medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatología

ISSN 1561-3100 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatología 2021; 35 (2)

Most used prosthetic components in total hip arthroplasty in central provinces

Urbay CF, Alfonso SR, Hondal ÁA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 1-14
PDF size: 381.88 Kb.


Key words:

total hip arthroplasty, prosthetic components, incidence.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The arthroplasty surgery and the replacement of a hip replacement is a complex and expensive surgery. The surgical strategy and prosthetic components are completely different depending on the existing bone deformities and personal anatomical characteristics of each patient, therefore, the planning of supplies of the different components is essential to meet the demands of the needy population and adequate economic efficiency to avoid unnecessary expenses due to overestimation or underestimation of claims.
Objective: To determine the needs by measurements of the different types of prosthetic components used in total hip arthroplasty in the central provinces and thus optimize investments, with the economic advantages that it entails.
Methods: A retrospective descriptive longitudinal study was carried out of the total hip arthroplasty operated cases at Arnaldo Milián Castro Hospital in Villa Clara, from December 1998 to date. Age, sex, origin and prosthetic components are the variables examined. The information is collected in the database created in SPSS, statistical analyzes was performed.
Results: The mean age was 62.36 years. The group of 61-80 years was the one with the highest incidence (215 patients). Male sex predominated (51.8%). The highest incidence corresponded to Villa Clara (692 patients). The cemented components 46-50 were the most used and in the uncemented components the most used were 48-56. Müller Stems 7.5 - 12.5. RALCA Cemented T0-T4, uncemented T1-T3. In the SLA the most used were 11.5 and 13 respectively. Standard necks were those with the highest incidence (390 patients).
Conclusions: The demand for each measure can be determined quite accurately for every 100 cases pending operation with the incidents of the different measures used by each of the components expressed, allowing to meet the demands of the most used measures and appropriate distribution at supplying, which would result in vital economic benefit in the current conditions of the country.


REFERENCES

  1. Charnley J, Feagin J. A Low-friction arthroplasty in congenital subluxation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973 Mar-Apr [acceso 01/02/2021];(91):98-113. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4574070/

  2. Deveza LA, Nelson AE, Loeser RF. Phenotypes of osteoarthritis: current state and future implications. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Sep-Oct [acceso 01/02/2021];37 Suppl 120(5):64-72. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6936212/

  3. Banaszkiewicz PA. Total Hip Replacement in Congenital Dislocation and Dysplasia of the Hip. In: Banaszkiewicz PA, Kader D. (eds) Classic Papers in Orthopaedics. London: Springer; 2014. p.125-8.

  4. Abrahams JM, Callary SA, Munn Z, Jang SW, Huang Q, Howie DW, et al. Acetabular Component Migration Measured Using Radiostereometric Analysis Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review. JBJS Rev. 2020 Apr [acceso 06/02/2021];8(4):e0170. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32304493/

  5. Jin SY, Jin JY, Cheon JH, Yoon TR, Park KS. Survival Analysis of Total Hip Arthroplasty for High Hip Dislocation Secondary to Developmental Dysplasia or Septic Arthritis of the Hip. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov [acceso 06/02/2021];20:1-7. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33248922/

  6. Manson T, Schmidt AH. Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev. 2016 Oct [acceso 06/02/2021];4(10):1-14. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27792674/

  7. Berliner JL, Brodke DJ, Chan V, et al. John Charnley Award: Preoperative Patient reported Outcome Measures Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Function After THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:321-7.

  8. Zujur D, Álvarez-Barreto JF. ATC y Recubrimientos de Quitosano. Rev Ingeniería Biomédica. 2016 Ene-Jun [acceso 12/02/2021];10(19):33-43. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rinbi/v10n19/v10n19a04.pdf

  9. Barúa CN. Panorama en cuanto al uso de prótesis total de cadera en los hospitales del IPS y clínicas: Elaboración de directrices. [Tesis de Maestría]. San Lorenzo-Paraguay: Universidad Nacional de Asunción; 2011. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283302607

  10. Fernández MB. Prótesis de Cadera: Indicaciones de Uso Apropiado. Vitoria-Gasteiz. España: Departamento de Sanidad, Gobierno Vasco; 1999. Informe nº: Osteba E-99-08.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatología. 2021;35