2022, Number 2
Pre-hospital treatment of COVID-19 patients from a reference hospital in Mexico City
Full text
10.35366/108493
Language: English/Spanish [Versi?n en espa?ol]
References: 19
Page: 80-85
PDF size: 282.03 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective: more than a year after the emergence of COVID-19, many drug therapies have been considered, all based on a critical evaluation of the emerging literature. The main objective of our study was to know the pre-hospitalary treatment of patients with COVID-19. Material and methods: we reviewed 101 clinical records of hospitalized patients at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas National (INER) diagnosed with COVID-19 during the second wave of the pandemic. A database was created, and descriptive statistics were performed using the software GraphPad Prism version 8. Results: the mean age of the patients was 52.3 (± 11.9) years. Patients received 4-5 medications as pre-hospital treatment; the most commonly prescribed medications were corticosteroids and antibiotics. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients received a large number of unnecessary medications during pre-hospital medical care; several of them were prescribed despite the lack of scientific evidence on their use and the national and international recommendations for treating the disease.INTRODUCTION
SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) described in December 2019 resulted in a pandemic with a rapidly increasing incidence. More than two years after the emergence of COVID-19, many pharmacologic therapies have been considered for its treatment and it has been necessary to frequently update practices on their use based on a critical evaluation of the emerging literature. Practices related to the evaluation and treatment of COVID-19 during the first six months of the pandemic varied widely around the world. Depending on the severity of illness, supportive measures were adjusted: patients with mild disease usually recovered at home, with minimal care and isolation, while patients with moderate disease had to be monitored frequently, and sometimes hospitalized,1 because they could progress to critical illness with hypoxemic respiratory failure and require prolonged ventilatory support.2
Initially, there was interest in the repositioning of drugs such as chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, sometimes accompanied by azithromycin, based on reports of randomized clinical trials with a small sample size.3,4 Both drugs have been used in the treatment of autoimmune diseases due to their immunomodulatory effects and particularly for their action on proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-6.5 Their use in COVID-19 was justified by the antiviral effects that these drugs exert in vitro against SARS-CoV-2 and, in association with azithromycin, it was suggested that they could reduce viral load.3,4 In Mexico, on June 6, 2020, the "Recommendations for the treatment of infection by SARS-CoV-2, causative agent of COVID-19" were published, proposing the use of these drugs.6 With the passage of time and the publication of international studies, it was observed that there was no beneficial effect of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.7,8 The RECOVERY (Randomized Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy) clinical trial showed that hydroxychloroquine did not decrease mortality in hospitalized patients compared to standard treatment (supportive care).9 On December 23, 2020, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) amended its guidelines to dismiss the use of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin as a strong recommendation, with evidence of moderate certainty.10
Glucocorticoids were also initially suggested due to concerns about the presence of a hyperinflammatory state that causes the severe manifestations of COVID-19, and other immunomodulatory therapies were also investigated. Several therapeutic interventions were proposed to mitigate the inflammatory organ injury in this viral pneumonia and the value of glucocorticoids was widely discussed.11 A trial involving the use of a short course of methylprednisolone showed beneficial effect only in patients over 60 years of age with severe COVID-19; however, uncertainty remained about the use of glucocorticoids.12 Later, the RECOVERY trial reported that dexamethasone reduced mortality among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, although the benefit was limited to patients receiving supplemental oxygen, being greatest among patients requiring mechanical ventilation.13 In its September 2020 update, the IDSA added dexamethasone as a recommendation with moderate certainty evidence;10 however, this drug did not improve the prognosis of patients who did not receive supplemental oxygen and could have undesirable effects; therefore, it is not recommended for the treatment of mild or moderate COVID-19.1
The use of ivermectin was evaluated empirically in uncontrolled studies for COVID-19,14 and subsequently its use was not recommended outside the context of a clinical trial.10 On March 31, 2021 the World Health Organization issued a warning on the inappropriate use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, considering the lack of scientific evidence about its efficacy and safety in the treatment of this disease.15
Antimicrobials have been overused during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some, such as doxycycline, because of the assumption that their intracellular effects could reduce viral replication, as well as prevent cell damage and expression of inflammatory molecules.16 Others, such as macrolides, because of their potential immunomodulatory effect17 that could counteract the exaggerated inflammatory process of COVID-19, have been used singly and in combination with other drugs.4 Currently, antibiotics are only recommended when there is clinical and/or microbiological evidence of bacterial infection associated with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia and short treatment regimens should be considered.1
Considering the clinical guidelines on the use of various drugs against COVID-19, the aim of this study was to describe the drugs that were indicated on an outpatient basis (prior to hospitalization) to patients seen at INER during the second upsurge of cases.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The clinical records of 101 patients hospitalized at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas (INER) with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were reviewed, during the period from April to September 2021, when there was a spike in cases, according to information from the General Directorate of Epidemiology of Mexico. All patients who were admitted to INER, who signed the informed consent (patients or their relatives) and who had the complete file for review were included. Convenience sampling was performed.
Patient demographic data, pathologic history, days of evolution and symptoms of the disease and the outcome at hospital discharge were collected; a database was formed and descriptive statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism, version 8. The treatments that patients received on an outpatient basis (before hospitalization) were analyzed to determine whether there was an association with death or discharge due to patient improvement. Medications were separated by drug group and subsequently the Mann-Whitney U test (nonparametric) was performed to determine if there were differences between groups; a p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. The frequency of indication was also described, which refers to the number of times a drug was indicated, as some patients were prescribed the same drug on several different occasions during their evolution.
