologica.com/ediciones/2018/2/art-10/#

  5. Edelberg MH. Ionómeros vítreos y compómeros. En: Barrancos Mooney J, Barrancos PJ. Operatoria dental. Buenos Aires: Ed. Médica Panamericana; 2008. pp. 755-769.

  6. Mandri MN, Aguirre Grabre de Prieto A, Zamudio MA. Adhesive systems in restorative dentistry. Odontoestomatologia. 2015; 17 (26): 50-56.

  7. Garrofé A, Martucci DG, Picca M. Adhesión a tejidos dentarios. Rev Fac Odontol (Univ Buenos Aires). 2014; 29 (67): 5-13.

  8. Matos TP, Gutiérrez MF, Hanzen TA, Malaquias P, de Paula AM, de Souza JJ et al. 18-month clinical evaluation of a copper-containing universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Dent. 2019; 90: 103219.

  9. Flury S. Higienistas auxiliares. Quintessenz Team-Journal. 2012; 41: 595-600.

  10. Loguercio A, Reis A. Sistemas adhesivos. RODYB - Rev Oper Dent Biomater. 2006; 1 (2): 13-28.

  11. Silva J, Hoffmann O, Rossell R, Rodríguez D. Principios de adhesión dentinaria. ODOUS científica. 2015; 1-12.

  12. Te-Econom Plus. Ivoclar Vivadent. 2015. p. 1-6.

  13. Hervás García A, Martínez Lozano MA, Cabanes Vila J, Barjau Escribano A, Fos Galve P. Resinas compuestas: Revisión de los materiales e indicaciones clínicas. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006; 11 (2): 215-220.

  14. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017; 8 (1): 1-17.

  15. Savira F, Suharsono Y, Tamrat W, Pasimeni F, Pasimeni P, Kecerdasan I et al. Fortalecimiento de los servicios del laboratorio clínico. J Chem Inf Model. 2017; 21 (2): 1689-1699.

  16. Joseph P, Yadav C, Satheesh K, Rahna R. Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of sixth, seventh and eight generation bonding agents: an in vitro study. Int Res J Pharm. 2013; 4 (9): 143-147.

  17. Kakar S, Goswami M, Kanase A: Dentin bonding agents, I: complete classification-a review, World J Dent. 2011; 2 (4): 367-370.

  18. Vococid etching gel & etching liquid, Instructions for use. Voco. 2015; 1-8.

  19. Parra Lozada M, Garzón H. Self-etching adhesive systems, bond strength and nanofiltration: a review. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2012; 24 (1): 133-150.

  20. Thomas H. El adhesivo universal. Ivoclar Vivadent. 2016; 1: 1-40.

  21. Cabello TA. Efecto del pH de los sistemas adhesivos autoacondicionantes sobre las características adhesivas de resinas compuestas [Tesis]. Córdoba, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; 2015. 1-119 p.

  22. Bader Mattar M, Ibáñez Musalem M. Evaluación de la interfase adhesiva obtenida en restauraciones de resina compuesta realizadas con un sistema adhesivo universal utilizado con y sin grabado ácido previo. Rev Clin Periodoncia Implantol Rehabil Oral. 2014; 7 (3): 115-122.

  23. Camelo Solano DM, Díaz Arroyo E. Resistencia a las fuerzas de tracción del sistema de adhesión tradicional versus sistema de adhesión autograbable en la unión diente-bracket. Estudio in vitro [Tesis]. Cartagena, Colombia: Universidad de Cartagena; 2017. pp. 1-66.

  24. Lenchner NH. One coat bond. Forest Hills, Nueva York: Colténe; 2017. pp. 3-6.

  25. Kuraray N. CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick. Dent Advis. 2017; 1-28.

  26. Del Rosario Alvarez NM, Christiani JJ, Mandri MN. Efecto del blanqueamiento dentario sobre la adhesion a esmalte. Odontol Sanmarquina. 2021; 24 (1): 69-74.

  27. Stanpac. Catálogo de productos. MDC Dent. 2017; 1-52.

  28. VOCO. Futurabond DC 0482. Vol. 49. 2015. p. 1-2.

  29. Single Bond Universal. 3M ESPE. 2011. pp. 1-40.

  30. Ghaleb M, Orsini G, Putignano A, Dabbagh S, Haber G, Hardan L. The effect of different bleaching protocols, used with and without sodium ascorbate, on bond strength between composite and enamel. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13 (12): 2710.

  31. Freitas M, Diesel PG, Correa FG, Bernardi E, Fernandes Montagner A, Skupien JA et al. Reflections about adhesive systems. Int J Odontostomatol. 2010; 4 (1): 47-52.

  32. BISCO. Light-cured dental adhesive: instructions for use instructions for use. USA: 2018. pp. 1-4.




Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2022;79