medigraphic.com
ISSN 2395-8979 (Electronic)
CuidArte ”El Arte del Cuidado”

2022, Number 22

<< Back Next >>

CuidArte 2022; 11 (22)

Socio-ecological risk perception for type 2 diabetes in mexican adults

Jimenez-Tolentino KM, Armenta-Rodríguez I, Sánchez-Sánchez I, Ramírez-Girón N

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 35-43
PDF size: 118.47 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction. The risk of developing Type 2 diabetes is multifactorial; individual, family, social and contextual factors have been described that contribute to the onset of this disease and at increasingly younger ages. Objective. To describe the perception of socio-ecological risk for developing Type 2 diabetes in Mexican adults. Methodology. Cross-sectional descriptive design, the sample comprised 268 of Mexican adults between 18 and 59 years old, with prior informed consent. A sociodemographic data questionnaire and Sousa’s “Perception of risk to develop Type 2 Diabetes” instrument were applied. Results. The average age was 27.2±9.7, the educational level “bachelor’s degree” predominated with 57.1%. Regarding the perceived risk of developing Type 2 diabetes, 29.1% reported an acute perception and 59.3% a moderate perception. Age and the risk of suffering Type 2 Diabetes were significantly related, the higher the age, the higher the risk (r = .146; p = .05). Conclusion. The results are considered original, given that diabetes is usually analyzed from an individual approach, without considering social and contextual risk factors as contributing factors to the development of Type 2 Diabetes. Mexican adults have a moderate perception of risk for Type 2 diabetes..


REFERENCES

  1. Castro-Juárez C, Ramírez-García S, Villa-Ruano N, García-Cruz D. Epidemiología genética sobre las teorías causales yla patogénesis de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Gac Med Mex [Internet]. 2017 [acceso 9 noviembre 2020]; 153 (7): 864-874.DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/GMM.17003064

  2. Zheng Y, Sylvia HL, Frank BH. Global etiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. NatRev Endocrinol. [Internet]. 2018 [acceso 9 noviembre 2020]; 14 (1): 88-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.151

  3. World Health Organization. Diabetes [Internet] 2021 [acceso 21 noviembre 2020]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3ExJznE

  4. Federación Internacional de Diabetes. Atlas de la Diabetes de la FID [Internet]. 9a ed. Bélgica: FID; 2019. p. 1-45[acceso 25 noviembre 2020]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3uXSBan

  5. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición [Internet]. [acceso 23 noviembre 2020].Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3xIZXjB

  6. Salinas MA. Cost of diabetes treatment in Mexico. Mex J Med Res [Internet]. 2021 [acceso 27 noviembre 2020]; 9 (17):16–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29057/mjmr.v9i17.5593

  7. American Diabetes Association. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2021.Diabetes Care [Internet] 2021 [acceso 28 noviembre 2020]; 44 (Supplement 1): S15–S33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S002

  8. Dendup T, Feng X, Clingan S, Astell-Burt T. Environmental Risk Factors for Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: ASystematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2018 [acceso 9 noviembre 2020]; 15 (1): 78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010078

  9. Hill-Briggs F, Adler NE, Berkowitz SA, Chin MH, Gary-Webb TL, Navas-Acien A, et al. Social Determinants of Healthand Diabetes: A Scientific Review. Diabetes Care. [Internet] 2020 [acceso 25 noviembre 2020]; 44(1); 258–79. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2337/dci20-0053

  10. Braver D, Lakerveld NR, Rutters J. Built environmental characteristics and diabetes: a systematic review and metaanalysis.BMC Med [Internet]. 2018 [acceso 25 noviembre 2020]; 16 (12): 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0997-z

  11. Gebreab SY, Hickson DA, Sims M, Wyatt SB, Davis SK, Correa A, Diez-Roux AV. Neighborhood social and physicalenvironments and type 2 diabetes mellitus in African Americans: The Jackson Heart Study. Health & Place [Internet].2017 [acceso 26 noviembre 2020]; 43:128-137. Disponible en: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.12.001

  12. Ramírez-Girón N, Gallegos-Cabriales E, Ortiz-Rodríguez J. Community size, perception of health, depression anddiabetes mellitus in Mexican adults. Nova Scientia [Internet]. 2019 [acceso 28 noviembre 2020]; 11(23), 408-22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v11i23.2115

  13. Ramírez-Girón N, Gallegos-Cabriales E, Salazar-Gonzalez BC. Riesgo ecológico para desarrollar Diabetes Mellitustipo 2: derivación de una teoría de rango medio. Index de Enfermería [Internet] 2019 [acceso 28 noviembre 2020]; 28(4): 199-203. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3JUOEY3

  14. Polit D, Hungler B. Investigación científica en Ciencias de la Salud. 6ª ed. Ciudad de México: México; 2006. p. 497-499.

  15. Sousa VD, Ryan-Wenger NA, Driessnack M, Jaber AF. Factorial structure of the perception of risk factors for type 2diabetes scale: exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. J Eval Clin Pract [Internet]. 2010 [acceso 29 noviembre2020];16 (6):1096–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01276.x

  16. Ramírez-Girón N, Gallegos-Cabriales E. Caracterización de adultos sin riesgo, con riesgo y con diabetes en elnoreste de México. SANUS [Internet]. 2019 [acceso 19 abril 2022]; (10): 33-51. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3jTBhgo

  17. Cámara de Diputados del Honorable Congreso de la Unión [Internet]. Reglamento de la Ley General de Salud enMateria de Investigación para la salud. México: DOF, 2014. [acceso 29 noviembre 2020]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3MfQKDp




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com