This project followed the ethical considerations mentioned in the declaration of Helsinki,18 as last updated in Fortaleza, Brazil, and is part of protocol E08-20, approved by the INER Ethics and Research Committee. The confidentiality of the patients' personal data was maintained.
RESULTS
Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics of the study population. Of the 101 patients studied, the mean age was 52.3 years (± 11.9); 55% of the patients were discharged due to improvement, while 39% died. Most patients had a history of obesity (50.5%), followed by systemic arterial hypertension (36.6%) and diabetes mellitus (26.7%). The average number of days spent in hospital was 10.9 days. Among the symptoms mainly reported by the patients or their relatives were fever (60.4%), myalgia (45.5%) and headache (40.6%). The respiratory symptom most frequently reported by patients or their relatives was dyspnea (83.2%); gastrointestinal symptoms were the least frequently reported, including diarrhea (9.9%), abdominal pain (3.0%) and vomiting (2.0%). On admission, patients had a mean oxygen saturation of 63% (± 18.4).
Table 2 shows the different drugs used for outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection grouped according to the function of each type of drug, e.g., antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, etcetera. Some drugs were grouped under the name "airways", despite having different mechanisms of action, considering that their usefulness lies in improving the patient's ventilatory process. The table also shows the number of times each drug was prescribed and the number of patients in whom it was prescribed.
The patients received between four and five medications as prehospital treatment. The most frequently prescribed medications were corticosteroids and antibiotics. Dexamethasone was the most prescribed corticosteroid (47 patients); while, in the antibiotic group, azithromycin was found in first place (31 patients), followed by ceftriaxone (25 patients), levofloxacin (15 patients) and clarithromycin (11 patients).
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the third most frequently prescribed group of drugs on an outpatient basis for the treatment of COVID-19; a total of 41 persons were prescribed paracetamol, while 20 were given ibuprofen. Antihistamines and anticoagulants were prescribed in a smaller proportion; enoxaparin was the anticoagulant with the highest frequency of indication (nine patients). The patients or their relatives also reported the prescription of bronchodilators, and four patients were also prescribed immunomodulators.
DISCUSSION
The COVID-19 pandemic has generated difficulties in patient care, initially due to the lack of knowledge of the virus and the disease itself, as well as the sudden increase of cases in all countries, which sometimes exceeded the capacities of the different health systems in the world. Over time, treatment guidelines emerged based on recommendations from the countries that handled the first cases of this disease. Initially, these recommendations included drugs used in various viral infections and anti-inflammatory drugs in general, and later key points observed in severe patients, such as systemic inflammation and coagulation alterations, were considered.
By the beginning of the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, sufficient information was already available regarding the effectiveness of some of the repositioning drugs for emergency use in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Based on clinical studies, clinical practice guidelines were modified, ruling out the effectiveness of the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, the combination of hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin, and ivermectin.10 Although the use of dexamethasone was found to reduce mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, its usefulness was restricted only for patients requiring supplemental oxygen and/or mechanical ventilation.13
In this review, we evaluated the follow-up of recommendations in guidelines for the treatment of COVID-19, with a focus on prehospital primary care, and assessed whether there was a correlation with the outcome of patients seen at INER. It was observed that despite existing recommendations for the treatment of patients with COVID-19, dexamethasone and prednisone were prescribed in half of the patients during the primary care they received prior to admission to INER. Prescription of antibiotics without evidence of bacterial infection was also observed, with azithromycin being the most commonly used.
No differences in outcome were observed in patients who were prescribed steroids prior to hospitalization compared to those who were not. These results are consistent with Annane's review, where glucocorticoid use was not associated with an increased risk of bacterial infection or delayed viral clearance.19
An interesting fact we found in this study is that all types of medications were applied in patients who initially had a mild symptom picture and apparently did not prevent patients from developing a severe picture requiring hospitalization, considering that all of them were admitted to INER for medical care. However, one of the limitations of the study is the difficulty of analyzing the effect of prehospital treatment on hospital treatment and the outcome of the patients, considering that we found a large number of variables related to the amount and type of drugs used, as well as the variables of the individuals themselves, such as age, sex and presence of comorbidities, which together may contribute to the evolution of the disease.
CONCLUSIONS
Given the lack of a specific treatment against SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the variety of clinical manifestations, including the severity of the clinical picture, it is important to follow the recommendations of national and international health authorities, which are based on the most recently generated scientific evidence, and which consider different population groups for their development. The use of repositioning drugs has been a commonly used option in clinical practice. However, the lack of knowledge of the pathophysiology of the disease and the inability to predict the outcome of each patient should not be a reason to abuse unnecessary drugs, such as antibiotics, which involves other important problems in global public health, such as bacterial resistance. It is not advisable to exceed the use of other drugs that have proven useful in a specific group of patients, such as steroids, since their indiscriminate use could have unfavorable consequences on clinical outcome. Furthermore, the adverse effects of all drugs should be considered, especially when they are used in combination; their use should be prudent in patients with a disease that is still being studied worldwide.
REFERENCES
AFFILIATIONS
1Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosío Villegas. Mexico City, Mexico.
Conflict of interests: the authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
CORRESPONDENCE
Laura Elena Carreto-Binaghi, MD. E-mail: lecarreto@iner.gob.mxReceived: XII-12-2021; accepted: VII-27-2022.