medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3186 (Electronic)

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Acta Médica 2021; 22 (3)

Introducing of the high resolution esophageal Manometry technique

Labrada SM, Hernández MH, García AM, Páez SD, Cardín HA, Virulich MJ

Language: Spanish
References: 33
Page:
PDF size: 122.29 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: High resolution esophageal manometry is the optimal method for the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders, with high sensitivity and specificity. An investigation was carried out with the objective of describing the results of the introduction of the technique at “Hermanos Ameijeiras” Hospital.
Methods: descriptive study of case series, in 182 patients who underwent MAR in the Digestive Motility Laboratory of the Gastroenterology service of the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital, in the period from January 2018 to January 2019.
Results: Nine three percent (93 %) were useful studies and gastroesophageal reflux disease (40,1%) and functional dysphagia (32,3 %) the most frequent indications. 77,3 % had a previous study of esophagus-stomach-duodenum and 80,9% had an upper digestive endoscopy. Minor esophageal motility disorders were the most common (101 patients) and ineffective motility predominated in them (84 patients, 45,9 %). Type II gastroesophageal junction was the most frequent (43, 7 %).
Conclusions: The introduction of high resolution esophageal manometry allows accurate and early diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders with specific therapeutic intervention.


REFERENCES

  1. Roman S, Huot L, Zerbib F, des Varannes SB, Gourcerol G, Coffin B, et al.High-resolution manometry improves the diagnosis of esophageal motilitydisorders in patients with dysphagia: a randomized multicenter study. Am JGastroenterol. 2016 [acceso: 12/03/2021];111:372-80. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26832656/

  2. Arndorfer RC, Stef JJ, Dodds WJ, Linehan JH, Hogan WJ. Improved infusionsystem for intraluminal esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 1977[acceso: 11/02/2021]; 73:23-7. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/324861/

  3. Soudagar AS, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP. Learners favour high resolutionoesophageal manometry with better diagnostic accuracy over conventionalline tracings. Gut. 2012 [acceso: 15/03/2021];61:798-803. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21997554/

  4. Carlson DA, Ravi K, Kahrilas PJ, Gyawali CP, Bredenoord AJ, Castell DO, etal. Diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders: Esophageal pressure topographyvs. conventional line tracing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 [acceso:15/03/2021];110:967-77. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26032151/

  5. Kumar D, Zifan A, Ghahremani G, Kunkel DC, Horgan S, Mitta RK.Morphology of the Esophageal Hiatus: Is It Different in 3 Types of HiatusHernias? J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 [acceso: 15/03/2021];26:51-60.Disponible en:https://www.jnmjournal.org/journal/view.html?uid=1556&vmd=Full&

  6. Weitzendorfer M, Köhler G, Antoniou SA, Pallwein-Prettner L, ManzenreiterL, Schredl P, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of hiatal hernia: barium swallow Xray,high-resolution manometry or endoscopy? Eur Surg. 2017 [acceso:03/03/2021];49:210-17. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29104588/

  7. Roman S, Holloway R, Keller J, Herbella F, Zerbib F, Xiao Y, et al.Validation of criteria for the definition of transient lower esophagealsphincter relaxations using high- resolution manometry. NeurogastroenterolMotil. 2017 [acceso: 15/03/2021];29:e12920. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27477826/

  8. Huang L, Hom C, Chen T, Pimentel M, Rezaie A. Safety and tolerability ofhigh-resolution esophageal manometry: a large database analysis [Abstract].Gastroenterology. 2017 [acceso: 03/03/2021];152Suppl1:S325. Disponible en:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316371744_Safety_and_Tolerability_of_High-Resolution_Esophageal_Manometry_A_Large_Database_Analysis

  9. Carlson DA, Omari T, Lin Z, Rommel N, Starkey K, Kharilas PJ, et al. Highresolutionimpedance manometry parameters enhance the esophageal motilityevaluation in non- obstructive dysphagia patients without a major ChicagoClassification motility disorder. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 [acceso:03/03/2021];29:e12941. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27647522/

  10. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, Clarke JO, Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas PJ.Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a studyof 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 [acceso:03/03/2021];103:27-37. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17900331/

  11. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJ,et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders definedin high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil.2012 [acceso: 03/03/2021];24Suppl1:57-65. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22248109/

  12. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, et al.The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders v3.0.Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 [acceso: 15/03/2021];27:160-74. Disponibleen: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25469569/

  13. Crespin OM, Tatum RP, Xiao K, Martin AV, Khandelwal S, Pellegrini CA, etal. The relationship between manometric subtype and outcomes of surgicaltreatment for patients with achalasia: achalasia: manometric subtypes. SurgEndosc. 2017 [acceso: 03/03/2021];31:5066–75. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28451814/

  14. Perez-Fernandez MT, Santander C, Marinero A, Burgos-Santamaria D,Chavarria-Herbozo C. Characterization and follow-up of esophagogastricjunction outflow obstruction detected by high resolution manometry.Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 [acceso: 15/03/2021];28:116-26. Disponibleen: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26517978/

