medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica

Órgano oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Dermatológica y Oncológica, AC
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica 2022; 20 (3)

Postoperative pressure ulcers in postoperative patients with lumbar spine arthrodesis

Fernández CR, Ramírez CI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 280-284
PDF size: 297.05 Kb.


Key words:

postoperative pressure ulcers, arthrodesis, lumbar spine, facial region.

ABSTRACT

Background: postoperative pressure ulcers (PPU) are an indicator of the quality of care during spinal surgery, so since the facial region is a site of greater susceptibility to edema due to its anatomical characteristics, measures should be taken to prevent PPU in this topography.
Objective: to describe a series of cases of facial pressure ulcers in postoperative patients with lumbar spine arthrodesis.
Material and method: descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study. A retrospective search was performed in the database of dermatology consultations in a tertiary hospital (Hospital Central Militar, Sedena) from January 2016 to June 2018 of patients diagnosed with facial pressure ulcers by decubitus prolonged prone.
Results: 11 postoperative patients with lumbar spine arthrodesis were obtained, with an average surgery time of six hours, with a predominance of males (54.5%), with a median age of 58 years, the stage of the PPU classification that most predominated it was II (72.8%).
Conclusions: the main factor that determines the appearance of postoperative pressure ulcers is the prolonged time of surgery that implies greater pressure on facial bone protrusions.


REFERENCES

  1. Hai-Yan H, Hong-Lin Ch, Xu-Juan X, Pressure-redistribution surfacesfor prevention of surgery-related pressure ulcers: a meta-analysis, OstomyWound Management 2013; 59 (4):36-48.

  2. Kim JM, Lee H, Ha T y Na S, Perioperative factors associated with pressureulcer development after major surgery, Korean J Anesthesiol 2018;71(1):48-56. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.48. Epub, 4 de julio de 2017.

  3. Goodwin CR, Recinos PF, Omeis I, Momin EN, Witham TF, Bydon A,Gokaslan ZL y Wolinsky JP, Prevention of facial pressure ulcers usingthe Mayfield clamp for sacral tumor resection, J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14(1):85-7.

  4. DePasse JM, Palumbo MA, Haque M, Eberson CP y Daniels AH, Complicationsassociated with prone positioning in elective spinal surgery,World J Orthop 2015; 6(3):351-9.

  5. Shafipour V, Ramezanpour E, Gorji MA y Moosazadeh M, Prevalenceof postoperative pressure ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis,Electron Physician 2016; 8(11):3170-6.

  6. Weng-Yi L, Pao-Chen L, Chia-Hsing W, Yi-Lin L y Wen-Lin T, A projectto reduce the incidence of facial pressure ulcers caused by prolongedsurgery with prone positioning, Journal of Nuirsing 2012; 59(3): 70-8.

  7. Shoemake S, The clinical issue pressure ulcers in the surgical patient,Kimberly-Clark Trusted clinical solutions. Disponible en: www.kavandishsystem.ir/files/.../Pressure_Ulcer_Study_Guide.pd.

  8. Scott SM, Progress and challenges in perioperative pressure ulcer prevention,J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2015; 42(5):480-5.

  9. Díaz-Martínez J, López-Donaire P, Molina-Mercado P, Peláez-PanaderoM, Torres-Aguilar JC y Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL, Úlceras por presiónen el postoperatorio de intervenciones quirúrgicas de cadera o derodilla, Gerokomos 2009; 20(2):84-91.

  10. Gómez Ginés D, Rodríguez Palma M, García Pavón F, Almozara MRy Torra i Bou JE, Úlceras por presión en quirófano. Incidencia intraoperatoriaen pacientes sometidos a cirugía cardiaca, Gerokomos 2009;20(4):176-80.

  11. Sáenz Jalón M, Sarabia Cobo CM, Santiago Fernández M, Briz CasaresS, Roscales Bartolomé E y García Cobo A, Prevalencia de úlceras porpresión en pacientes sometidos a artrodesis de columna, Gerokomos2016; 27(3):123-6.

  12. Torra i Bou JE, Segovia Gómez T, Verdú Soriano J, Nolasco BonmatíA, Rueda López J y Arboix i Perejamo M, The effectiveness of a hyperoxygenatedfatty acid compounding preventing pressure ulcers, JWound Care, 2005; 14(3):117-21.

  13. Grisell M y Place HM, Face tissue pressure in prone positioning: acomparison of three face pillows while in the prone position for spinalsurgery, Spine (Filadelfia) 2008; 33(26):2938-41.

  14. De Oliveira KF, Nascimento KG, Nicolussi AC, Chavaglia SRR, De AraújoCA y Barbosa MH, Support surfaces in the prevention of pressureulcers in surgical patients: an integrative review, Int J Nurs Pract 2017;23(4).

  15. Hatef DA, Ellsworth WA, Allen JN, Bullocks JM, Hollier Jr LH, StalS, Perioperative steroids for minimizing edema and ecchymosis afterrhinoplasty: a meta-analysis, Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31(6):648-57. doi:10.1177/1090820X11416110.

  16. Fleischli JW et al., Use of postoperative steroids to reduce pain andinflammation, J Foot Ankle Surg 1999.

  17. Uchiyama A, Yamada K, Perera B, Ogino S, Yokoyama Y, Takeuchi Y,Ishikawa O y Motegi S, Topical betamethasone butyrate propionateexacerbates pressure ulcers after cutaneous ischemia-reperfusion injury,Experimental Dermatology 2016.

  18. Thomas DR, Clinical management of pressure ulcers, Clin Geriatr Med2013; 29(2):397-413.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica. 2022;20