  15. Clément M, Zhu WJ, Neshkova E, Bouin M. Jackhammer esophagus: Frommanometric diagnosis to clinical presentation. Can J GastroenterologyHepatol. 2019. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5036160

  16. Crowell MD, Umar SB, Griffing WL, Di Baise JK, Lacy BE, Vela MF.Esophageal motor abnormalities in patients with scleroderma: heterogeneity,risk factors, and effects on quality of life. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017[acceso: 15/03/2021];15:207–13. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27613260/

  17. Roman S, Kahrilas PJ. Distal esophageal spasm. Curr Opin Gastroenterol.2015[acceso:12/02/2021];31:328-33. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26039725/

  18. Abdel Jalil AA, Castell DO. Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM): the old–new frontier in esophagology. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 [acceso:12/02/2021];18:1. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26685862/

  19. Yadlapati R, Keswani RN, Dunbar KB, Gawron AJ, Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ,et al. Benchmarks for the interpretation of esophageal high-resolutionmanometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 [acceso: 12/02/2021];29:1-7.Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27739183/

  20. Gyawali CP, Roman S, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Keller J, Pandolfino JE, etal. Classification of esophageal motor findings in gastro-esophageal refluxdisease: conclusions from an international consensus group.Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 [acceso: 12/02/2021];29:e13104. Disponibleen: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28544357/

  21. Naik P, Jia Y, McCallum RW. Gastroesophageal reflux can be anexplanation for dysphagia of Otherwise Unknown Etiology. PracticalGastroenterology. 2017 [acceso: 12/02/2021];23:50-6. Disponible en:https://practicalgastro.com/2017/12/02/gastroesophageal-reflux-can-be-anexplanation-for-dysphagia-of-otherwise-unknown-etiology/

  22. Anido VM, Martínez R, Brizuela R, García J, García E, Díaz Z. Estudio pormanometría esofágica de pacientes con enfermedad por reflujogastroesofágico en Cuba. Revista Gen. 2011 [acceso: 12/02/2021];65:177-82.Disponible en: http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?pid=S0016-35032011000300004&script=sci_abstract

  23. Ríos CM, Calahorrano J, Sánchez P. Trastornos motores esofágicos y surelación con el reflujo gastro-esofágico a través de la manometría de altaresolución. Rev Fac Cien Med Quito. 2017 [acceso: 12/02/2021];42:98-102.Disponible en:https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CIENCIAS_MEDICAS/article/view/1524

  24. Triggs J, Pandolfino J. Recent advances in dysphagia management. F 1000Research 2019. DOI: http://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.18900.1

  25. Pose AC, Reyes L, Saona G, Umpierre V. Manometría esofágica enpacientes con disfagia, reflujo gastroesofágico y dolor torácico no cardíaco.Utilidad diagnóstica. Rev Med Urug 2009 [acceso: 12/02/2021];25:34-44.Disponible en:http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-03902009000100005

  26. Dekel R, Pearson T, Wendel C, De Garmo P, Fennerty B, Fass R.Assessment of oesophageal motor function in patients with dysphagia or chestpain – the clinical outcomes research initiative experience. Aliment PharmacolTher 2003 [acceso: 12/02/2021];18:1083-9. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14653827/

  27. Tutuian R, Castell DO. Clarification of the esophageal function defect inpatients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies usingcombined impedance-manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004 [acceso:12/02/2021];2:230-6. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15017607/

  28. Ho SC, Chang CS, Wu CY, Chen GH. Ineffective esophageal motility is aprimary motility disorder in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2002[acceso: 12/02/2021];47:652-6. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11911355/

  29. Blonski W, Vela M, Safder A, Hila A, Castell DO. Revised criterion fordiagnosis of ineffective esophageal motility is associated with more frequentdysphagia and greater bolus transit abnormalities. Am J Gastroenterol 2008 [acceso: 12/02/2021];103:699-704. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18341490/

  30. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Carlson DA, Pandolfino JE. Advances inmanagement of esophageal motility disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.2018 [acceso: 12/02/2021];16:1692-700. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29702296/

  31. Vaezi MF, Felix VN, Penagini R, Mauro A, de Moura EG, Pu LZ, et al.Achalasia: from diagnosis to management. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 [acceso:12/02/2021];1381:34-44. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27571581/

  32. Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, Bruley des Varannes S, Chaussade S,Costantini M, et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend onmanometric subtype. Gastroenterology. 2013 [acceso: 12/02/2021];144:718-25. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23277105/

  33. Ciriza C, Canga F, Castel I, Lora D, de la Cruz J, Castellano G. Utilidad dela manometría de alta resolución en el diagnóstico de la disrupción de launión gastroesofágica: causas que influye en su disrupción y asociación conreflujo gastroesofágico y alteraciones manométricas. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2014[acceso: 12/02/2021];106:22-9. Disponible en:https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?pid=S113001082014000100004&script=sci_arttext&tlng=es




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com